Back to @PrometheanActn's profile

Promethean Action engagement report

@PrometheanActn - 474K followers on X

Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.923%
of 474K followers
Per impression
6.47%
66K views on a typical post
Reach
14.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.338%
224 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.43/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 4.3K interactions against 474K followers, an engagement rate of 0.923%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 6.47% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 61% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 9.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #geopolitics, #uspolitics, #economy.

Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #geopolitics, #uspolitics, #economy.

Compared with accounts its own size

Promethean Action's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.923%, Promethean Action sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video61% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link42% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 61% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 42% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 229 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 20269.1x their median

    Carney walked out of U.S. trade talks at one minute to midnight and called it a war. It isn’t about tariffs. It’s a midterm operation, and Scott Bessent is fighting the war Carney doesn’t want you to notice. https://t.co/hq4mviEV0D

    28K9.7K7527921.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20265.9x their median

    They taught you snow is black. Trump didn’t ban the press for sport. He hit a propaganda machine Bertrand Russell wrote the manual for — mass psychology so you never ask where your convictions came from. $6 diesel isn’t “Trump broke it.” It’s thirty years of zero-growth policy. Why Trump Banned the Press (They Taught You Snow is Black):

    18K6.9K291372512K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20264.8x their median

    President Donald J. Trump delivers a message on National Purple Heart Day. 💜 "We express our tremendous gratitude to every American warrior & veteran who has received the Purple Heart… We say God bless them, God bless our military, & God bless the United States of America." https://t.co/vdiVpjX5Zp

    16K3.3K1.4K209489K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20264.7x their median

    Scott Bessent just named the British Virgin Islands on worldwide TV. @sjkokinda: the real target isn’t Iran. It’s the offshore money machine — BVI to Hong Kong. https://t.co/ckdS5rxkEl

    15K5.0K235253385K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20264.1x their median

    The biggest money behind Mamdani's super PAC — and nearly $2M behind El-Sayed's — traces to alumni of ONE Silicon Valley company. Chinese state-backed buyout. CCP-tied shareholder. This isn't grassroots. @BarbaraMBoyd follows the money: Get our free newsletter at https://t.co/efcAbgzGFa

    12K5.0K177157335K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.9x their median

    They will blow up the world to save their system. Russia just named Britain a combatant. Carney’s building a permanent-warfare bank. Freeland admits the plan: psychological operations against Americans before the midterms. @BarbaraMBoyd Midweek Update: https://t.co/wDQEJjelj3

    11K5.0K220300367K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.8x their median

    Trump just told you how the midterms are really being fought: not with campaign ads, but with diesel prices, a trade war and an AI panic — all timed for November. @sjkokinda follows the AI-ban paper trail. It doesn't lead to Silicon Valley. It leads to London. https://t.co/aT0kgfOmR0

    11K4.7K250263203K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.6x their median

    The AI 'panic' is a coordinated political play. From a researcher's viral post to CEO warnings and legislative proposals, it's all happening incredibly fast. Is it about genuine threat, or control? #AI #Politics #Tech https://t.co/j0uqAjYO2i

    10K4.6K324254218K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.6x their median

    They're screaming about $40 trillion in debt and a "bond market explosion." Right on schedule, ahead of the midterms. But Scott Bessent has a plan Wall Street and London literally cannot understand — because their models have no box for an economy that outgrows its debt. https://t.co/fM9KQd7fGo

    11K3.9K195161372K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20263.5x their median

    They thought the "traumatized sailors" story would sink Trump. Instead it exposed the whole psyop playbook — Tavistock, RAND swarming, NATO cognitive warfare. @BarbaraMBoyd breaks down London's fatal mistake. https://t.co/S5iHrbSpsy

    11K4.1K101122206K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#geopolitics#uspolitics#economy#politics#ai

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.3K interactions against 474K followers, an engagement rate of 0.923%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 6.47% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 61% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 9.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #geopolitics, #uspolitics, #economy.

What is Promethean Action's engagement rate on X?
Promethean Action (@PrometheanActn) has an engagement rate of 0.923%, based on the median interactions across 72 original posts from the last 30 days against 474,440 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.923%, Promethean Action sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PrometheanActn have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PrometheanActn post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going