Back to @QueenAnticommie's profile

Anticommie engagement report

@QueenAnticommie - 262K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.056%
of 262K followers
Per impression
2.72%
5.4K views on a typical post
Reach
2.06%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
148
interactions (median)
Saved
0.037%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.37/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 148 interactions against 262K followers, an engagement rate of 0.056%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.4K times each, and 2.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 53K interactions, about 361x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Anticommie's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.056%, Anticommie sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video47% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 47% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 166 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 4, 2026361x their median

    The legend of his greatness will be spoken about for generations to come. https://t.co/3fnsrK7mT9

    49K3.7K17598685K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202698x their median

    WILD: Florida plastic surgeon Tomasz Kosowski, 47, who is representing himself in his death-penalty murder trial, requests a physical courtroom demonstration as he fights allegations that he murdered attorney Steven Cozzi, 41, inside a Largo law office on March 21, 2023, and disposed of his body. Cozzi’s remains have never been found. Kosowski has pleaded not guilty. The extraordinary moment unfolded during his ongoing trial in Clearwater, Florida, which began September 14. WATCH

    13K8364511142.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202690x their median

    This is still the best and most iconic photo of 2026 from a Team USA player. It might be the best for a decade or more. https://t.co/pAyMDmTHV9

    13K67248973K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202641x their median

    IN THE LAST DAYS, GOOD WILL BE CALLED EVIL, AND EVIL CALLED GOOD. Isaiah 5:20

    5.2K6521274264K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20268.8x their median

    Legendary comment. 🤣 https://t.co/0GfwHbBekO

    1.2K6310322K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20266.6x their median

    James Talarico’s resume: Texting middle school girls at midnight. Paying Marc Elias $26k for consulting. Accepting $10M from Reid Hoffman, the same guy who brought ice cream to the girls on Epstein Island. Democrats looked at that résumé and said Senate. Isn’t that interesting? https://t.co/JApziA4nCw

    607302372725K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20265.4x their median

    It’s cool to be white. It’s cool to be black. It’s cool to be Asian. It’s cool to be Hispanic. It’s cool to be whoever you are. But NO-ONE is cool with someone eating a steak well-done. 😤

    6952964821K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20264.6x their median

    If you have money to go eat out, but not money to give out a tip… Then you don’t have enough money to go eat out.

    429362081524K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20264.3x their median

    Honestly, I think I’m gonna get the shingles vaccine I’ve had shingles before and it is hell I got it while sleeping at the hospital for two weeks after one of my mom’s surgeries

    25811355621K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20263.2x their median

    JD Vance’s anti-fraud task force removed 760,000 fraudulent Obamacare enrollments. Now you know why healthcare is so expensive nowadays.

    394512826.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 148 interactions against 262K followers, an engagement rate of 0.056%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.4K times each, and 2.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 53K interactions, about 361x its own typical post.

What is Anticommie's engagement rate on X?
Anticommie (@QueenAnticommie) has an engagement rate of 0.056%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 262,311 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.056%, Anticommie sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @QueenAnticommie have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @QueenAnticommie post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going