Back to @QamarAnchor's profile

Qamar ЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│ engagement report

@QamarAnchor - 242K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.789%
of 242K followers
Per impression
5.90%
32K views on a typical post
Reach
13.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.086%
28 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.2/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 242K followers, an engagement rate of 0.789%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 5.90% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ndtvno1, #whenitreallymatters.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026. Recurring tags: #ndtvno1, #whenitreallymatters.

Compared with accounts its own size

Qamar ЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│'s engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 90% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.789%, Qamar ЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│ sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.499% to 2.09%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 172 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 202611x their median

    рдЬрдм рдЖрд░реЛрдк рдЕрдкрдиреА рд╕реАрдорд╛ рд▓рд╛рдВрдШрддреЗ рд╣реИрдВ, рддрдм рдХрд╛рдиреВрди рдЕрдкрдиреА рд▓рдХреАрд░ рдЦреАрдВрдЪрддрд╛ рд╣реИред тАЛтВ╣2 рдХрд░реЛрдбрд╝ рдХрд╛ рдорд╛рдирд╣рд╛рдирд┐ рдХрд╛ рдореБрдХрджрдорд╛ред рдХрд▓ рдпрд╣ рдорд╛рдирд╣рд╛рдирд┐ рдорд╛рдорд▓рд╛ рдорд╛рдирдиреАрдп рджрд┐рд▓реНрд▓реА рдЙрдЪреНрдЪ рдиреНрдпрд╛рдпрд╛рд▓рдп рдХреЗ рд╕рдордХреНрд╖ рд╕реБрдирд╡рд╛рдИ рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рд╕реВрдЪреАрдмрджреНрдз рд╣реЛрдЧрд╛ред тАЛрдирд╛ рдХреЛрдИ рд╕реЛрд╢рд▓ рдореАрдбрд┐рдпрд╛ рдЯреНрд░рд╛рдпрд▓ред рдирд╛ рдмрдпрд╛рдиреЛрдВ рдХреА рдЬрдВрдЧред рд╕рд┐рд░реНрдл рддрдереНрдп, рд╕рдмреВрдд рдФрд░ рдХрд╛рдиреВрди рдХрд╛ рд░рд╛рдЬред тАЛрд╕рдЪ рдХреА рдкрд░реАрдХреНрд╖рд╛ рд╡рд╣реАрдВ рд╣реЛрдЧреА рдЬрд╣рд╛рдБ рд╣реЛрдиреА рдЪрд╛рд╣рд┐рдПтАФрдЕрджрд╛рд▓рдд рдореЗрдВред

    16K3.3K1.1K242849K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20264.0x their median

    SC/ST Act рднрд╛рд░рдд рдХреЛ рдмрд░реНрдмрд╛рдж рдХрд░ рджреЗрдЧрд╛ ... рд╕реНрд╡рддрдВрддреНрд░рдд рднрд╛рд░рджреНрд╡рд╛рдЬ рдХреЛ 14 рджрд┐рдиреЛрдВ рдХреА рдиреНрдпрд╛рдпрд┐рдХ рд╣рд┐рд░рд╛рд╕рдд рдореЗрдВ рднреЗрдЬ рджрд┐рдпрд╛ рдЧрдпрд╛, рдЕрдЧрд▓реА рд╕реБрдирд╡рд╛рдИ 14 рджрд┐рдиреЛрдВ рдмрд╛рдж рд╣реЛрдЧреА.. рдХреЛрдИ рдЬрд╛рдирдмреБрдЭрдХрд░ SC/ST Act рд▓рдЧрд╛ рджреЗрддрд╛ рд╣реИ? рдлрд┐рд░ рдХрд┐рд╕реА рд╡реНрдпрдХреНрддрд┐ рдХреА рдЬрд┐рдВрджрдЧреА рддреБрд░рдВрдд рдмрд░реНрдмрд╛рдж рд╣реЛ рдЬрд╛рддреА рд╣реИ... рдХреНрдпрд╛ рдпрд╣реА рднрд╛рд░рдд рдХреА рдиреНрдпрд╛рдп рд╡реНрдпрд╡рд╕реНрдерд╛ рд╣реИрдВ? https://t.co/UpmVUDVLXr

    5.3K2.3K922365K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.3x their median

