Back to @QIUandCorgi's profile

秋和柯基 engagement report

@QIUandCorgi - 314K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.008%
of 314K followers
Per impression
0.11%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
6.93%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
24
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 314K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 786x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

秋和柯基's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 6% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, 秋和柯基 sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video74% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 48 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 11, 2026786x their median

    今天的花絮 https://t.co/oBUNaDtvgx

    18K3342213291K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 2026383x their median

    欸?痴女属性暴露 https://t.co/qIwts0eUjN

    8.6K1554661304K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026380x their median

    师尊,不是说扮成母猪就没事了吗?为什么魔宗还要我们叠起来啊? 宗门: @TiTi40511552 @tiedanApril @GovoeJ @angelij1n https://t.co/N199vT0H9N

    8.5K548462181K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 2026172x their median

    看看50Kg时的我。 现在已经60Kg了🥹 https://t.co/nQcVUNiXfb

    3.8K712730168K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202690x their median

    和@xinglanlans 亲嘴了嘿嘿 https://t.co/fjNIgz6zjL

    2.0K69480116K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202687x their median

    牛来 https://t.co/K9h5IAqrld

    2.0K6629272K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202658x their median

    对魔忍 https://t.co/ye3T4Pkzq5

    1.3K666138K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202653x their median

    喜欢这张,好有妈感❤️ 自拍(含视频)合集获取➡️私信口令🧧98 https://t.co/1uGPtnHiYi

    1.1K17179193K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202648x their median

    对魔忍 你们喜欢看谁的战败版本? https://t.co/TfHfMNbmWj

    1.0K10110229K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202646x their median

    七夕快乐 https://t.co/Fgyc0n270w

    1.0K1764129K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 314K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 786x its own typical post.

What is 秋和柯基's engagement rate on X?
秋和柯基 (@QIUandCorgi) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 314,158 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, 秋和柯基 sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @QIUandCorgi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @QIUandCorgi post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going