Richard Faulkerson© ⚡ engagement report
@R_FAULKERSoN - 918K followers on X
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 33 interactions against 918K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Posts are seen about 9.5K times each, and 0.349% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, Richard Faulkerson© ⚡ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 26 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Nov 14, 2024
PILIPINAS, MARAMING MARAMING SALAMAT PO SA PAGMAMAHAL NYO KAY JOY AT ETHAN! You are the reason behind the record-breaking success of Hello Love Again on its first day. MARAMING, MARAMING SALAMAT PO!!! #HelloLoveAgain SHOWING in 1000 theaters worldwide! ✈️ https://t.co/lbAeClo7Oq
- Oct 19, 2025
ST. JOEL VILLANUEVA IN HIS FULL BLOWN ACTOR ERA. A-MUST READ PO! “THE PASTOR, THE PORK, AND THE PENDING QUO WARRANTO: The Joel Villanueva Paradox” By: Tindig Pilipino/FB “I don’t intend to run anymore in public office.” Sabi ni Senator Joel Villanueva - parang isang confession na may halong pagod, guilt, at political survival instinct. Pero kung pakikinggan mo ang mga bulungan sa likod ng Senado, hindi raw ito voluntary exit - kundi strategic retreat bago pa siya mapatalsik. Ayon kay Nosy Tarsee, there’s talk of a quo warranto petition brewing - the same legal weapon na ginamit para patalsikin si Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno noong 2018. ⸻ ⚖️ The Ghost of 2016 Let’s rewind. In 2016, Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales ordered Joel Villanueva’s dismissal and perpetual disqualification from public office for misusing ₱10 million in PDAF funds intended for livelihood projects. The findings were damning - fake NGOs, ghost beneficiaries, and forged documents. The Ombudsman even forwarded the case to the Sandiganbayan, where malversation and falsification charges were filed - and to this day, no final resolution has been rendered. In short: the case is still pending, but the disqualification order still stands. ⸻ 🧾 The Senate’s Selective Blindness The Ombudsman’s decision was clear - dismissal and perpetual disqualification. Pero the Senate refused to enforce it, claiming “separation of powers.” In Tagalog: “Bahala na kami sa sarili naming dumi.” That move practically neutered the Ombudsman’s authority. Even Morales herself, in later interviews, said it made the country look like a joke in the eyes of the world - because the rule of law seemed optional for the powerful. ⸻ 🌊 Then Came the Flood (Control Scam) Fast forward to 2025 - DPWH District Engineer Henry Alcantara dropped his own bombshell before the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee. He named Villanueva among those who allegedly received kickbacks from anomalous flood control projects in Bulacan, amounting to hundreds of millions of pesos. Alcantara even testified that Villanueva requested around ₱1 billion in flood project allocations for his province. In short: mula sa Pork Barrel, ngayon Flood Barrel naman. And that makes the irony flood-level high - a preacher who once said “the righteous shall govern” now being accused of engineering a flood of corruption. ⸻ 📚 Quo Warranto 101 Now, what is this quo warranto thing everyone’s whispering about? It literally means “by what authority.” It’s a legal proceeding questioning a person’s right to hold a public office - and it’s precisely what ousted Sereno in 2018 despite her impeachment immunity. If the Ombudsman’s perpetual disqualification still stands - and if Villanueva’s Certificate of Candidacy (CoC) was filed while that decision remained in effect - then his eligibility to serve as senator is in question. That means his CoC could be void, and technically, he’s illegally occupying a Senate seat. As one electoral lawyer put it: 👉 “If his disqualification was never lifted, then the Senate is harboring an impostor under the law.” ⸻ 💀 The Death of the Aguinaldo Doctrine Villanueva reportedly invoked the Aguinaldo Doctrine, or the “Condonation Doctrine,” saying that reelection cleanses past sins. Pero sorry, Brother Joel - the Supreme Court already killed that doctrine in 2015 (Carpio-Morales v. CA and Binay Jr.). Wala nang “forgiven by reelection” defense. The people’s vote doesn’t erase the Ombudsman’s judgment. ⸻ 🕯️ A Test of Institutional Courage This issue now falls on the new Ombudsman - will he have the spine to enforce the 2016 decision? Because if not, it becomes a chilling message: “You can’t be punished if you’re powerful enough to pray on camera.” Public office is not an altar for redemption. It’s a test of accountability. And right now, Villanueva’s halo is hanging by a thread. #JoelVillanueva
- Mar 21, 2025
ALL RISE! 👑 Box Office King Alden Richards opens #BENCHBodyofWork - with his own take on the iconic Bench tank. https://t.co/GTXyG83tYN
- Aug 31, 2025
Thank you guys ♥️ tulong tayo tara.
- Jan 13, 202552x their median
Respect…please.
- Jun 22, 2025
Attention!! Cathay Pacific!!! @cathaypacific https://t.co/Xn2YSnnXRz
- Nov 9, 2024
YOU ARE BOTH SO LOVED 🤍 Look at that crowd ✨ #KathDen #HelloAgainTour KATHDEN INVADES CEBU https://t.co/Ee6yl8vUYe
- Apr 29, 202524x their median
https://t.co/D9SohnggyG
- Jun 13, 202522x their median
Purpose driven life… https://t.co/jY8ZcK19tT
- Jan 1, 202621x their median
https://t.co/jKZpUWHnbd
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 33 interactions against 918K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Posts are seen about 9.5K times each, and 0.349% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Richard Faulkerson© ⚡'s engagement rate on X?
- Richard Faulkerson© ⚡ (@R_FAULKERSoN) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 917,702 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, Richard Faulkerson© ⚡ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @R_FAULKERSoN have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @R_FAULKERSoN post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.