Robert A. Pape engagement report
@ProfessorPape - 176K followers on X
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 220 interactions against 176K followers, an engagement rate of 0.125%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video, 18% are part of a thread and 74% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #protectourdemocracy, #votingrights.
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026. Recurring tags: #protectourdemocracy, #votingrights.
Compared with accounts its own size
Robert A. Pape's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.125%, Robert A. Pape sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 41% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 74% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 41% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 74% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 252 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 2, 202617x their median
5 times Trump threatened to obliterate Iran in days, only to TACO: • March: 48hr deadline extended • April: "Stone Age" threat ➔ ceasefire • June: Called off strike hrs before • July: Held off on "probable" deal • Today (Aug 2): "Locked & loaded" ➔ halts attacks day later https://t.co/5RFnJnylzd
- Aug 31, 202612x their median
Trump announced full US control of Venezuela’s oil, that will fill up the dwindling reserves Only 2 problems The oil is years away at best US troops would need to protect the civilian contractors or else they won’t go Don’t count on lower gas prices soon https://t.co/zyZA8pTfIn
- Aug 10, 20269.8x their median
HAS IRAN DETERRED TRUMP? Since the U.S. last struck Iran on July 30, Trump has threatened, delayed, deflected—and now says he is “low-keying it.” That is not just rhetoric. Deterrence has a precise meaning: you change an adversary’s behavior by making retaliation too costly.
- Aug 20, 20267.6x their median
A year ago, while the U.S. was bombing Fordow, I spent two weeks inside China touring its advanced industries—from AI and robotics to lasers and electric vehicles. I came away convinced that Americans are seeing perhaps 10% of what is actually happening in China.
- Aug 2, 20267.1x their median
Trump's pattern of strategic defeat is only leading to more escalation, a world economic crisis, and more gains for Iran https://t.co/kJ5pBhDjc8
- Oct 1, 20266.8x their median
As an expert who analyzed 8,000+ suicide terror attacks, this wasn't a standard "suicide attempt" on Flydubai FZ1073 The critical clue? The 14,000-ft nose dive happened just 30 min from Tel Aviv. Suicide is private; weaponizing a cockpit near a target is a calculated strike https://t.co/9QodenHCmI
- Sep 7, 20266.5x their median
Everyone should see President Trump’s vision Explains so much of why no countries are rallying to Bessent’s call for global sanctions on Iran America needs allies, not colonies https://t.co/Fjk74UrEKn
- Aug 17, 20266.2x their median
Last time US reduced its military commitment to South Korea was in 1970s in aftermath of Vietnam Seoul began Project 890, a covert nuclear weapons program - ended only when US reversed course The Iran war is touching off a proliferation chain reaction (Saudi). SK may be next https://t.co/1WYX2EQrF3
- Sep 11, 20265.9x their median
BREAKING ANALYSIS: The Red Sea Back Door Slams Shut The fall of Mocha and Perim Island shuts the global economy’s last emergency energy escape valve The widening Escalation Trap will impact all of us Read how and for how long: https://t.co/lqsqwW0xXg
- Sep 1, 20265.5x their median
US bombing Iran for second day this week 1st US strike led to Gulf-Wide Iranian retaliation Expect a greater Iranian response this time Iran has US in the Escalation Trap and a no win scenario https://t.co/b5azNh4Xdt
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 220 interactions against 176K followers, an engagement rate of 0.125%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video, 18% are part of a thread and 74% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #protectourdemocracy, #votingrights.
- What is Robert A. Pape's engagement rate on X?
- Robert A. Pape (@ProfessorPape) has an engagement rate of 0.125%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 176,110 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.125%, Robert A. Pape sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ProfessorPape have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ProfessorPape post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.