Back to @ProspectAteolog's profile

Ateology engagement report

@ProspectAteolog - 125K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.15%
of 125K followers
Per impression
2.28%
8.3K views on a typical post
Reach
6.60%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
188
interactions (median)
Saved
0.194%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 188 interactions against 125K followers, an engagement rate of 0.15%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 2.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.0K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ateology's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.15%, Ateology sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 328 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 202632x their median

    🔊 Azerbaycan okullarda türbanı yasakladı ‼️ Türkiye’de de uygulanmasını isteyenler burada mı? 👇 https://t.co/hwfeUDF0S2

    5.2K3373413886K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202616x their median

    Ahlak için illa semavi bir dine mi ihtiyaç var? Hiçbirine inanmayan Japonlar, size küçük bir ders bırakmış. 👇🇯🇵 https://t.co/KYWgPeu8Tr

    2.5K3051451389K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202613x their median

    Bir Kızılderili kadın, kendisine İncil uzatan işgalcilere şöyle demiş: “Kitabınızı doğaya bırakın; rüzgâr sayfalarını dağıtacak, yağmur yazılarını silecek ve sonunda yok olup gidecek. Bizim kutsal kitabımız ise doğanın kendisidir.” Bazıları doğayı okumayı bırakıp kitapları kutsallaştırmayı seçti.

    2.0K304281637K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202610x their median

    “Bir kadın, kocası seks yapmak istediğinde, yarım saat sonra uçağı bile kalkıyor olsa, kocasının isteğini yerine getirip sevişmek zorundadır. ‘Yok, yorgunum; yok, başım ağrıyor.’ diye sekse yanaşmazsa, melekler sabaha kadar ona lanet okur.” — Bir İslam alimi https://t.co/fhIeucpKZ1

    702991.1K105408K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20264.6x their median

    “Dünyanın neresinde din egemen olmuşsa, orada ahlaksızlık tavana vurmuştur.” Prof. Dr. Celal Şengör’ün bu görüşü hakkında siz ne düşünüyorsunuz? 🤔 https://t.co/jRcwlqSDnI

    718559378.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.6x their median

    “Dünyada bekar veya bakire olarak ölen kadınların ahiretteki durumu ne olacak?” diye soruluyor. Cübbeli’nin cevabı: Şehitlere, yüksek makamlı zatlara “ikram” edilecekler… Bekar ve bakire kadınlar için kurulan ahiret tasvirine bakın. Kadın yine kendi başına bir birey değil; birilerine sunulacak “ikram” olarak görülüyor.

    349572601829K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.5x their median

    Prof. Yasin Ceylan’a sormuşlar: “Gençler arasında deizmin yaygınlaşmasını neye bağlıyorsunuz?” Prof. Yasin Ceylan şöyle yanıt vermiş: “Bunu Sami dinlerinin kısıtlayıcılığına, insan zihnini belli kalıplara sokmasına bağlıyorum. İnanç devri kapandı. İnsanlar artık bilgiyle hareket etmek istiyorlar. İnancın yerini bilgi ve sorgulama aldı. ‘Hayır ve şer, hepsini Tanrı yaratmış’ diyorlar. Birçok rasyonel insan, ‘Peki, şerri niye yaratmış olsun? Bu kötülüklerin gerisinde niye Tanrı olsun?’ diye soruşturuyor ve sonunda semavi dinlerdeki Tanrı’ya karşı sempatisini yitiriyor. Hristiyanlıkta da İslam’da da böyle oldu. İnsanlar, rasyonelliğin daha güçlü olması sebebiyle Sami dinlerindeki Tanrı’dan uzaklaşıyorlar.”

    53762551041K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.5x their median

    “İslam tarihinde hep savaşlar olmuştur. Hristiyanlar ve yahudilerden daha çok Müslümanlar birbiriyle savaşmıştır. Buradaki sorun medeniyet sorunudur. Bilim yok, teknoloji yok, üretim yok tarih boyunca tek gelir kaynakları savaş, işgal, ganimet, yağma..” — Hasan Mezarcı https://t.co/0Q1kmqUxTS

    5149639516K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.2x their median

    Cami içinde elinde silahla bir imam: “Allah’a ibadet etmenin, kâfiri öld*rmekten daha iyi bir yolu yoktur.” Burada ibadet mi anlatılıyor, cihat mı? https://t.co/31twRzkaeL

    273742202841K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20263.1x their median

    “Ben doğmadan kaderimi yazan Tanrı, ben öldükten sonra neden hesap soruyor?” — Stephen Hawking https://t.co/ftAarL1Fiz

    4244897814K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 188 interactions against 125K followers, an engagement rate of 0.15%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 2.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.0K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

What is Ateology's engagement rate on X?
Ateology (@ProspectAteolog) has an engagement rate of 0.15%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 125,363 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.15%, Ateology sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ProspectAteolog have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ProspectAteolog post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going