Raheem J. Kassam engagement report
@RaheemKassam - 542K followers on X
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 132 interactions against 542K followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.586% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Raheem J. Kassam's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 38% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.024%, Raheem J. Kassam sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 154.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 53K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 54K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 52K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 56K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 45K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 63K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 75K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 82K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 99K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 102K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 105K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 103K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 84K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 78K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 69K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 60K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 54K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 239K |
| Monday | 0% | 303K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 305K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 259K |
| Thursday | -2% | 251K |
| Friday | -3% | 260K |
| Saturday | +3% | 234K |
Best tweets
- Aug 24, 202615x their median
📊🗳️ Intentions de vote au second tour @harrisint_fr x @RTLFrance ✅ Le Pen : 55% +4 ▪️Philippe : 45% -4 ✅ Le Pen : 57% +2 ▪️Attal : 43% -2 ✅ Le Pen : 68% +1 ▪️Mélenchon : 32% -1 https://t.co/Z3f8rkGFhu
- Aug 24, 20266.1x their median
Time Radio's political editor Anna Mikhailova says Reform UK's new housing policy is a "slippery slope." "I was born in Ukraine and came over when I was six ... Have only ever felt and been British in my mind, but obviously would not qualify for these sorts of things." @AVMikhailova | @JPonpolitics
- Aug 26, 20263.0x their median
The Times of London has quietly removed the central allegation from a report on Conservative Party leader Olukemi Badenoch’s meeting with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni in Rome. The story, which led The Times website on Tuesday, and featured prominently in the physical newspaper, claimed the Italian PM urged the Badenoch not to make a deal with Nigel Farage and Reform UK. After an investigation by The National Pulse, however, The Times – owned by Rupert Murdoch – was forced to materially change its story, leaving only around 30 percent of the original content in tact. The paper included no correction, no editor’s note, and no further explanation to readers. The drastically altered article still bears a poll relevant to their original headline: “Meloni warns friend Badenoch against deal with Farage,” and most of the comments relate to that story, even though all reference to the “deal,” as well as Reform or Farage have now been removed from the story. The National Pulse spoke with sources close to Meloni on Tuesday morning, whoconfirmed that no such conversation had taken place. The sources explained that the lie had been exposed to the Italian press immediately, and then to The Times, whose Political Editor, Steve Swinford, appears to have filed verbatim from the Conservative Party leader’s press team, without fact-checking with Meloni’s office, or even double-sourcing the story. The report initially presented this as a significant intervention from one conservative leader to another. Badenoch, it said, was resisting pressure to cooperate with Farage’s Reform, with Meloni supposedly advising her to hold the line. It was precisely the sort of foreign endorsement the Tory leader’s camp needs: Meloni, Europe’s most electorally successful right-wing prime minister, apparently backing Badenoch against the insurgent party threatening to consume the Conservatives. But Meloni’s Brothers of Italy has now flatly denied the conversation took place. In a clarification now reported by both Italian and European outlets, sources close to Meloni said she had never advised Badenoch against an alliance with Farage or Reform UK. They stressed that Meloni had “no reason for hostility” towards Farage’s movement, and said she neither had entered nor wished to enter the domestic political dynamics between British parties. The original article, originally 756 words, became a 477-word piece with a new, innocuous headline: “I want to revive economy like Giorgia Meloni did, says Kemi Badenoch.” What remained was a substantially less dramatic account of two friendly politicians discussing the economy, wealthy people leaving their countries, Ukraine, and Meloni’s political path. The Times has erased the central claims of their own story without so much as a note at the top or bottom – a fundamentally dishonest response never seen before in UK media. The episode leaves serious questions for Steve Swinford, Badenoch, and Conservative Party headquarters. 1. Who briefed the purported conversation? 2. Did Badenoch’s team supply the anti-Reform framing? 3. Was the story double-sourced with anyone close to Meloni before publication? 4. Why did The Times apparently accept a claim so politically convenient to the Tory leader without obtaining meaningful confirmation from the Italian side? Until those questions are answered, the reasonable inference is that the Conservatives appear to have fabricated a private exchange with Meloni in order to weaponise her prestige against Reform, while The Times bought it hook, line, and sinker. The paper of record and the establishment party have once again demonstrated that they are two cheeks of the same arse: one supplying the spin, the other laundering it into fact, and nothing but excrement coming out.
- Aug 26, 20261.5x their median
Left, October 2014 Right August 2026 https://t.co/SVsYUY531A
- Aug 25, 2026
In the past hour, about 1,000 new people have followed me, browsing the names, they appear legit humans. I don’t have any posts going viral. I’m not trending. I don’t seem to have been mentioned in any news articles. For context, I’ve recently had posts with over a million views that brought me barely 100 new followers. So this is perplexing. Anyway, welcome, new X friends. Can any of you enlighten me as to what’s happening?
- Aug 25, 2026
Tories Retract Claim That Meloni Advised Badenoch Against Deal With Reform https://t.co/GnNV0kRYFo https://t.co/kquS5gE52D
- Aug 5, 2026
Today, my team and I are at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals for oral argument in the Plaquemines Parish coastal litigation case. I've consistently fought for Louisiana's oil and gas industry because it's critical to our State's economy and our nation's energy security. But supporting our energy industry doesn't mean excusing misconduct. A Plaquemines Parish jury in one of the most conservative, pro-oil communities in the country found Chevron liable after evidence showed it unlawfully discharged 4 billion gallons of toxic production wastewater into our marsh, causing long-term damage. The only question now is when Chevron will pay its judgment. Chevron’s attempt to enlist federal courts to undo its liability is a slap in the face of the Plaquemines Parish citizens living with the consequences of Chevron’s conduct. The only issues here are matters of State law, which belong in State court. #lalege
- Aug 24, 2026
I’ve never really ordered chicken in restaurants before (apart from like Nando’s). I just don’t really trust most places to get it right. But I’m noticing a trend of more and more people eating chicken in restaurants, and more and more restaurants claiming their chicken is delicious and juicy and so forth. Is restaurant chicken getting better? Dare I?
- Aug 26, 2026
GB news now
- Aug 24, 2026
Won’t somebody PLEASE think of the liberal comedians!? https://t.co/XaIhJFiMQm
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 132 interactions against 542K followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.586% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.
- What is Raheem J. Kassam's engagement rate on X?
- Raheem J. Kassam (@RaheemKassam) has an engagement rate of 0.024%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 542,453 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.024%, Raheem J. Kassam sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RaheemKassam have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RaheemKassam post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.