Qamar ЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│ engagement report
@QamarAnchor - 242K followers on X
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 242K followers, an engagement rate of 0.789%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 5.90% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ndtvno1, #whenitreallymatters.
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026. Recurring tags: #ndtvno1, #whenitreallymatters.
Compared with accounts its own size
Qamar ЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│'s engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 90% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.789%, Qamar ЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│ sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.499% to 2.09%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 172 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 8, 202611x their median
рдЬрдм рдЖрд░реЛрдк рдЕрдкрдиреА рд╕реАрдорд╛ рд▓рд╛рдВрдШрддреЗ рд╣реИрдВ, рддрдм рдХрд╛рдиреВрди рдЕрдкрдиреА рд▓рдХреАрд░ рдЦреАрдВрдЪрддрд╛ рд╣реИред тАЛтВ╣2 рдХрд░реЛрдбрд╝ рдХрд╛ рдорд╛рдирд╣рд╛рдирд┐ рдХрд╛ рдореБрдХрджрдорд╛ред рдХрд▓ рдпрд╣ рдорд╛рдирд╣рд╛рдирд┐ рдорд╛рдорд▓рд╛ рдорд╛рдирдиреАрдп рджрд┐рд▓реНрд▓реА рдЙрдЪреНрдЪ рдиреНрдпрд╛рдпрд╛рд▓рдп рдХреЗ рд╕рдордХреНрд╖ рд╕реБрдирд╡рд╛рдИ рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рд╕реВрдЪреАрдмрджреНрдз рд╣реЛрдЧрд╛ред тАЛрдирд╛ рдХреЛрдИ рд╕реЛрд╢рд▓ рдореАрдбрд┐рдпрд╛ рдЯреНрд░рд╛рдпрд▓ред рдирд╛ рдмрдпрд╛рдиреЛрдВ рдХреА рдЬрдВрдЧред рд╕рд┐рд░реНрдл рддрдереНрдп, рд╕рдмреВрдд рдФрд░ рдХрд╛рдиреВрди рдХрд╛ рд░рд╛рдЬред тАЛрд╕рдЪ рдХреА рдкрд░реАрдХреНрд╖рд╛ рд╡рд╣реАрдВ рд╣реЛрдЧреА рдЬрд╣рд╛рдБ рд╣реЛрдиреА рдЪрд╛рд╣рд┐рдПтАФрдЕрджрд╛рд▓рдд рдореЗрдВред
- Sep 8, 20264.0x their median
SC/ST Act рднрд╛рд░рдд рдХреЛ рдмрд░реНрдмрд╛рдж рдХрд░ рджреЗрдЧрд╛ ... рд╕реНрд╡рддрдВрддреНрд░рдд рднрд╛рд░рджреНрд╡рд╛рдЬ рдХреЛ 14 рджрд┐рдиреЛрдВ рдХреА рдиреНрдпрд╛рдпрд┐рдХ рд╣рд┐рд░рд╛рд╕рдд рдореЗрдВ рднреЗрдЬ рджрд┐рдпрд╛ рдЧрдпрд╛, рдЕрдЧрд▓реА рд╕реБрдирд╡рд╛рдИ 14 рджрд┐рдиреЛрдВ рдмрд╛рдж рд╣реЛрдЧреА.. рдХреЛрдИ рдЬрд╛рдирдмреБрдЭрдХрд░ SC/ST Act рд▓рдЧрд╛ рджреЗрддрд╛ рд╣реИ? рдлрд┐рд░ рдХрд┐рд╕реА рд╡реНрдпрдХреНрддрд┐ рдХреА рдЬрд┐рдВрджрдЧреА рддреБрд░рдВрдд рдмрд░реНрдмрд╛рдж рд╣реЛ рдЬрд╛рддреА рд╣реИ... рдХреНрдпрд╛ рдпрд╣реА рднрд╛рд░рдд рдХреА рдиреНрдпрд╛рдп рд╡реНрдпрд╡рд╕реНрдерд╛ рд╣реИрдВ? https://t.co/UpmVUDVLXr
- Sep 8, 20262.3x their median
