Back to @Puppy_Niemamadi's profile

. engagement report

@Puppy_Niemamadi - 162K followers on X

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.024%
of 162K followers
Per impression
0.138%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
17.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
32
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 162K followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.138% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.9K interactions, about 183x its own typical post.

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

.'s engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 8% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.024%, . sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video2% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 2% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 38 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 29, 2026183x their median

    dije que no pararía hasta ser chrollo https://t.co/HFF9e96Yez

    5.7K1265015211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.5x their median

    免费抽五个人入门,条件是m腿蹲边撸几把边吐舌翻白眼比耶拍给我

    87024139K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20263.1x their median

    22岁性冷淡了我算是完了,前主你可以再回来把我调成每天只会发情的性奴木勾吗😭😭😭😭

    8909019K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.9x their median

    带我过完逐星者计划给他内射一次

    78016041K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.0x their median

    有人懂在想拉屎的时候刷到操屁眼的视频吗,我感觉我的屎被硬生生怼回去了………………

    5815028K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20261.8x their median

    想要爱

    5006027K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20261.7x their median

    给小狗投毒的人不得好死,彪哥晚安😭

    4915026K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20261.7x their median

    无聊到安静的躺在床上把一个小时的日本av完整的看完了……

    4508019K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    突然发现之前去泡汤的地方居然有网吧,我立马把刚点的外卖米线退了,询问了客服上网收费标准是30块钱一小时后我又打开美团点了“再来一单”

    4105013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    能复合吗,我不知道你厂里发的月饼是冰皮的

    3906025K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 162K followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.138% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.9K interactions, about 183x its own typical post.

What is .'s engagement rate on X?
. (@Puppy_Niemamadi) has an engagement rate of 0.024%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 162,082 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.024%, . sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Puppy_Niemamadi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Puppy_Niemamadi post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going