Back to @QvortrupHenrik's profile

Henrik Qvortrup engagement report

@QvortrupHenrik - 106K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.012%
of 106K followers
Per impression
0.178%
7.0K views on a typical post
Reach
6.59%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12
interactions (median)
Saved
0.007%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.17/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Saturday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 106K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 0.178% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 794 interactions, about 66x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.012%, Henrik Qvortrup sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link75% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 75% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 166 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 13, 202666x their median

    Så gik den - selvfølgelig - ikke længere. Thomas Nystrøm trækker sig med den forventelige begrundelse om ikke at ville "skygge". Men for Pia Olsen Dyhr er skaden sket: Hun har demonstreret et påfaldende usikkert jugement, og hendes autoritet som leder er stærkt formindsket.

    7041572329K viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 202655x their median

    Sidste år havde Troels Lund Poulsen sørget for F35-kulisse til sin folkemøde-tale. I år iscenesætter Mette F. sig således. Hvad med at lade russerne og nordkoreanerne ha' den slags virkemidler helt for sig selv? https://t.co/pu6VED0W78

    5762561021K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 202642x their median

    Skulle jeg bare ha skrevet under eget navn? https://t.co/OLXGlhT2yW

    457633339K viewsView on X
  • Jun 1, 202640x their median

    Sgu meget fermt og smart af formanden for det Kongelige Danske Socialdemokrati at tilrettelægge et ni uger langt forhandlingsforløb, så det kulminerer med royalt showoff ombord på Dannebrog. Måske man ligefrem kan stramme den til at sige, at det er FOR fermt og smart. https://t.co/w09GjCoMHl

    35216102443K viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 202634x their median

    Tak til @QvortrupHenrik for at tage debatten op om uenigheden mellem mig og @politiken . Vi er mildest talt meget uenige om deres håndtering og dækning af min retssag mod Asmaa Abdol Hamid. Jeg forklarer, hvordan de efter min opfattelse har gjort sig selv til aktører i en verserende retssag, og hvor absurd jeg finder det, at de stiller sig på den dømte parts side frem for at bakke op om en kollega. Tak også til Lotte Folke for en civiliseret debat.

    3851610211K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202627x their median

    Jeg er med på, at en undersøgelse blandt B.T.-læsere ikke er videnskabelig. Men den er dog et fingerpeg om, at lavere moms måske ikke helt er det folkelige hit, som mange på Christiansborg går rundt og tror. https://t.co/oRjan1qw95

    2462059215K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202617x their median

    Alt det bizarre ved kongehuset i bare én sætning. https://t.co/Py2YuUgrAS

    178229028K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20265.8x their median

    Bob lagde dovent korpus til, da jeg under optagelserne til denne uges UdenFilter forsøgte mig som Christian "Rambo" @RabjergMadsen Lyt her: https://t.co/mc2vs2BY6M https://t.co/TJjRdug84K

    5801207.9K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 20265.4x their median

    Engang kaldte han mig "et svin". I denne uge har Naser Khader for et øjeblik smidt præstekjolen og er min gæstevært i Q&Co. Lyt her: https://t.co/HwLpurL9ev https://t.co/DtJ0Qx5vBG

    4701808.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.1x their median

    For første gang i ti år stiller hun op til interview. Det sker i Q&Co. Hør det her: https://t.co/94HQdZDDzI https://t.co/YsMmXA6Nmp

    30018126K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 106K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 0.178% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 794 interactions, about 66x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Henrik Qvortrup's engagement rate on X?
Henrik Qvortrup (@QvortrupHenrik) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 106,305 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.012%, Henrik Qvortrup sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @QvortrupHenrik have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @QvortrupHenrik post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going