Back to @PrezLives2022's profile

Prez engagement report

@PrezLives2022 - 141K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.156%
of 141K followers
Per impression
7.08%
3.1K views on a typical post
Reach
2.21%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
221
interactions (median)
Saved
0.064%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 221 interactions against 141K followers, an engagement rate of 0.156%. Posts are seen about 3.1K times each, and 7.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 58K interactions, about 260x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #demsunited, #breaking, #la06. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #demsunited, #breaking, #la06.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.156%, Prez sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,805 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,448 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video14% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 14% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 637 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 7, 2026260x their median

    So Ivanka claims she came across this island swimming in the Mediterranean and she came ashore barefoot to explore the islands😂😂 Here is the problem with this: First, the island is in the Adriatic Sea. Secondly, the Albanians say the island is full of snakes making her barefoot story implausible. Lastly, in the words of Steve Schmidt, the island is full of landmines thus making her extremely lucky or a liar. I’m going with liar.

    48K8.2K7981961.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20252.7x their median

    Apollo is the Antichrist and Anubis is the False Prophet? 770: The Devil Runs The Finders Club #antichrist #apollo #fallenangel https://t.co/ePK8ehSmHY

    440109321030K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20261.8x their median

    He Wanted the Cameras. He Lost the Coverage. There is something almost too perfect about what happened when Chinese President Xi Jinping came to the White House. Donald Trump has spent years attacking news organizations that report things he doesn't like. Then his administration banned CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House. A federal judge ordered their access restored. But when Xi arrived, CNN and MS NOW were still being denied access to cover the welcome ceremony. And because CNN had been removed from the White House television pool, the other major networks declined to provide the shared camera coverage. The result? One of the biggest diplomatic events of Trump's presidency was missing the usual live television coverage. And then Trump got angry. He accused CNN and MS NOW of refusing to cover Xi's arrival because they didn't want to give Trump credit. He called the event magnificent and said it was “made for television.” You really couldn't make this up. Trump's administration shuts out the press. The networks push back. The cameras aren't there for the spectacle and Trump blames the media for the very coverage his own actions helped prevent. That's the irony. You can't spend years attacking journalists, threatening their access and trying to dictate who gets to cover you, and then act shocked when your decisions have consequences. The Xi visit had everything Trump loves: the red carpet, the military ceremony, the formal welcome, the international attention. It was a made-for-television moment, but the television pool wasn't operating normally because the administration had excluded one of its members. And the White House continued blocking CNN and MS NOW reporters even after a judge ordered access restored. Trump wanted the cameras. But he wanted them on his terms. He wanted the audience, the spectacle, and the images of a president commanding the world stage. When the coverage didn't happen as expected, he turned around and blamed the press. You can't demand the spotlight while trying to control who is allowed to hold the camera. A president can grant credentials, criticize reporters, and complain about coverage he doesn't like, but the press is not the president's public-relations department, and the cameras do not exist to feed his ego. The irony became even clearer on Friday, when the television pool resumed coverage after CNN's access was restored. The cameras came back. The story moved on. But the lesson remains. If you punish the press for doing its job, don't act surprised when the consequences interfere with your own show. Trump wanted the cameras. He wanted the audience. He wanted the spectacle. What he apparently forgot is that the cameras don't belong to him.

    2651081633.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20261.7x their median

    Look what just came in the mail! I’m about to vote so fucking hard! https://t.co/QdigJETFJa

    324322623.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    Israel is following the same script that America followed in their genocide and displacement of Native Americans. This is why we fund them and turn a blind eye. It was the nations elite then and it’s the nations elite now. Israel and America are different feathers of the same bird.

    193731303.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    Trump is considering destroying a national park by building a baseball stadium on it. Trump administration is considering constructing a baseball stadium in Grand Teton National Park, one of the country’s most-visited national parks that sits in the Rocky Mountains in northwest Wyoming. There are very few people in Wyoming, so what purpose would this serve? The park already has annual receipts of 1 billion due to 50 million visitors per year. If they were counting on earning revenue for public benefit, they could simply buy some private land, construct, a stadium, and sell tickets. Wyoming can’t support a pro baseball team. Maybe a minor league team, or a game or two with the Savannah Bananas. Perhaps even some college World Series games, but otherwise this makes no sense. Just rich people destroying the beauty of Americas treasure.?

    121821531.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    If Israel is going out of their way to develop deep ties with Ukraine, then it may be time to side with Russia in the war.

    35106833.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    In India a drunk man was bitten 3 times by a cobra. He killed the cobra and walked around with it for an hour stating “how dare it bite me.” Finally after an hour he needed the warnings to get to a medical facility where he was treated with anti venom and then released. That dude is crazy, but might be a fun guy to have a drink or two with😂😂😂

    708603.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    https://t.co/018eY34JQR

    137412.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#demsunited#breaking#la06#trumpcorruptcongress

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 221 interactions against 141K followers, an engagement rate of 0.156%. Posts are seen about 3.1K times each, and 7.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 58K interactions, about 260x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #demsunited, #breaking, #la06. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Prez's engagement rate on X?
Prez (@PrezLives2022) has an engagement rate of 0.156%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 140,777 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.156%, Prez sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PrezLives2022 have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @PrezLives2022 post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going