Proton engagement report
@ProtonPrivacy - 377K followers on X
Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 734 interactions against 377K followers, an engagement rate of 0.197%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 2.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 126K interactions, about 172x its own typical post.
Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Proton's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.197%, Proton sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 62% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 10% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 62% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 206 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 30, 2026172x their median
now apple…. why the hell would "mfhgv4-qqytrz-fr2qwf" be a good password????
- Aug 19, 2026117x their median
Why does "every app" need access to my location, my contacts, my photos, and my microphone just to function? You're a flashlight app. Why do you need to know where I live? This is a shakedown with permissions.
- Sep 6, 202672x their median
genuine question Chrome is free Gmail is free Maps is free Search is free Android is free Google made $400 billion last year am I missing something
- Aug 31, 202665x their median
TikTok has updated their profile display format. https://t.co/mEtp0pAz7S
- Oct 1, 202648x their median
https://t.co/vfVmZLh30r
- Aug 17, 202645x their median
Assim gente...não usem VPN pra stremar no discord Não usem VPN VPN é ruim Não se deve usar VPN Principalmente PROTONVPN que é grátis Não usem Muito errado
- Aug 23, 202643x their median
vpn https://t.co/18EP2yTpfm
- Sep 21, 202621x their median
I hope this email punches you in the face actually
- Oct 1, 202620x their median
PewDiePie trying to distill Sol and getting banned by OpenAI twice is the perfect side quest lmao… > “these tech giants worked hard stealing all of our data to make their AI machines” > “how dare we as consumers take part of their hard work stolen from us?” > uses Sol to generate his training seed data anyway > OpenAI bans him > appeals > gets unbanned > runs Sol again > gets banned again
- Sep 8, 202616x their median
>be me >mathematician >trying to solve one of the hardest problems in the field, million dollar prize on it >grind it for a year >every draft, idea, and dead-end goes into a hosted AI coding tool >paying for it out of my own research funds >bill is enormous >August 2026, finally crack it >rumour starts going round that someone solved a major open problem >rumour is about me >days later the AI company hosting all my drafts tells me its internal model has produced a 100 page proof >it solved the same problem >it took the same route >a route nobody else on earth was working on >suspicious.mp3 >ask whether my sessions were used for training >"the model does not look up user data" >huh? >ask again >silence >mfw should've used Lumo
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 734 interactions against 377K followers, an engagement rate of 0.197%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 2.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 126K interactions, about 172x its own typical post.
- What is Proton's engagement rate on X?
- Proton (@ProtonPrivacy) has an engagement rate of 0.197%, based on the median interactions across 21 original posts from the last 30 days against 376,518 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.197%, Proton sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ProtonPrivacy have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ProtonPrivacy post?
- Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.57 posts per day across the measured window.