    рдореЛрджреАрдЬреА рдЗрд╕ рд▓рдбрд╝рдХреА рдХреЗ рдКрдкрд░ рдЬрд▓реНрджреА рд╕реЗ SC ST рдПрдХреНрдЯ рдФрд░ NSA рд▓рдЧрд╡рд╛рдУ.... рдпреЗ рдЖрдкрдХреЗ рдиреАрд▓реЗ рдХрдмреВрддрд░реЛрдВ рдХреЗ рдЦрд┐рд▓рд╛рдл рдРрд╕реЗ рдХреИрд╕реЗ рдмреЛрд▓ рд╕рдХрддреА рд╣реИред рдореИ рддреЛ рдХрд╣рддрд╛ рд╣реВрдБ рдЗрд╕ рд▓рдбрд╝рдХреА рдХреЗ рд╕рд╛рде рдЗрд╕рдХреЗ рдорд╛рдВ рдмрд╛рдк ,рднрд╛рдИ рдмрд╣рди ,рдЪрд╛рдЪрд╛ рддрд╛рдК, рдФрд░ рдЗрд╕рдХреЗ рдкреВрд░реЗ рдЧрд╛рдБрд╡рд╡рд╛рд▓реЛрдВ рдкрд░ SC ST рдПрдХреНрдЯ рд▓рдЧрд╡рд╛ рджреЛ рдореЛрджреАрдЬреАред https://t.co/rgTAn0iB7E

    3.1K1.1K582249K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.7x their median

    рдЬреБрдЧ-рдЬреБрдЧ рдЬрд┐рдпреЛ @SachinPilot https://t.co/3lTgSBNKNR

    2.8K295411647K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    рдкрд╛рдкрд╛ рдореЛрджреА рдЬреА рдиреЗ рд╡рд╛рд░ рд░реБрдХрд╡рд╛ рджреА- рдкрд╛рд░реНрдЯ-рдЯреВ- https://t.co/AxgnXEVWiY

    473122311218K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    рдпрд╣реА рд╡реЛ рдирдлрд░рддреА рдХреАрдбрд╝рд╛ рд╣реИ рдЬрд┐рд╕реЗ рдмрд┐рд╣рд╛рд░ рдкреБрд▓рд┐рд╕ рдиреЗ рдЧрд┐рд░рдлреНрддрд╛рд░ рдХрд┐рдпрд╛ рд╣реИред рдЗрддрдиреА рдШрдЯрд┐рдпрд╛ рдФрд░ рдмреЗрд╣реБрджрд╛ рднрд╛рд╖рд╛ рдмреЛрд▓рдиреЗ рд╡рд╛рд▓реЗ рдФрд░ рдЙрд╕рдХрд╛ рд╕рдорд░реНрдерди рдХрд░рдиреЗ рд╡рд╛рд▓реЛрдВ рдХреА рдорд╛рдирд╕рд┐рдХрддрд╛ рдХрд┐рддрдиреА рд╕рдбрд╝реА рд╣реБрдИ рд╣реЛрдЧреА рдЙрд╕рдХрд╛ рдЕрдВрджрд╛рдЬрд╛ рдЗрд╕ рд╡реАрдбрд┐рдпреЛрдВ рд╕реЗ рд▓рдЧрд╛рдЗрдП ред https://t.co/pyzoYZrO1s

    1445323312K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    рддреАрди рдЪреИрдирд▓ рддреАрдиреЛрдВ рдирдВрдмрд░ рд╡рди рдлреИрд╕рд▓рд╛ рд╕рд╛рдлрд╝ рд╣реИ рджрд░реНрд╢рдХ NDTV рдХреЗ рд╕рд╛рде рд╣реИ рдЗрд╕реЗ рдХрд╣рддреЗ рд╣реИ тАШрджрдмрджрдмрд╛тАЩ #NDTVno1 #WhenItReallyMatters https://t.co/vAEzWArOZf

    173141566.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    рдпреЗ рдорд╣рд┐рд▓рд╛ рдЖрдЬ рдЗрддрдиреА рд╡рд╛рдпрд░рд▓ рдХреНрдпреВрдБ рд╣реИ? https://t.co/KSfMjSkb4q

    61003.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ndtvno1#whenitreallymatters

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 242K followers, an engagement rate of 0.789%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 5.90% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ndtvno1, #whenitreallymatters.

What is Qamar ЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│'s engagement rate on X?
Qamar ЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│ (@QamarAnchor) has an engagement rate of 0.789%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 241,965 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.789%, Qamar ЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│ sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @QamarAnchor have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @QamarAnchor post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going