Back to @Ravious101's profile

Ravious101 🦅🇺🇸 engagement report

@Ravious101 - 252K followers on X

Measured over 79 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.282%
of 252K followers
Per impression
10.4%
6.8K views on a typical post
Reach
2.70%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
713
interactions (median)
Saved
0.117%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.9/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 713 interactions against 252K followers, an engagement rate of 0.282%. Measured over 79 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 6.8K times each, and 10.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.71% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 79 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 20% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.2K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 79 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ravious101 🦅🇺🇸's engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.282%, Ravious101 🦅🇺🇸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video84% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 84% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 666 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 202612x their median

    For anyone who is all for socialized healthcare, like Canada. Let me make you aware of how horrible that is. This is Niagara Falls, Ontario. This week. An American nurse went to that ER. She says about 40 people were lined on gurneys in the hallways all the way toward the foyer. Overflow bay. Dried fluids under the bed. Floors filthy. Urine and feces in the air. Hours for sutures on her face. No ice for about three hours. She says the doctor came in with dirty gloves, didn’t wash, touched the wound with bare hands, and didn’t clean it before stitching. A nurse set down ointment and told her to do it. Her sister cleaned the blood off. No privacy. She heard full conversations between staff and the patients right outside her door. She thinks the only reason she got a room at all is that she’s American and paying cash. Staff told her she was lucky. Some people wait 8 to 12 hours.

    5.4K2.3K408123176K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20266.4x their median

    Why isn't this blowing up the news on every channel? Federal investigators say they dismantled a nationwide scheme that sold $250 million in fake nursing diplomas to 15,000 people, many of whom have since disappeared into the health care system, per Special Agent in Charge Isaac Bledsoe. An undercover agent bought a fraudulent diploma for $16,000 without nursing classes or training. Prosecutors said 43 defendants were convicted, with sentences of four to six years, and that proceeds funded luxury homes, cars and travel.

    2.9K1.5K1173229K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20266.4x their median

    Let’s talk about the massive clash between protecting America and upholding the Constitution. The Trump administration recently attempted to deport international students supporting radical campus activism. The administration argued the policy is 100% necessary for national security, border control, and public safety to remove individuals who oppose American values. However, a federal judge just completely blocked it. U.S. District Judge Noël Wise, a Biden appointee from the Northern District of California who previously served as a California state judge appointed by Jerry Brown, ruled against the policy on Friday. In her 90-page decision ruling in favor of The Stanford Daily student newspaper, she declared that the First Amendment protects everyone legally present in the country, including non-citizens. Did you see that she says the first amendment protects non-citizens. Even though everyday these non-citizens are doing violent crimes and death to us. Biden let in what is the total over 40 million illegals into America no background checks no care in the word if they are murderers or not. This brings us to the ultimate question on my feed today. Take a look at this graphic. Which of these would you actually support banning to keep the homeland safe? 1. The Quran 2. Mosques 3. Hijabs 4. Sharia Law 5. Public Calls to Prayer We are walking a fine line between national survival and constitutional rights.

    1.8K7571.8K17423K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20266.3x their median

    Let nature take its course. You can’t help some people. Hope the lobster tails were worth it. 🤦‍♀️ https://t.co/pngmmKyYaB

    3.0K4201.0K6753K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20265.8x their median

    Joe Arminio got KICKED OUT of a forum debate in Delaware because he "misgendered" transgender Rep. Tim "Sarah" McBride (D) Arminio used "his" and "gentleman" to reference McBride HE'S RIGHT! Tim McBride IS A DUDE. This is a man. An adult human male who can't get pregnant because Transgenders are Men

    2.5K1.2K3326718K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20265.7x their median

    Have you tasted this crap? Who is buying this? I didn’t stop buying Campbell’s soup because of the price. I stopped because it doesn’t taste like food anymore. 🥣🔬 I grew up on this stuff. It was what my mom would give me and I loved it But lately, walking down the grocery aisle feels different. I look at the cans and think: “Who is still paying for this?” Apparently, millions of other shoppers are asking the exact same thing. The Campbell's Company just reported a massive financial breakdown: a 12% drop in their snack empire (Goldfish, Snyder’s, Pepperidge Farm), a brutal 36% dividend cut, and an aggressive $500 million cost-cutting plan. For years, big food brands thought they had unlimited "pricing power." They assumed we’d just keep absorbing higher prices forever. But they forgot a critical rule: If you’re going to charge premium prices, you can’t deliver a downgraded product. 📉 We aren't just paying more; we're paying more for recipes that have been systematically hollowed out by corporate accountants. Over the years, the classic comfort food we loved has been swapped for: Cheap Industrial Fillers: Heavy reliance on maltodextrin, cornstarch, and bioengineered stabilizers to artificially mimic thickness. Flavor Crutches: Doses of sodium and MSG pumped in to mask the fact that they cut down on real meat and vegetables. A "Commodity" Quality: A final product that looks less like a kitchen recipe and more like a chemistry lab experiment. When a can of condensed soup crosses $2.50 to $3.00, the nostalgia completely wears off. The math stops making sense. Consumers didn't just reach a price limit; they reached a quality limit. Have you noticed your favorite childhood brands changing their ingredients or skimping on quality lately? Seems like all the foods we grew up on are now full of chemicals and stuff you wouldn't feed your own dog.

