Back to @Rager's profile

Rager engagement report

@Rager - 200K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.03%
of 200K followers
Per impression
0.82%
7.4K views on a typical post
Reach
3.72%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
61
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 61 interactions against 200K followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.4K times each, and 0.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Rager's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 38% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.03%, Rager sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video59% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 59% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 209 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 202626x their median

    Me watching everyone make 6 figures while losing money on every trade I make https://t.co/geztH7abyg

    1.4K961301447K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20264.8x their median

    $USELESS is up 6x the past month Just insane price action, my best trade so far on centralized exchange accounts $60M -> $350M mcap in 4 weeks https://t.co/TtNjwvZSSy

    2501035025K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.9x their median

    I'm serious though about strength and $USELESS I sold a little spot $BTC and bought more USELESS at this area "but it's up so much" - I get that personally but at the same time USELESS price is at a place where I think if it breaks 0.32 it leads to --> 0.45 and new highs for 40% potential gains Will BTC hit 40% and over $110K in the new few weeks....personally I don't think so That's how I'm looking at it with my current targets when it breaks 0.32

    2021914019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.3x their median

    What if you could turn one of the internet’s most universally used financial symbols into a tradable crypto asset... For years, the rocket 🚀 has meant one thing in markets: Higher. Crypto goes up: 🚀 Stocks break out: 🚀 A company launches: 🚀 It has become a universal symbol for momentum, success, upside and markets taking off. But there is also a company that gives the symbol a literal meaning: SpaceX. SpaceX has become one of the most closely watched companies in the market because its potential extends far beyond launching rockets. If SpaceX succeeds, it will not simply participate in the space economy. It could become a major part of the infrastructure underneath it. There are very few companies with a story this ambitious and, in my opinion, very few offering comparable asymmetric potential if that long-term vision becomes reality. At the same time, one of crypto’s largest emerging opportunities is the tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs). Crypto has spent years building global, programmable financial rails. RWAs allow stocks, funds and other traditional assets to move onto those rails and interact with applications that could never exist inside a traditional brokerage account. @Robinhoodapp is positioning itself directly at the center of that opportunity. Robinhood Chain was built for financial services and tokenized real-world assets, allowing developers to combine traditional market exposure with crypto-native applications. That includes Robinhood Stock Tokens such as SPCX. According to Robinhood, every Stock Token in circulation is backed 1:1 by its corresponding underlying security held through a US-based custody partner. These products provide economic exposure through tokenized debt securities. The more interesting development is what builders can now create with these assets. Protocols such as @ponsdotfamily and @TheIndexFi are making headway in this area. IndexFi allows fees generated by a token launched on Pons to be routed into an automated treasury. That treasury can use those fees to purchase Robinhood Stock Tokens and distribute them directly to qualifying token holders. This creates an entirely new model: A memecoin can capture attention and trading volume while converting part of that activity into rewards paid in 1:1-backed Stock Tokens. The meme becomes a distribution layer for a real-world asset. @vladtenev recently described what developers are already building on Robinhood Chain: “For example, if you hold a memecoin, you get stock tokens airdropped to you.” He went on to describe developers connecting memecoins, core crypto assets and Stock Tokens to create products. That is important because Robinhood Chain is creating a programmable environment where memes, crypto and traditional assets can be combined into entirely new financial products. The 🚀 token was created as a direct expression of that idea. It has a 0% creator tax, while the creator-directed portion of Pons’ standard trading fees is routed to its IndexFi treasury and used to acquire Robinhood’s SPCX Stock Token. The resulting SPCX is distributed directly to qualifying 🚀 holders, with no staking and no manual claim required. The entire mechanism and its payouts can be verified through IndexFi: https://t.co/GgYmFTbsA9 Official 🚀 contract: 0x6B12ec435f15F823ee3C550e9013123e4187429B Trading activity in 🚀 generates rewards paid in Robinhood’s 1:1-backed SpaceX Stock Token. With 🚀, you are not simply buying another token that promises vague future utility. You are holding a culturally recognizable asset whose trading activity can periodically purchase and distribute exposure to the company most naturally associated with it. And the ticker is not “ROCKET.” The ticker is literally: 🚀 Any time someone uses the rocket emoji to represent a stock breaking out, crypto moving higher, a company launching or markets going “to the moon,” they are also using the ticker of the asset. The symbol existed before the token. The culture already understands it. The market already uses it. Now it has been paired with what I believe is one of the market’s most compelling growth stories and connected to a mechanism that rewards holders with tokenized SpaceX exposure. The universal symbol for markets going up paired with the company taking humanity up. 🚀

    11932401248K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.0x their median

    The failure of Hunter Biden's $LAPTOP launch and most people ignoring and focused on better coins is actually bullish overall for the market

    1716707.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.7x their median

    There's your solana:Dz9mQ9NzkBcCsuGPFJ3r1bS4wgqKMHBPiVuniW8Mbonk dip https://t.co/PgfiTjwpb1

    14381507.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20262.5x their median

    solana:Dz9mQ9NzkBcCsuGPFJ3r1bS4wgqKMHBPiVuniW8Mbonk chart almost as crazy as PONS https://t.co/BwGXNe9oJK

    1231018010K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.4x their median

    By the time everyone agrees Robinhood chain is pulling back it will time bottom is in and the eco will pump again as majority sell bottom and have to have to chase pumps The time to sell the top was like 10 days ago... you're late if calling local top for Robinhood chain now

    118422011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.1x their median

    If coins never dipped Nobody new would ever buy in Dips are healthy

    10991107.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20262.0x their median

    If you're trading onchain try to resist the fomo and just buy on the -50% to -70% pullbacks on these coins Better entry, less emotions just a quick video of a current coin and pattern/strategy I use when it comes to newer launched coins https://t.co/h5ufnr82UT

    10796120K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 61 interactions against 200K followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.4K times each, and 0.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

What is Rager's engagement rate on X?
Rager (@Rager) has an engagement rate of 0.03%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 199,648 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.03%, Rager sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Rager have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Rager post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going