Popular Mechanics engagement report
@PopMech - 339K followers on X
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 339K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 0.126% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.704% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17 interactions, about 5.7x its own typical post.
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Popular Mechanics's engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 9% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Popular Mechanics sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 20% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 20% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 133 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 1, 20265.7x their median
Our Brains Connected to Another Dimension 50,000 Years Ago—And Turbocharged Our Intelligence, Radical New Theory Says https://t.co/RW7rmKq1Vk
- Sep 2, 20263.7x their median
Our Brains Connected to Another Dimension 50,000 Years Ago—And Turbocharged Our Intelligence, Radical New Theory Says https://t.co/gxz3iD9JA9
- Sep 1, 20263.7x their median
Half the World’s Population Will Be Nearsighted by 2050. Scientists Found a Life-Changing Fix. https://t.co/s3oRKVLbff
- Sep 2, 20263.3x their median
This “transducer” concept could explain consciousness, dreams, genius, and around 90 mysterious phenomena. Read the full story at the link below. 🔗: https://t.co/VgHxKJOTuM https://t.co/48WGyDYuGf
- Sep 1, 20263.3x their median
In the shadow of nuclear disaster, these canines show remarkable resilience to the deadly disease. Read the full story at the link below. 🔗: https://t.co/yIEx6fz0nQ https://t.co/pMSYtaPbDV
- Sep 2, 20263.0x their median
In A Tiny Flash 5,000 Feet Underground, Scientists May Have Finally Spotted Dark Matter https://t.co/zdd3KNkgk3
- Sep 2, 20263.0x their median
This Little Red Dot Might Be Hiding a Black Hole From the Beginning of Time https://t.co/nUrkQcLBIS
- Sep 2, 20263.0x their median
Scientists Just Built a Fridge 180 Times Colder than Deep Space—It Could Unlock the Quantum Era https://t.co/75axW0BXs8
- Sep 2, 20262.7x their median
A College Student Accidentally Broke the Laws of Thermodynamics https://t.co/QmFcR5Gpy0
- Sep 2, 20262.3x their median
Scientists Just Built a Fridge 180 Times Colder than Deep Space—It Could Unlock the Quantum Era https://t.co/MzHkVdvYig
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 339K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 0.126% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.704% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17 interactions, about 5.7x its own typical post.
- What is Popular Mechanics's engagement rate on X?
- Popular Mechanics (@PopMech) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 339,317 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Popular Mechanics sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @PopMech have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @PopMech post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.