Back to @Potropegaso21's profile

RAULGTZ.® engagement report

@Potropegaso21 - 137K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.016%
of 137K followers
Per impression
0.641%
3.4K views on a typical post
Reach
2.45%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
22
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 137K followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.4K times each, and 0.641% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 50x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #naciónazul, #video.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #naciónazul, #video.

Compared with accounts its own size

RAULGTZ.®'s engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.016%, RAULGTZ.® sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video63% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 67 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 12, 202650x their median

    Han habido sinnúmero de fotos y videos del reciente eclipse, pero ninguno como el del 15 de febrero de 1961, en el que filmaron la película Barrabás.. Sigue siendo insuperable. https://t.co/XJ9YkHTqf4

    9551450225K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202644x their median

    Yo vacacionando…🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/SYtUe8AkEM

    8221510591K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202610x their median

    Súmate!! https://t.co/QN2tnddm8i

    21012024.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20267.4x their median

    𝗘𝗟 “𝗡𝗜Ñ𝗢 𝗩𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗟” 𝗗𝗘 𝗠É𝗫𝗜𝗖𝗢 𝗬𝗔 𝗗𝗘𝗕𝗨𝗧Ó 🇲🇽🔥 Durante años, el nombre de Alex Alcalá estuvo acompañado por una palabra: promesa. El mexicoamericano llamó la atención desde muy joven, pasó por la estructura del Manchester City e incluso tuvo la oportunidad de entrenar con el primer equipo bajo las órdenes de Pep Guardiola. Sin embargo, el salto que tanto esperaba al futbol de Primera División no terminaba de llegar. Hasta que finalmente llegó su momento. Con apenas 20 años, Alex Alcalá debutó profesionalmente con Querétaro ante LAFC en la Leagues Cup 2026, apareciendo como titular con los Gallos Blancos. ⚽ 𝗗𝗘 𝗦𝗘𝗥 𝗘𝗟 “𝗡𝗜Ñ𝗢 𝗩𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗟” 𝗤𝗨𝗘 𝗦𝗢𝗥𝗣𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗗Í𝗔 𝗣𝗢𝗥 𝗦𝗨 𝗧𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗢… 𝗔 𝗣𝗜𝗦𝗔𝗥 𝗣𝗢𝗥 𝗙𝗜𝗡 𝗨𝗡𝗔 𝗖𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗛𝗔 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗢 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗙𝗘𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗔𝗟.

    14497220K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20267.1x their median

    Cuando el ego te rebasa… https://t.co/939px6hUof

    145100217K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20265.1x their median

    No solo es el gol, es el juego que ha brindado… El gran Gil Mora… Fantástico.

    1094004.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20264.7x their median

    Ron Damon tirando factos… https://t.co/n80q2OT3CM

    8716017.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20263.7x their median

    Hoy en pausa !!.. Mañana le seguimos con el 🔴⚫️ o lo que quieran .. Se les quiere a todos hasta los haters .. jajaja .. pura opinión debatible .. a quien se le de pues .. Bye que ya empieza esto .. Haaaagala!! 🤘🏼 https://t.co/iq8NiPjk5r

    7407110.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.4x their median

    No te quedes fuera…! https://t.co/tx7lYUWB3V

    475002.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.3x their median

    Plebeyos….. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/l6eOvIrBiL

    438005.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#naciónazul#video

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 137K followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.4K times each, and 0.641% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 50x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #naciónazul, #video.

What is RAULGTZ.®'s engagement rate on X?
RAULGTZ.® (@Potropegaso21) has an engagement rate of 0.016%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 136,871 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.016%, RAULGTZ.® sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Potropegaso21 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Potropegaso21 post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going