Back to @PowerHasheur's profile

Hasheur engagement report

@PowerHasheur - 457K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.054%
of 457K followers
Per impression
0.428%
58K views on a typical post
Reach
12.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
247
interactions (median)
Saved
0.01%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.23/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 247 interactions against 457K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 58K times each, and 0.428% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.9K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026. Recurring tag: #bitcoin.

Compared with accounts its own size

Hasheur's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.054%, Hasheur sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,960 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,518 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%102K
16:00 UTC-3%99K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-2%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%233K
Monday0%292K
Tuesday-3%284K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%246K
Friday-3%255K
Saturday+3%229K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 9, 202636x their median

    BREAKING: The European Parliament just passed Chat Control 1.0 A proposal to stop the new law, which will allow big tech companies to voluntarily scan all private messages, needed an absolute majority of 361 voted but received only 314 votes. As it was the last day before summer recess, many MEPs had returned to their home countries and didn’t take part in the surprise vote. Chat Control 2.0 is still being prepared. That law will make it mandatory to scan people’s private messages.

    6.2K1.5K5436232.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 202634x their median

    JUST IN: 🇪🇺 Binance CEO Richard Teng says 70% of EU user withdrawals went to self-hosted wallets instead of MiCA-regulated platforms.

    7.3K577390151927K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 202629x their median

    UPDATE: A new CLARITY Act draft has been released, merging the Senate Banking and Agriculture Committee versions and adding an ethics provision for the first time. A motion to proceed is expected Monday or Tuesday, with a possible floor vote the week of August 3. https://t.co/A7FwNTg9Wk

    5.6K1.1K248167749K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 202627x their median

    BREAKING: June PPI Inflation falls to 5.5%, below expectations of 6.2%. Core PPI Inflation fell to 4.7%, below expectations of 5.2%. Month-over-month PPI inflation fell -0.3%, the biggest decline since April 2025. The odds of rate hikes are declining further.

    5.6K707233124751K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202619x their median

    🚨 Au lendemain de la confirmation du piratage de nos impôts (DGFiP), une nouvelle fuite est revendiquée : 2 041 778 propriétaires seraient concernés. Noms, dates de naissance, adresses, identifiants fonciers et parcelles cadastrales figurent dans les données. https://t.co/l62CWuk4TE

    2.7K1.6K198215905K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202612x their median

    BREAKING: 🇺🇸 U.S. Senate puts CLARITY Act on hold to prioritize Russia sanctions bill. The vote is now unlikely before next week, leaving only the FINAL days before the Senate’s August 8 recess. STOP THESE DELAYS! 🤬 https://t.co/2uvSQFGuAK

    2.3K40425169289K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20265.3x their median

    Pour la première fois depuis très longtemps, je commence à voir des balbutiements de « ça y est, le bottom est derrière nous » à droite à gauche Comme toujours: il n’y a pas de magie et personne n’a de réponse magique mais… Ça me donne envie de faire le point sur la question. Je vous fais une vidéo ? Vous en pensez quoi vous ?

    1.1K221561131K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20264.9x their median

    South Korea’s stock market is collapsing, down almost 11 PERCENT IN ONE DAY. When an entire country’s index depends on one sector, this is what happens. https://t.co/e4wii3QZSX

    1.0K927814305K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.8x their median

    BREAKING BIG: @Solana’s double disinflation proposal has passed after Yes votes climbed above the 66.67% threshold in the final hour of voting. The proposal will double disinflation to 30%, reducing projected $SOL issuance by 18.9M SOL ($1.47B) over six years. https://t.co/JCX3mtLyDX

    7231304451157K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.7x their median

    Je me réhabitue un peu trop vite à ce tableau vert quand même https://t.co/OMFGA9Ze8x

    8711829352K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bitcoin

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 247 interactions against 457K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 58K times each, and 0.428% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.9K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

What is Hasheur's engagement rate on X?
Hasheur (@PowerHasheur) has an engagement rate of 0.054%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 457,244 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.054%, Hasheur sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PowerHasheur have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PowerHasheur post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going