Back to @ProtonPrivacy's profile

Proton engagement report

@ProtonPrivacy - 372K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.14%
of 372K followers
Per impression
1.28%
41K views on a typical post
Reach
10.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
520
interactions (median)
Saved
0.142%
58 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.63/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 520 interactions against 372K followers, an engagement rate of 0.14%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 1.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 126K interactions, about 243x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Proton's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.14%, Proton sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link22% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 176 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 30, 2026243x their median

    now apple…. why the hell would "mfhgv4-qqytrz-fr2qwf" be a good password????

    119K7.2K2341813.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026165x their median

    Why does "every app" need access to my location, my contacts, my photos, and my microphone just to function? You're a flashlight app. Why do you need to know where I live? This is a shakedown with permissions.

    78K7.7K10771610K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202663x their median

    Assim gente...não usem VPN pra stremar no discord Não usem VPN VPN é ruim Não se deve usar VPN Principalmente PROTONVPN que é grátis Não usem Muito errado

    31K1.8K332761.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202661x their median

    vpn https://t.co/18EP2yTpfm

    31K1.1K517564K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202614x their median

    DON'T LET CHATGPT READ YOUR TEXT MESSAGES DON'T LET CHATGPT READ YOUR TEXT MESSAGES DON'T LET CHATGPT READ YOUR TEXT MESSAGES DON'T LET CHATGPT READ YOUR TEXT MESSAGES DON'T LET CHATGPT READ YOUR TEXT MESSAGES DON'T LET CHATGPT READ YOUR TEXT MESSAGES

    6.4K65821664625K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.4x their median

    The handcrafted magic behind Apple's new Mac mini introduction https://t.co/hIF30E70Rg

    1.6K1171961604K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.3x their median

    We're investigating an issue affecting access to our services. Your data is safe and nothing has been lost. Our engineering team is working on a fix. Follow https://t.co/bQXBLIwzuO for live updates. We apologize for disrupting your day and we're grateful for your patience.

    1.5K105652689K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.5x their median

    By default, ChatGPT keeps your chat history forever, uses it to train its models, and lets human reviewers read it. We read OpenAI's privacy policy so you don't have to. Here's what ChatGPT is allowed to do with everything you type into it 👇🧵 1/ https://t.co/ABJ3jKdn37

    1.1K160321574K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.2x their median

    Shut down the spying factories. https://t.co/jfQKeIni2a

    1.0K7015019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    As robotaxis spread, so does a surveillance network nobody voted to install. https://t.co/P1gZCPqzIR

    45374191031K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 520 interactions against 372K followers, an engagement rate of 0.14%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 1.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 126K interactions, about 243x its own typical post.

What is Proton's engagement rate on X?
Proton (@ProtonPrivacy) has an engagement rate of 0.14%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 371,834 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.14%, Proton sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ProtonPrivacy have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ProtonPrivacy post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going