    2.7K7396036752K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20265.2x their median

    THIS IS HEARTBREAKING and it should make every single patriotic American absolutely PISSED OFF. Look at this face. This is Tristan Swartz from Doing It Wrong Dairy out in Gilman, Wisconsin. He’s a multi-generational independent American farmer milking 50 cows the old-school way. He’s out there working his hands to the bone, 80+ hours a week, trying to keep a traditional way of life alive. And what does he get for it? Squeezed out by a corrupt, broken system. He completely exposes the absolute disaster facing our food supply. Small family farms aren't failing because our farmers got lazy. They are being intentionally suffocated by a government-backed "cheap food policy," insane regulatory overreach, and corporate Big Ag monopolies that fix the prices to line their own pockets while driving real Americans into bankruptcy. We are losing roughly 50 farms a DAY in this country. Think about that! The literal backbone of America—the people who feed us—are being driven into the dirt by corporate globalists and corrupt politicians from both sides of the aisle who don't give a damn about rural communities. The system wants everything corporate, automated, and hyper-regulated so they can control the entire supply chain. Tristan’s caption about a neighbor's animal finding its way to his place shows what's left: small, hardworking communities being forced to band together just to survive the collapse. Wake up, America! If you eat food, you need to be furious about this. When the family farm dies, American self-reliance dies with it. We need to stop relying on big-box corporate grocery cartels, fight back against tyrannical agricultural regulations, and start buying directly from the men and women who sweat over this land. Enough is enough. Stand up for our farmers.

    2.1K1.4K12511035K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20265.1x their median

    I keep reading that Texas is letting Muslims take over. Then this happened in a Texas school. They let a Muslim group in during school hours to hand out Qurans, Sharia pamphlets, and hijabs to teenagers. A 12-year-old stood up and asked what every parent was thinking: why does one religion get special access and the rest of us don’t? Public school is not a recruitment booth. Same rules for every faith. No special treatment. Not with our kids.

    2.1K1.3K1485714K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20264.6x their median

    🚨 UPDATE: Indiana Teen Sentenced to 54 Years for Horrific Abuse of Non-Verbal 7-Year-Old on School Bus Landon Doty, 16, was tried as an adult and received a 54-year prison sentence following a jury trial where he was convicted on 12 felony counts. The court ordered Doty to serve 50.5 years in the Indiana Department of Corrections, with the remaining time suspended to probation. A judge explicitly bypassed the juvenile justice system after ruling that Doty was "beyond rehabilitation" within the juvenile framework. The underlying incidents took place on a school bus designated for special needs students, where Doty had been placed as a disciplinary punishment. The evidence used during the trial included an extensive, 300-hour review of school bus surveillance footage. Following the criminal sentencing, the victim's family initiated a $10.5 million federal civil lawsuit against the Jennings County School Corporation and the bus staff. The civil action alleges extreme administrative negligence for placing an undisciplined student into a highly specialized environment for vulnerable children. Doty is currently being processed by the Indiana Department of Corrections to determine his placement in an adult state facility. He will be 66-years-old upon his scheduled release from prison.

    2.2K6264015341K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.5x their median

    A radical Islamic group just turned a a historic Baptist church in Richardson in Dallas Texas into a fortress, and it is 100% legal. 😡 The $3.8M buyout of a historic Baptist church in Richardson is finalized. They are moving in for the 2026–2027 school year right now. Can the city block it? No. Can the community vote on it? No. Because of federal zoning laws, switching from a Christian church to an Islamic seminary requires zero public approval. The system has completely tied our hands. The guy behind this? Shaykh Uthman ibn Farooq. He is literally BANNED from the UK, Canada, and Trinidad for his extreme rhetoric. Yet he is legally allowed to set up his U.S. headquarters right in the heart of Texas. While our borders are wide open, our culture is being bought out right under our noses. Wake up, America. 🇵🇹🇺🇸

    1.4K1.3K30716222K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 713 interactions against 252K followers, an engagement rate of 0.282%. Measured over 79 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 6.8K times each, and 10.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.71% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 79 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 20% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.2K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is Ravious101 🦅🇺🇸's engagement rate on X?
Ravious101 🦅🇺🇸 (@Ravious101) has an engagement rate of 0.282%, based on the median interactions across 79 original posts from the last 30 days against 252,307 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.282%, Ravious101 🦅🇺🇸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Ravious101 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Ravious101 post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going