Back to @Poynter's profile

Poynter engagement report

@Poynter - 199K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 199K followers
Per impression
0.321%
2.2K views on a typical post
Reach
1.10%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
7
interactions (median)
Saved
0.046%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 199K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.2K times each, and 0.321% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 326 interactions, about 47x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026. Recurring tag: #media.

Compared with accounts its own size

Poynter's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Poynter sits below the 10th percentile of the 206,310 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 206,310 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,260 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video3% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 3% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 392 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 202647x their median

    The Associated Press plans to lay off 20 video production staff in the U.S. today and move those jobs to a new production hub in India. The decision to eliminate journalists with decades of experience and move their jobs covering American news to India raises concerns about the quality of future coverage, union leaders said. Read this: https://t.co/1Z0bf24aTM

    166131111843K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202642x their median

    McClatchy, whose titles include The Miami Herald and The Sacramento Bee, executed its most severe layoffs in years on Thursday, cutting newsroom staff at some papers by upwards of 40%. https://t.co/eugDaODcvB

    122145121653K viewsView on X
  • Nov 4, 202235x their median

    Poynter is a nonprofit media institute and newsroom that provides fact-checking, media literacy and journalism ethics training to citizens and journalists in service to democracy. https://t.co/cyh3UM0ctY

    119288910View on X
  • Aug 26, 202616x their median

    For journalism to survive, “the journalism itself must become indispensable to people. To make that shift, journalists must make the public the focus of their work, not a bystander to it,” writes journalism professor Tom Rosenstiel. For Poynter, Rosenstiel makes the case for why (and how) the news industry must shift from a “Journalism of Attention to a Journalism of Value.” https://t.co/S6v50yUu1a

    6538154.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202612x their median

    Months after billionaire David Hoffmann came to Lee Enterprises bearing a message of renewed investment in the chain, the company began laying off editors and copy editors at papers across the country. While the scale of the recent layoffs appears to be much smaller than past rounds of mass cuts, they still raise questions: https://t.co/mJBV58EfMt

    3843047.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.3x their median

    For decades, Stars and Stripes has been a vital part of the journalistic ecosystem covering the U.S. military, specifically serving the 1.3 million active-duty troops, their families and millions more retired service members. That credibility and editorial independence are in jeopardy, write Poynter’s Jon Greenberg and Kelly McBride, following the recent firings of publisher Max Lederer and editor-in-chief Erik Slavin. Critical journalism that documents the conditions service members endure, exposes broken systems and holds the generals and the administration accountable ultimately makes the U.S. military stronger. https://t.co/Fwm9hUmQWU

    2615305.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20266.1x their median

    More than 90 journalists across the country were laid off by McClatchy on Thursday, with some newsroom staffs cut by upwards of 40%. The cuts included reporters, photographers and videographers and affected coverage ranging from government and education to accountability to sports. At least 13 papers across eight states lost staff. The layoffs are part of a companywide restructuring, according to a notice from McClatchy. https://t.co/7AMiwhLK8n

    2219025.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20265.3x their median

    On Sept. 18, 1851, The New York Times published for the first time. 175 years later, it’s marking the milestone by revisiting nearly two centuries of triumphs, mistakes and change. https://t.co/gN0oVJuVSm

    268303.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20264.3x their median

    Early Thursday morning, U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly ruled that President Trump’s ban of CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House was likely unconstitutional. He ordered the White House to “immediately return, reinstate, and restore” their press credentials. “It’s a major setback to Trump and a reaffirming victory for the free press — at least in the short term,” writes senior media writer Tom Jones. Read this #media story and more in today’s Poynter Report: https://t.co/bcgfKFwa33

    207302.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.3x their median

    Multiple South Florida newsrooms are sounding the alarm over a new tactic for suppressing undesirable news stories: false copyright claims. Read this media story and more in today's Poynter Report newsletter: https://t.co/ced21wba5G

    1012102.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#media

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 199K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.2K times each, and 0.321% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 326 interactions, about 47x its own typical post.

What is Poynter's engagement rate on X?
Poynter (@Poynter) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 198,741 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Poynter sits below the 10th percentile of the 206,310 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Poynter have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Poynter post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going