Powerledger engagement report
@Powerledger_io - 92K followers on X
Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 0.926% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.4K interactions, about 291x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.024%, Powerledger sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 158.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 62K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 74K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 89K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 104K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 94K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 68K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 59K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 237K |
| Monday | 0% | 300K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 299K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 256K |
| Thursday | -1% | 249K |
| Friday | -3% | 258K |
| Saturday | +3% | 232K |
Best tweets
- May 16, 2026291x their median
Anthropic needs to solve the computer/power problem or they will be the Friendster of the AI era. I just ran a semi-complicated stock screening prompt on all four major AIs: Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT and Claude. The first three returned comparable results. Claude refused to do the work. Not the way to win guys…
- Jul 6, 202687x their median
Wind and solar combined generated 22% of global electricity, overtaking gas for the first time ever. Clean energy has officially become the world’s fastest-growing power source https://t.co/qxlFdPTyHy
- Jun 19, 202623x their median
Datacenter power requests have crossed a terawatt, nearly the size of the entire US grid. https://t.co/0GWJhqtCvP
- Jun 29, 20265.8x their median
After $80 billion in renewables investment, solar is the top power source in Spain. But these days, the grid can’t handle the glut on sunny days, and investors are bailing out https://t.co/I524v39yWQ
- Jun 20, 20265.5x their median
Global energy spending is on track to reach $3.4 trillion in 2026 Around $2.2 trillion of this is set to go to grids, storage, low-emissions fuels, nuclear, renewables, efficiency & electrification And about $1.2 trillion goes to oil, natural gas & coal: https://t.co/8IajZj1gIL https://t.co/ODvGsvloiQ
- May 12, 20264.6x their median
Growth in the world's energy use in 2025 was met by a diverse range of sources – led by solar PV, followed by natural gas Solar accounted for over 25% of global demand growth. This is the 1st time it has met a higher share of growth than any other source: https://t.co/5PnlcAmXjN https://t.co/YwspJne8IX
- May 10, 20262.2x their median
Energy is the foundation of compute and AI, and continued scaling will require significantly more reliable power infrastructure. Nuclear power will be central to meeting that demand. https://t.co/K3d6ZZvpAP
- Jun 7, 20261.9x their median
Jensen Huang has been consistent in saying that a lack of energy is the bottleneck to innovation. America needs reliable, 24/7 power, and nuclear energy is ready to meet that demand. https://t.co/iQDNvjaOt1
- May 21, 20261.5x their median
Happy 10th birthday, @Powerledger_io. https://t.co/r1CNBWR9rg
- Aug 6, 2026
Energy communities, not new transmission lines, are becoming the real resilience layer for the grid. The part that stalls most P2P energy trading pilots is proving the model without committing to infrastructure most teams can't justify yet. Our Transactive Lite is the fast path to that resilience layer. https://t.co/rUhDxxiXcA
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 0.926% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.4K interactions, about 291x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Powerledger's engagement rate on X?
- Powerledger (@Powerledger_io) has an engagement rate of 0.024%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 92,465 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.024%, Powerledger sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Powerledger_io have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @Powerledger_io post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.