Back to @RWMaloneMD's profile

Robert W Malone, MD engagement report

@RWMaloneMD - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.09%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
2.31%
52K views on a typical post
Reach
3.91%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.093%
48 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 2.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 55% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 110K interactions, about 92x its own typical post.

Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Robert W Malone, MD's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 73% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.09%, Robert W Malone, MD sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.435%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,071 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,527 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 202692x their median

    This man would have changed the world. https://t.co/srAosWeJCz

    86K8.7K14K2.2K14M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202666x their median

    For those of you who aren’t aware, Jeremy Clarkson is in full remission from Cancer!🙏🏼

    75K2.5K1.1K1421.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202624x their median

    https://t.co/Q5jRYmQP7f

    23K5.0K343245146K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202623x their median

    Let's be clear - none of the three HHS secretaries under Presidents Obama and Biden held an MD or PhD. Kathleen Sebelius (Obama, 2009–2014): Held a Bachelor of Arts (Trinity Washington University) and a Master of Public Administration (University of Kansas). She did not have a doctorate or medical degree. Sylvia Mathews Burwell (Obama, 2014–2017) did not possess a master's, PhD, or other advanced degree. Xavier Becerra (Biden, 2021–2025): Held a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and a Juris Doctor (JD) from Stanford University. He is an attorney, not a medical doctor or PhD holder. So - why has mainstream media made such a BFD about Kennedy not being a scientist or MD? Why do they continue to hammer at this?

    20K6.2K995234290K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202614x their median

    Can you imagine waking up every morning knowing that a hostile foreign regime has reportedly put a $10 million bounty on your life? Knowing that Iran is trying to kill you and someone, somewhere is plotting to do it - for the money. And Barron Trump is only 20 years old. Barron did not choose this. He did not run for office. He did not make foreign policy. Yet this is the shadow he has to live under. I cannot imagine what that does to a young man, or to a mother who knows her son has been marked for death.

    12K2.6K2.1K203289K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20269.6x their median

    FDA REFUSED Moderna’s mRNA flu vaccine because the company hadn’t tested it against the vaccines seniors actually receive. Moderna called for White House intervention. Trump intervened. 14 days later, FDA reversed itself. The missing trial was never done. Instead, FDA approved the vaccine for seniors and moved the experiment to after licensure, when up to 800,000 people will determine whether it actually provides greater clinical protection. Meanwhile: • ~137 people must switch vaccines to prevent one additional case of flu. • For every 22 who switch, one additional person has a reaction severe enough to stop normal daily activity. • FDA found 29 unexplained/sudden/sudden-cardiac deaths vs. 12 in controls. No autopsies were performed on the mFLUSIVA deaths. • The FDA advisory panel voted 9–0. Twice. • For seniors, FDA approved on antibodies, not demonstrated superiority in illness, hospitalization or death over the enhanced vaccines they already receive. And this license can help lower the evidentiary burden for Moderna’s next mRNA vaccine. This isn't just a story about a flu shot. It is a story about what “FDA approved” now means. Read the investigation: https://t.co/LNQqUJKJXs

    7.3K3.4K406331324K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20229.1x their median

    Getting a COVID-19 booster while pregnant is not only smart, but safe. https://t.co/fr9PQdTdp0

    1.6K7477.0K1.5KView on X
  • Aug 18, 20268.5x their median

    We were told that marrying young is a recipe for divorce. Jill and I married at 18 and 19. Almost five decades later, we started looking at the actual research. It turns out age may not be the most important variable at all. Divorce runs in families. So does the age at which people marry. Children of divorce are more likely to marry other children of divorce, compounding the risk. Families appear to transmit not just whether we marry, but what we believe marriage is, how permanent we expect it to be, and when walking away becomes acceptable. Maybe the real question isn't, “Are you too young to marry?” Maybe it is: “Did you choose someone who was taught the same meaning of marriage that you were?” https://t.co/yAk9cu92r4

    9.0K80930730154K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20268.3x their median

    🚨 JUST IN: Florida is moving forward with ABOLISHING school vaccine mandates for 4 vaccines - Chickenpox - Hep B - Hib - Pneumococcal disease THIS IS AMAZING NEWS ☀️ LADAPO: “Every last one is wrong and DRIPS with disdain and slavery! Who am I, or anyone else, to tell YOU what you should put in your body? Who am I to tell you what your CHILD should put in their body? I don't have that right. Your body is a gift from God. What you put into your body is because of your relationship with your Body and God." (Last year) Parents can still vaccinate — but you don’t have to. Florida does it right.

    7.9K1.7K21896301K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20267.3x their median

    Flock cameras are just another step towards a security state. And frankly, I am rather disgusted by so many "conservative" influencers coming out in support of them. Huxley’s Brave New World imagined a society in which technological control became so normalized that people ceased to recognize it as control at all. Brave New Flock has an added irony: some of the loudest defenders of a privately operated, nationwide surveillance infrastructure now call themselves conservatives. There is nothing conservative about teaching Americans to accept ubiquitous cameras, centralized databases, automated tracking, and the routine recording of innocent people’s movements simply because the technology is sold under the banner of fighting crime. A conservative instinct once began with suspicion of concentrated power, especially the power to watch citizens who had done nothing wrong. Apparently, for a new class of “conservative” influencer, that principle is negotiable.

    6.3K2.0K2959060K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 2.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 55% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 110K interactions, about 92x its own typical post.

What is Robert W Malone, MD's engagement rate on X?
Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) has an engagement rate of 0.09%, based on the median interactions across 53 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,324,874 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.09%, Robert W Malone, MD sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RWMaloneMD have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RWMaloneMD post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going