Back to @RED's profile

(RED) engagement report

@RED - 853K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 853K followers
Per impression
0.429%
2.6K views on a typical post
Reach
0.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
11
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.77/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 11 interactions against 853K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.429% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 197x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

(RED)'s engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, (RED) sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video91% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link43% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 91% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 43% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 239 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 2026197x their median

    20 years ago, @Apple joined (RED) in the fight to end AIDS. When @tim_cook became CEO, that commitment grew, with Apple contributing over $250M to the @GlobalFund, impacting millions of lives. We’re deeply grateful for Tim’s leadership and lasting impact. Photo: Justin Sullivan https://t.co/Yu8nDPeVqP

    2.0K14810741K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202622x their median

    Rest in peace, Dolly Parton. Though best known for her songs and sequins, she was also an activist. Thank you, Dolly, for being a vocal supporter of the LGBTQIA+ community and for backing HIV/AIDS organizations at a time when doing so was taboo in country music. Photo: Ron Davis https://t.co/04TNzOVuz7

    20636103.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20267.6x their median

    Freddie Mercury's life was cut short 35 years ago due to complications from AIDS, a disease that is now preventable and treatable. Today, we'll be blasting Queen's "Don't Stop Me Now"—because he never let anything stop him—and when it comes to fighting AIDS, neither will we. https://t.co/QHAOreZLPQ

    6617104.6K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20265.1x their median

    Rest in peace, Daveigh Chase. Daveigh represents another life tragically taken by AIDS. While tremendous progress has been made in HIV prevention & treatment, AIDS-related illnesses continue to cause more than 570,000 deaths per year. The fight isn't over. Photo: Chris Pizzello https://t.co/RKQlu4s2Qd

    485304.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20264.2x their median

    19 years ago, Annie Leibovitz photographed 20 covers for @VanityFair’s landmark Africa Issue, guest-edited by (RED) co-founder Bono. The project united artists, leaders, and changemakers to raise awareness for the fight against AIDS in Africa. https://t.co/bzclHQQPSc

    3214004.8K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 20264.2x their median

    Remember when the Empire State Building turned (RED) for World AIDS Day? That was pretty cool. https://t.co/WGKn3V6T9Y

    3511001.6K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 20262.7x their median

    🏳️‍🌈 Happy Pride 🏳️‍🌈 The (RED) team had a blast celebrating Jersey Pride in Asbury Park, where we marched in the parade and talked with the community about (RED)'s work. https://t.co/BiHoKkD8Bt

    326201.7K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 20263.1x their median

    On this day in 1981, @NYTimes published an article about a "rare cancer seen in 41 homosexuals." It marked the first major news story about the disease that would later become known as AIDS. Today, HIV continues to affect millions of people around the world.⁣ https://t.co/78iDsf865D

    1815101.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.2x their median

    The end of AIDS as a crisis is finally within reach. What's needed now is action. When you SHOP (RED), your purchase helps fund life-saving healthcare programs. Thank you, @MSDInvents, for your longstanding support. https://t.co/KPjuDWO8RU

    164313.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.2x their median

    The US Open finals are played today in Arthur Ashe Stadium, named after the tennis legend. But Ashe left a legacy beyond tennis. After contracting HIV, he became one of the first major public figures to speak openly about AIDS, fighting the stigma around it when few others would. https://t.co/6W7p5emUPP

    177002.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 11 interactions against 853K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.429% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 197x its own typical post.

What is (RED)'s engagement rate on X?
(RED) (@RED) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 853,243 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, (RED) sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RED have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RED post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going