Back to @PutaLocuraXXX's profile

PutaLocura engagement report

@PutaLocuraXXX - 391K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.026%
of 391K followers
Per impression
0.813%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
3.14%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
100
interactions (median)
Saved
0.244%
30 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.37/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 100 interactions against 391K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.813% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 92% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 175x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

PutaLocura's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.026%, PutaLocura sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link92% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 92% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 368 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 20, 2026175x their median

    La BBC de Londres regalándonos un cierre que trascenderá en la historia del mundo. ¡Gracias! https://t.co/sgNHgsyPyn

    14K3.3K89168442K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026155x their median

    Ready to have your mind blown? Senator John Kennedy on Elon Musk and DOGE exposing USAID, “I'll tell you what Mr. Musk discovered. I find it fascinating. He discovered: - The American taxpayers are giving money to Afghanistan - He found that we are giving money to Yemen - He found that we are giving money to Syria - He found that the USAID has 10,000 people employees, and every year they give away $40 billion - He found that the USAID gave money to support electric vehicles in Vietnam. Our money, taxpayer money - He found that the USAID gave money to a transgender clinic in India. “I didn't know that. I bet you the American people didn't know that” - He found that USAID gave $1.5 million to a Serbian LGBTQ group, they got $1.5 million to QUOTE, “advanced diversity, equity, inclusion in Serbia's workplaces and business communities” - They found that USAID spent $164 million to support radical organizations around the world - They gave $122 million of that to groups aligned with foreign terrorist organizations - According to this report in Mr. Musk, the USAID has given millions of dollars to quote organizations in Gaza controlled by Hamas - He found that we gave $2 million, USAID did, for sex changes in Guatemala - He found that we gave $20 million to produce a new Sesame Street show in Iraq - He found that we gave $4.5 million of taxpayer money to combat misinformation in Kazakhstan - He found that we gave $10 million, USAID did, of meals to an al-Qaeda-linked terrorist group called the Nusra Front - Mr. Musk found that we gave $7.9 million of taxpayer money to a project that would teach Sri Lankan journalists to avoid binary gendered language. (The USAID took 8 million bucks and gave it to a bunch of journalists in Sri Lanka to teach them how to avoid binary gendered language) - USAID gave $1.5 million to promote LGBT advocacy in Jamaica - They gave $1.5 million to rebuild the Cuban media ecosystem - They gave $1.5 million for quote, art for inclusion of people with disabilities in Belarus - Another $3.9 million for LGBT causes in Macedonia - $8.3 million for equity and inclusion education in Nepal “I could go all night and many of my colleagues are upset. They're really mad at Mr. Musk. Hell, I think we ought to give him a medal”

    10K4.4K383308177K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202647x their median

    Les traigo nostalgia de la buena. 🥺 https://t.co/MT4ZuGJhwX

    4.2K3896275318K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202646x their median

    JAJJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJA Por esto pago yo internet https://t.co/fbYvbg7vpo

    3.8K7793652388K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 202617x their median

    Les puedo asegurar QUE LA PEOR BASURA HUMANA que he conocido en mi vida, es la que medra en la escombrera de los platos de televisión. Detrás del maquillaje, los blanqueamientos dentales y la venta de personajes construidos para ustedes hay un gran vacío humano y moral y auténticos monstruos que se alimentan de su apetito codicioso y narcisista, capaces de lo inimaginable con tal de tener la gracia de su dios, la audiencia, un día más. Sinceramente me extraña, que esto no pase más…

    1.3K22313717117K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 202616x their median

    Viva España 🇪🇸 https://t.co/JJpJnDL5pp

    1.5K387260K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20266.1x their median

    Estas son las nuevas directrices de la UE para reducir la cobertura sexualizada de las atletas: Pide ángulos respetuosos que muestren técnica y rendimiento y evitar tomas bajas, primeros planos del cuerpo y cámara lenta innecesaria. _ Documento completo: https://t.co/eNLiCFT1Hu _

    336701881966K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.7x their median

    Estos son los pequeños milagros del porno, un día te topas con una tetona de 18 añitos por la calle, le propones follar a cambio de dinero y la muy cochina termina aceptando... https://t.co/ExWEg8xK38 https://t.co/h55szsSpE2

    26193015K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.9x their median

    Tetorras enormes y naturales, un coño que es pura mantequilla, un cuerpo escultural, carita de no haber roto un plato, modosita, educada, timidilla... https://t.co/LPQz8DjwXg https://t.co/fPqyk0OUGM

    18392117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    Mariana Sapp es una joven estudiante española con unos encantos impresionante. https://t.co/wsYRCrabfd https://t.co/OAC5ebcKJC

    14070013K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 100 interactions against 391K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.813% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 92% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 175x its own typical post.

What is PutaLocura's engagement rate on X?
PutaLocura (@PutaLocuraXXX) has an engagement rate of 0.026%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 390,797 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.026%, PutaLocura sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PutaLocuraXXX have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PutaLocuraXXX post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going