Rachel Nichols engagement report
@Rachel__Nichols - 1.1M followers on X
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 409 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 55K times each, and 0.749% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 34% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 96x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #giants, #gr8.
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #giants, #gr8.
Compared with accounts its own size
Rachel Nichols's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.038%, Rachel Nichols sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 34% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 14% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 34% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 171 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 25, 202696x their median
Dolly Parton has died at 80 https://t.co/sNMZIU8YLc
- Aug 4, 202685x their median
Klay Thompson didnât appreciate KDâs comment on Instagram đ âAye man, u good?â https://t.co/K0Zu33lIba
- Jul 26, 202662x their median
Every new addition officially acquired via trade/free agency through 6 weeks of the offseason. One of the craziest offseasons EVER https://t.co/pLwFqHp0YK
- Aug 12, 202657x their median
Russell Westbrook getting Michael B Jordan to narrate his retirement video is such a flex. Also a flex: being a first-ballot Hall of Famer who did it 100% his way, for 18(!) years. Russ's approach didn't sit well with everyone - but it was always genuine. After all, Why Not? https://t.co/foVWSmLtNN
- Aug 7, 202640x their median
Kirk Cousins and Maxx Crosby scuffled during Raidersâ practice Friday, via @ryanmcfadden_ : https://t.co/ATCwkyBFrJ
- Sep 28, 202631x their median
Kristaps Porzingis is out indefinitely to open training camp with a health issue, per Warriors. Another immediate blow to their depth.
- Oct 13, 202619x their median
TYLER BASS WINS IT FOR THE BILLS IN OT 𩬠https://t.co/o27ZxH82TL
- Jul 29, 202611x their median
The Warriors decided not to trade for Jaylen Brown because they felt he wouldnât be able to carry the franchise after Steph Curry retires, per @loganmmurdock âShould they have gotten in on the Jaylen Brown sweepstakes? The Warriors had an opportunity to trade for the former Celtic before the deadline in February, but couldnât build an organizational consensus that Brown would be the right player to carry the Warriors beyond the Curry era.â (Via https://t.co/BDyLWUZLRB)
- Jul 23, 20269.7x their median
Giannis responds to people who say he shouldâve married a model: âIâve heard so many things. âWhy is Giannis with this wife? He could be with a model. Not one model but ten!â But I am with my wife because she tells me the truth. She loves me, she will tell me whenever I do anything wrong. She will tell my kids the truth. I know that she will kill for my kids and she would even kill me for them. I know that she wonât let my kids get a big head, and thatâs the most important thing for me. I am in love. I am in love with her. As a woman and as a mother.â (Via Anesteathepodcast) â€ïž
- Sep 11, 20269.1x their median
I'm viewing this Niners-Rams game exclusively through the lens of which travel plan is winning.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 409 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 55K times each, and 0.749% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 34% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 96x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #giants, #gr8.
- What is Rachel Nichols's engagement rate on X?
- Rachel Nichols (@Rachel__Nichols) has an engagement rate of 0.038%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,086,279 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.038%, Rachel Nichols sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Rachel__Nichols have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Rachel__Nichols post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.