Back to @PriceErrorsUS's profile

Price Errors engagement report

@PriceErrorsUS - 325K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 325K followers
Per impression
0.025%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
8.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
7
interactions (median)
Saved
0.007%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 325K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.025% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 7% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27 interactions, about 3.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Price Errors's engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 2% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Price Errors sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,596 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,062 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video7% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 7% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 72 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 21, 20263.9x their median

    $250 OUTDOOR STORAGE BOX $11 ON LOWE'S https://t.co/OCOqNTo92m

    11015123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.4x their median

    $2000 DELL 5K2K MONITOR FOR $167 ON AMAZON https://t.co/eeOqwqA2F0

    11112035K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20263.0x their median

    🚨 PRICE ERROR Samsung 4TB 990 EVO Plus SSD $315 (List: $1050) 4TB for less than 2TB on Amazon https://t.co/fDfHoAfTUx

    1704032K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.4x their median

    $325 PS5 CONSOLE ON AMAZON Sold by Amazon Resale - Like New https://t.co/EDZNOZV4yz

    1502031K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.4x their median

    $1500 OFF SAMSUNG 65" OLED ON AMAZON https://t.co/JRws7MvS3U

    1223031K viewsView on X
  • Jun 1, 20262.1x their median

    $1000 OFF ABS GAMING PC Specs: RTX 5070 Ti, Ryzen 7 9800X3D, 32GB DDR5, 2TB SSD Lowest ever from Walmart! https://t.co/f2D3uNetsw

    1403011K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 20262.3x their median

    FREE 6 MONTHS OF AMAZON PRIME https://t.co/sZBNhm8hjy https://t.co/cxX3p4e4Bx

    1411012K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 20261.9x their median

    $25 VACUUM ON AMAZON (LIST: $160) Code: RM4YP9MZ https://t.co/4LEOXZCRaP

    616037K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 20261.9x their median

    $7 MEN'S CHELSEA BOOTS ON WALMART https://t.co/LdWsPE09W2

    101208.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20261.7x their median

    $700+ OFF APPLE MACBOOK BRO Like New on Amazon https://t.co/9ft5PCoPcT

    822028K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 325K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.025% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 7% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27 interactions, about 3.9x its own typical post.

What is Price Errors's engagement rate on X?
Price Errors (@PriceErrorsUS) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 324,684 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Price Errors sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PriceErrorsUS have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PriceErrorsUS post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going