Rasmus Jarlov engagement report
@RasmusJarlov - 85K followers on X
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 574 interactions against 85K followers, an engagement rate of 0.674%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 1.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Rasmus Jarlov's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.674%, Rasmus Jarlov sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 67% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 7% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 466 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 10, 202620x their median
As a Danish taxpayer, I think this is the best spent money ever. We will happily continue to pay to help a European country survive and to stop an existential threat against Europe. We are just wondering why so many other countries are free-riding and barely contributing? https://t.co/1GO44BPJBH
- Jul 31, 202610x their median
Show this to your MAGA friends who try to paint a picture of a collapsing Europe. https://t.co/1JE42Zq9vt
- Sep 22, 20269.0x their median
Americans will quickly move on. They will think that it is unfair that people in the rest of the world do not like them. But in Denmark and the rest of Europe, these insane statements will never be forgotten. https://t.co/vLKAZHBUYO
- Sep 19, 20266.4x their median
As a Dane, I dont like that the USA have gotten anything in Greenland at all because I do not like to reward threats. But it does seem that the USA have mostly gotten things that they already had and can now rule out scenarios that were never going to happen anyway. China and Russia will still never be allowed to have military bases in Greenland and the USA continues to have the right to have military bases like they have had since 1951. It is very far from 'we are going to own Greenland' but it does matter and can not just be written off as nothing. Trump whisperers who will claim that this once again is a victory for Trump's negotiation style do, however, have to ask themselves the question. Was it worth it? Because the threats and blackmailing will never be forgotten. The Danish officials will smile and thank the USA for the agreement but once you have threatened someone with military invasion, they will never like or trust you again. So the USA does now have slightly stronger security rights in Greenland but as you are already seeing in Iran, the days where countries like Denmark followed the USA whenever they called us are gone and that was worth a lot more.
- Aug 1, 20266.2x their median
As a European, I am so grateful that MAGA is always educating us how unsafe and horrible things are in Europe. Just look at these horrific numbers! https://t.co/qfvQ7BL6ds
- Aug 9, 20266.0x their median
This is a disaster. Not a single European country reproduces its own population. We seem to have forgotten the value of family, and unless we start getting some kids, we Europeans will become irrelevant and taken over by immigration. https://t.co/O5AbzlYEBo
- Sep 14, 20265.3x their median
Now that the whole world is paying higher gas prices because of Trump's moronic and failed war in Iran, let's remember how the arrogant USA government blamed and threw shit at Europe for not supporting the war to being with. Well. We were right, and you were wrong. Again. https://t.co/qNBFBkr8ZA
- Sep 22, 20265.0x their median
Trump just confirmed that the USA will open two new bases in Greenland. Most likely their old bases in Narsarsuaq and Kangerlussuaq where the Americans have left runways and buildings that they can move right back into. It is important to understand that this has nothing to do with the new agreement between USA, Denmark and Greenland as the USA has had the right to have bases in Greenland since 1951 but has just decided to abandon most of its bases in recent decades.
- Aug 14, 20264.6x their median
šŖšŗ 100 KM/H FOR EUROPE! I call on the European Union to introduce a mandatory European maximum speed limit of 100 km/h on all motorways and major roads. One Europe should have one clear maximum speed. Why? ā Safer roads ā fewer fatal accidents and serious injuries ā Less energy waste ā lower fuel and electricity consumption ā Less oil dependency ā Europe must reduce its dependence on imported fossil fuels ā Lower emissions ā slower speeds mean lower consumption ā Less noise ā especially around densely populated areas ā Simple European rules ā one common maximum across our continent Cities, villages, construction zones and dangerous road sections must of course retain lower speed limits where necessary. But the European maximum should be clear: 100 KM/H. Europe must become safer, more energy-efficient and less dependent on hostile energy suppliers. šŖšŗ One Europe. One maximum speed. 100 km/h. Gunther Fehlinger-Jahn Chairman, Austrian Committee for NATO Enlargement for Ukraine, Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Austria and the European Union @GunterFehlinger https://t.co/4HINhwoD2M #Europe #EuropeanUnion #EU #SpeedLimit #100kmh #RoadSafety #EnergySecurity #EnergyIndependence #Transport #Mobility #Climate #PaxEuropeana
- Sep 30, 20264.4x their median
End of February right before the war started: Inflation 2.4% 10 year Treasury 3.9% Mortgage Rates 6% Oil $67 Gas $3.10 Now: Inflation 3.4% 10 year Treasury 5.2% Mortgage Rates 7.6% Oil $90 Gas $4.43
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 574 interactions against 85K followers, an engagement rate of 0.674%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 1.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.
- What is Rasmus Jarlov's engagement rate on X?
- Rasmus Jarlov (@RasmusJarlov) has an engagement rate of 0.674%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 85,486 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.674%, Rasmus Jarlov sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RasmusJarlov have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RasmusJarlov post?
- Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.