рдореЛрджреАрдЬреА рдЗрд╕ рд▓рдбрд╝рдХреА рдХреЗ рдКрдкрд░ рдЬрд▓реНрджреА рд╕реЗ SC ST рдПрдХреНрдЯ рдФрд░ NSA рд▓рдЧрд╡рд╛рдУ.... рдпреЗ рдЖрдкрдХреЗ рдиреАрд▓реЗ рдХрдмреВрддрд░реЛрдВ рдХреЗ рдЦрд┐рд▓рд╛рдл рдРрд╕реЗ рдХреИрд╕реЗ рдмреЛрд▓ рд╕рдХрддреА рд╣реИред рдореИ рддреЛ рдХрд╣рддрд╛ рд╣реВрдБ рдЗрд╕ рд▓рдбрд╝рдХреА рдХреЗ рд╕рд╛рде рдЗрд╕рдХреЗ рдорд╛рдВ рдмрд╛рдк ,рднрд╛рдИ рдмрд╣рди ,рдЪрд╛рдЪрд╛ рддрд╛рдК, рдФрд░ рдЗрд╕рдХреЗ рдкреВрд░реЗ рдЧрд╛рдБрд╡рд╡рд╛рд▓реЛрдВ рдкрд░ SC ST рдПрдХреНрдЯ рд▓рдЧрд╡рд╛ рджреЛ рдореЛрджреАрдЬреАред https://t.co/rgTAn0iB7E
- Sep 7, 20261.7x their median
рдЬреБрдЧ-рдЬреБрдЧ рдЬрд┐рдпреЛ @SachinPilot https://t.co/3lTgSBNKNR
- Sep 9, 2026
рдкрд╛рдкрд╛ рдореЛрджреА рдЬреА рдиреЗ рд╡рд╛рд░ рд░реБрдХрд╡рд╛ рджреА- рдкрд╛рд░реНрдЯ-рдЯреВ- https://t.co/AxgnXEVWiY
- Sep 9, 2026
рдпрд╣реА рд╡реЛ рдирдлрд░рддреА рдХреАрдбрд╝рд╛ рд╣реИ рдЬрд┐рд╕реЗ рдмрд┐рд╣рд╛рд░ рдкреБрд▓рд┐рд╕ рдиреЗ рдЧрд┐рд░рдлреНрддрд╛рд░ рдХрд┐рдпрд╛ рд╣реИред рдЗрддрдиреА рдШрдЯрд┐рдпрд╛ рдФрд░ рдмреЗрд╣реБрджрд╛ рднрд╛рд╖рд╛ рдмреЛрд▓рдиреЗ рд╡рд╛рд▓реЗ рдФрд░ рдЙрд╕рдХрд╛ рд╕рдорд░реНрдерди рдХрд░рдиреЗ рд╡рд╛рд▓реЛрдВ рдХреА рдорд╛рдирд╕рд┐рдХрддрд╛ рдХрд┐рддрдиреА рд╕рдбрд╝реА рд╣реБрдИ рд╣реЛрдЧреА рдЙрд╕рдХрд╛ рдЕрдВрджрд╛рдЬрд╛ рдЗрд╕ рд╡реАрдбрд┐рдпреЛрдВ рд╕реЗ рд▓рдЧрд╛рдЗрдП ред https://t.co/pyzoYZrO1s
- Sep 9, 2026
рддреАрди рдЪреИрдирд▓ рддреАрдиреЛрдВ рдирдВрдмрд░ рд╡рди рдлреИрд╕рд▓рд╛ рд╕рд╛рдлрд╝ рд╣реИ рджрд░реНрд╢рдХ NDTV рдХреЗ рд╕рд╛рде рд╣реИ рдЗрд╕реЗ рдХрд╣рддреЗ рд╣реИ тАШрджрдмрджрдмрд╛тАЩ #NDTVno1 #WhenItReallyMatters https://t.co/vAEzWArOZf
- Sep 8, 2026
рдпреЗ рдорд╣рд┐рд▓рд╛ рдЖрдЬ рдЗрддрдиреА рд╡рд╛рдпрд░рд▓ рдХреНрдпреВрдБ рд╣реИ? https://t.co/KSfMjSkb4q
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 242K followers, an engagement rate of 0.789%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 5.90% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ndtvno1, #whenitreallymatters.
- What is Qamar ЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│'s engagement rate on X?
- Qamar ЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│ (@QamarAnchor) has an engagement rate of 0.789%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 241,965 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.789%, Qamar ЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│ sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @QamarAnchor have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @QamarAnchor post?
- Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.