Back to @Queensberry's profile

Queensberry Promotions engagement report

@Queensberry - 298K followers on X

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.007%
of 298K followers
Per impression
0.277%
7.6K views on a typical post
Reach
2.55%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
21
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 298K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 0.277% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.55% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 59x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #duboiswardley2, #homeoftheheavyweights, #wardleydubois2.

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026. Recurring tags: #duboiswardley2, #homeoftheheavyweights, #wardleydubois2.

Compared with accounts its own size

Queensberry Promotions's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, Queensberry Promotions sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 132 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 202659x their median

    DDD at his very best ๐Ÿ˜… #DuboisWardley2 | Oct 17 | The O2, London | DAZN https://t.co/10CyiP03Hs

    1.0K6410075805K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202622x their median

    ๐˜ฝ๐™„๐™‚ ๐˜ฝ๐˜ผ๐™‰๐™‚โ€™๐™Ž ๐™‹๐™Š๐™’๐™€๐™ ๐™Š๐™‰ ๐™๐™๐™‡๐™‡ ๐˜ฟ๐™„๐™Ž๐™‹๐™‡๐˜ผ๐™”๐Ÿ’ฅ Zhilei Zhang put Deontay Wilder away in devastating fashion, stopping the Bronze Bomber in the fifth round ๐ŸฅŠ https://t.co/EU0xH1oK26

    4362655190K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 202619x their median

    INCREDIBLE ๐Ÿ’ฅ Daniel Dubois DEFEATS Wardley inside two BRUTAL rounds ๐Ÿ”ฅ #DuboisWardley2 https://t.co/eE2ON9QIt5

    3055872140K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202618x their median

    ๐ƒ๐Ž๐”๐๐‹๐„ ๐Š๐๐Ž๐‚๐Š๐ƒ๐Ž๐–๐ ๐Ÿ’ฅ George Groves sent Paul Smith to the canvas twice in the second round before bringing the fight to an end ๐Ÿ”ฅ https://t.co/m0ae2eGtuI

    33918247119K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202618x their median

    ๐‘ป๐‘ฏ๐‘ถ๐‘บ๐‘ฌ ๐‘ฉ๐‘ถ๐‘ซ๐’€๐‘บ๐‘ฏ๐‘ถ๐‘ป๐‘บ ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ A young Ricky Hatton unleashed a vicious flurry of body shots to stop Tommy Peacock inside two rounds ๐Ÿฉต https://t.co/GvcXRqFUw2

    3323244179K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202613x their median

    Down at the end of the 9th, finished in the 10th ๐Ÿคฏ Joe Calzaghe and Richie Woodhall delivered a British thriller back in 2000 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง https://t.co/r4zpI2Q7pi

    2332412126K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 202611x their median

    IMMEDIATE RINGSIDE REACTION ๐Ÿ’ฅ Noel Gallagher, Luke Littler, Rob Beckett, Matt Smith, Paddy Considine and Kelly Osborne react to a WILD Daniel Dubois performance ๐Ÿ”ฅ #DuboisWardley2 https://t.co/3rSmzEKZ9w

    15914526293K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202610x their median

    Daniel Dubois & Fabio Wardley have heated exchange ๐Ÿ˜ณ #DuboisWardley2 | Oct 17 | The O2, London | @DAZNBoxing https://t.co/GbW5WFvOdr

    16819121250K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20269.8x their median

    Huge respect to Fabio Wardley, a warrior through and through and gave us fight of the year earlier this year. Ipswichโ€™s own ๐Ÿšœ ๐ŸฅŠ https://t.co/yYoYXOTslr

    18516409.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20267.7x their median

    Final prep before a World Title BANGER ๐Ÿ’ฅ #DuboisWardley2 | NOW | The O2, London | DAZN https://t.co/L70DkQ1Rli

    14594426K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#duboiswardley2#homeoftheheavyweights#wardleydubois2

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 298K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 0.277% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.55% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 59x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #duboiswardley2, #homeoftheheavyweights, #wardleydubois2.

What is Queensberry Promotions's engagement rate on X?
Queensberry Promotions (@Queensberry) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 297,625 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, Queensberry Promotions sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Queensberry have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Queensberry post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going