Back to @RandPaul's profile

Rand Paul engagement report

@RandPaul - 6.0M followers on X

Measured over 74 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.067%
of 6.0M followers
Per impression
2.93%
137K views on a typical post
Reach
2.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.035%
48 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.87/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 4.0K interactions against 6.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.067%. Measured over 74 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 137K times each, and 2.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 74 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video and 45% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 139K interactions, about 35x its own typical post.

Measured over 74 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #iowafirst.

Compared with accounts its own size

Rand Paul's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 78% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.067%, Rand Paul sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video28% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link45% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 28% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 45% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 267 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 202635x their median

    Flock CEO Garrett Langley thinks you don’t deserve the right to privacy. He also has opted to blur his house in Google Maps, because he thinks he deserves the right to privacy. Remember this double-standard. https://t.co/jsiDBhLCBl

    114K23K7804945.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202628x their median

    A million Americans died. Workers lost jobs to mandates. Kids lost years of school they'll never get back. Businesses closed for good. Today my committee voted to hold Fauci in contempt for refusing to answer for any of it. https://t.co/D48ucDZIVm

    84K17K9.8K9571.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202625x their median

    Bill Gates held a top secret Q Clearance for 7 years, through the entire pandemic. He’s not an elected official. He’s not a scientist at NIH. He’s just a very wealthy private citizen who helped shaped the government’s COVID response. https://t.co/EAAlYr9bEH

    70K21K6.2K1.5K1.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202619x their median

    Birthright citizenship belongs to the children of American citizens, not those who broke our immigration laws to come to the United States. I introduced a Constitutional Amendment to end birthright citizenship for the children of illegal aliens.

    65K7.3K1.9K278796K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202618x their median

    🚨 HOLY CRAP! Dr. Fauci was COVERING UP data showing a miscarriage rate of OVER 80% in pregnant women who received mRNA COVID vaccines in their first trimester It was effectively an ABORTION SHOT. This is MURDER. Per documents released today by @RandPaul and @SenRonJohnson, "the raw data revealed an 82% miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester. This is consistent with the 81% miscarriage rate noted in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market data" This study was released in April 2021. But even in DECEMBER 2021, Fauci was STILL telling pregnant women to get the vaccine. FAUCI LIED AND PEOPLE DlED.

    51K20K1.8K1.2K1.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202615x their median

    Fauci privately warned of miscarriage risk linked to COVID vaccine while publicly claiming no issues, newly released texts show https://t.co/AfpDs6lhZ9 https://t.co/WfRdNAK75j

    41K12K2.9K4.1K29M viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202613x their median

    New revelations from Anthony Fauci's own diary confirm his team discussed aerosolizing Ebola, one of the deadliest viruses in the world. Ebola normally spreads through bodily fluids, not the air. Making it airborne would be catastrophic. And it's why I've spent years demanding real oversight of dangerous research like this. @KatiePavlich @NewsNation

    35K14K1.4K591512K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202613x their median

    Today, I visited Fort Knox to see the gold. Since the Fed opened in 1913, the dollar has lost 97% of its purchasing power. $100 back then is worth $3,300 today. That's because Congress spends into oblivion, with no regard for our national debt. At the same time, the Fed prints the difference.

    41K3.4K4.8K6993.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 202611x their median

    “The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.” -Margaret Thatcher

    36K4.3K2.9K6211.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202611x their median

    Flock has 120,000 cameras tracking cars across America, no warrant required. Over 5,000 police agencies have signed on. This isn't crime fighting. This is mass surveillance of every American, and a violation of our 4th Amendment rights. https://t.co/LW67xSOAMN

    31K8.3K2.6K547410K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#iowafirst

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.0K interactions against 6.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.067%. Measured over 74 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 137K times each, and 2.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 74 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video and 45% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 139K interactions, about 35x its own typical post.

What is Rand Paul's engagement rate on X?
Rand Paul (@RandPaul) has an engagement rate of 0.067%, based on the median interactions across 74 original posts from the last 30 days against 5,954,851 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.067%, Rand Paul sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RandPaul have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RandPaul post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going