Poros Halang ID engagement report
@PorosHalangID - 119K followers on X
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 579 interactions against 119K followers, an engagement rate of 0.487%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 2.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 53x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #poroshalangid, #mufc, #ucl.
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #poroshalangid, #mufc, #ucl.
Compared with accounts its own size
Poros Halang ID's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.487%, Poros Halang ID sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 76% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 76% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 113 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 5, 202653x their median
𝐈𝐍𝐃𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐒𝐈𝐀 🟰 𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘 𝐌𝐀𝐊𝐄𝐑𝐒 🇮🇩🏆 They've waited such a long time for a trophy... 1991 was their last official trophy. Now they've done it again, making their whole country proud by winning the first-ever FIFA ASEAN Cup. 🏆 What a moment for them and their whole country. 🥹🫶
- Sep 29, 202634x their median
🚨 𝗡𝗘𝗪: Acun Ilicali, Hull City's owner, is the first Premier League owner to speak publicly about Manchester City: "I don’t say they are guilty or not because they are saying they are innocent." "I think the Premier League says they are not innocent." "If they are not innocent and they did something." "I think (it is) not different than having doping and (winning) the Olympic medal." "This is financial doping at the end of the day. Bringing top four or five players with huge money, breaking the rules."
- Sep 30, 202626x their median
🚨🚨 NEW: Manchester United and Liverpool are working to INCREASE PRESSURE on the Premier League to impose a stronger punishment on Manchester City and pay compensation to affected clubs. [@BBCSport] #mufc https://t.co/mxrFsxZIPh
- Sep 28, 20266.1x their median
Honest thoughts on this man’s performance tonight? 👇 https://t.co/0nFvEHYoAl
- Sep 28, 20263.9x their median
Bersiap digoreng. 😅👀 https://t.co/GsQ4bTYnHa
- Oct 4, 20263.4x their median
YES JOSHHHHHH!!!!!! 2-1 ORANJE! 💥🔥 https://t.co/9M3hqauhpg
- Sep 29, 20262.3x their median
“Klub terkejut atas keputusan Premier League.” Kaya orang selingkuh, tapi kaget pas ketahuan dan akhirnya menjelma jadi korban. Tabiat pecundang. 🤝 #poroshalangid
- Oct 1, 20262.1x their median
Football. Bloody hell. https://t.co/9geM6ElX5L
- Oct 1, 20261.7x their median
Singapore sabun, wasit sabun, but this is GBK! 🥹🙌 https://t.co/WWpoFuNiMK
- Sep 29, 20261.7x their median
“Yang ngasih piala bukan duit, tapi pemain yang bagus.” Bro. 😂☠️
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 579 interactions against 119K followers, an engagement rate of 0.487%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 2.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 53x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #poroshalangid, #mufc, #ucl.
- What is Poros Halang ID's engagement rate on X?
- Poros Halang ID (@PorosHalangID) has an engagement rate of 0.487%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 118,654 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.487%, Poros Halang ID sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @PorosHalangID have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @PorosHalangID post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.