Raffa Rants engagement report
@RaffaRants - 172K followers on X
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 172K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.756% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 2709x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cfc, #eveche, #pl.
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026. Recurring tags: #cfc, #eveche, #pl.
Compared with accounts its own size
Raffa Rants's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0%, Raffa Rants sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 19% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 19% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 67 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 19, 20262709x their median
THREE GOALS & THREE POINTS AT HOME! 💙🤍 https://t.co/ng3vyJSPJx
- Oct 19, 2026
Our Spurs side in N17 🫡 🔢 @krakenfx https://t.co/lXa5OAFwIY
- Sep 16, 2026703x their median
BREAKING: Chelsea confirm Clearlake will acquire the shares of Todd Boehly. As part of the transition, Clearlake will also acquire Mark Walter’s shares and therefore acquire full control of the Club. Chelsea says Hansjörg Wyss “will remain an important stakeholder and partner in the ownership group.” Todd Boehly leaves his role as Chairman and Chelsea say they are “well-positioned” for the next phase of the club’s development. 🗣️ Boehly: “It has been an honour to serve as Chairman of Chelsea Football Club. I would like to thank the many who helped secure a bright future for the Club, including the English Premier League, the coaches and players, the talented leadership and staff at Chelsea, and the legions of dedicated fans. “I have valued my partnership with Clearlake and the wider ownership group, and the collective decisions and investment we have made to support the immediate and long-term success of the Club. I am confident that Chelsea is well positioned for continued success under Clearlake’s leadership.” 🗣️ Behdad Eghbali and José E. Feliciano: “Todd has been an important partner throughout our ownership of Chelsea, and we thank him for his time and contribution as Chairman. He will always be a part of the Chelsea story and family. “Clearlake has served as Chelsea’s majority owner since 2022, and as we move to full control our focus is to continue investing in the Club’s infrastructure, sporting performance, player development and delivering long-term success for Chelsea and the Club’s supporters.” There will be no changes to the day-to-day operations, leadership or strategy at Chelsea.
- Sep 19, 2026644x their median
cole palmer is the most babied footballer in the world lol he’ll be shit for months on end and nobody will say shit but but he’ll be good for two games and they’ll be back telling you he’s one of the all time greats
- Oct 17, 2026
Pedro Neto had a good game today vs Everton, 2 goals. Fair enough. But if we are being honest, Noni Madueke is still the better winger than Pedro Neto. Madueke is more direct, better 1v1, and his decision making in the final third is just better. Neto gets the hype but Madueke gets the job done. #EVECHE
- Jun 6, 2026
To believe the @ChelseaFC ownership have actually learned from their failures and changed direction, the majority of these things need to happen by the end of the window. This list is in no particular order. 1. Sack at least 2 sporting directors (this is non-negotiable). 2. Owners must release a statement directly through Chelsea FC admitting they let fans down and made mistakes, plan moving forward. External interviews do not count.(this is non-negotiable) 3. Secure a front of shirt sponsor (this is non-negotiable). 4. Get a competent, winning manager that deserves to be here and fans can get behind (✅ done). 5. No ex-Brighton signings this window. Unless it's a needle mover. 6. No ex-City signings this window. Unless it's a needle mover. 7. Sell or freeze out 80% of this list: Datro Fofana, George, Kellyman, Disasi, Garnacho, Guiu, Gittens, Delap, Neto, Lavia, Fofana, Gusto, Chalobah, Badiashile, Tosin, Slonina, Jorgensen, Sanchez. 8. Reduce our reliance on injury-prone players. 9. Sign an established, proven goalkeeper and let Penders learn from him. 10. Bring in an established, proven CB that's a leader (this is non-negotiable). 11. Let no more than 1 of our big players leave unless we are replacing them with better. 12. Sign real experience and proven winners, not just players who are old or have played loads of games. 13. Make at least one statement signing. 14. Sort out the rest of the defence and get Chelsea back to being hard to beat. 15. Back Alonso. If he says he is looking for X position, I don't want him to backtrack because the club let him down (this is non-negotiable). 16. Two or three "now" signings (this is non-negotiable). I've probably missed some key ones. I'm going to be nice and say 70% of that should be done. Many might see this as unrealistic but it's not our problem to fix, they've had 4 years and got us into this mess, it's their mess to fix.
- Oct 17, 2026
Clean sheet. https://t.co/jAidUp5zRL
- Sep 18, 20262.7x their median
We have to stick it out with Alonso, going to be hard to defend these types of results but we can't go again sacking another manager.
- Oct 17, 2026
Acheampong is clear of Fofana, can't believe he took minutes off him last year.
- Sep 19, 2026
Over the last 5 years the thing that gets to me most is we seem to always get embarrassed every other week. Instead of losing 1-0 to a freak goal, whilst having high chance creation that wouldn't be fine but it would be acceptable to comprehend. Under every manager we've had and across the 100+ players we've used, we always have moments like yesterday where we get absolutely embarrassed or hand the opposition the game, which is the most frustrating thing about this. Fans at this point aren't asking to be winning titles (although that is the standard of this club), many of us are just asking for a non-eventful season without freak results and comfortably making top 4; we're not asking for much. No games are easy in the Premier League, but there are games you should be winning, and more often than not we are dropping points or struggling to compete. That's not entitlement; look at the betting markets, fan, and pundit predictions before we play games like yesterday. The stats back it up 21 prem games without a clean sheet going back to Jan. I just want Chelsea to go into a season where 90% of the time we get 3pts or a 1pt against teams we "should". 5% of the time when we do get beat against teams we should it's respectable. Just one season is all we ask, please @ChelseaFC
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 172K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.756% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 2709x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cfc, #eveche, #pl.
- What is Raffa Rants's engagement rate on X?
- Raffa Rants (@RaffaRants) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 171,672 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0%, Raffa Rants sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RaffaRants have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RaffaRants post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.