Politics UK engagement report
@PolitlcsUK - 522K followers on X
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 3.0K interactions against 522K followers, an engagement rate of 0.573%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 286K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 54.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 62% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 8.8x its own typical post.
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Politics UK's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.573%, Politics UK sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,368 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.142% to 0.672%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.142% |
| 75th percentile | 0.672% |
| 90th percentile | 2.54% |
| 99th percentile | 82.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 46% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 46% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 208 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 19, 20268.8x their median
🚨 NEW: Andy Burnham has announced people on buses who vape, play loud music, litter or threaten others will face £100 fines from today
- Sep 8, 20266.3x their median
🚨 UPDATE: All London airports are now closed for arriving flights till at least 11pm due to the air traffic control outage
- Aug 21, 20265.3x their median
🚨 NEW: Andy Burnham is planning a bid for the UK to host the World Cup in 2038 or 2042 [@theipaper]
- Sep 3, 20264.9x their median
🚨 NEW: Reform UK and Nigel Farage have been caught potentially breaking electoral law - Verbatim ran a year-long undercover investigation, verified by Channel 4 News - Investigators posed as the British-based son of wealthy American donor, who was looking to give money to Reform UK - Because the donor was based in the US, he couldn't legally donate directly to the party - James Orr, Reform UK's Head of Policy, and Dan Jukes, a close aide to Nigel Farage, then allegedly helped arrange for a US company, which was actually set up by Verbatim, to pay for three polls commissioned by Reform UK - The three JL Partners polls cost £32,500 and were paid by Verbatim. Two were published in The Telegraph before the May elections - "Labour would face wipeout if elections went ahead" and "Two thirds of voters want Starmer out" - while The Times published "Reform vote in unions at same level as Labour" - Nigel Farage later met the undercover team in Clacton and praised the polling, saying "it worked, boom" and that it was "bang for buck" - The polls were presented as independent and the public was not told that Reform UK had commissioned them or a US company paid for them. The US company and supposed American donor were not legal donors under UK electoral law - Electoral Commission rules say political donations can include funding that helps a party cover costs and expenses, including research and studies, but the payments do not appear to have been declared to the Electoral Commission, despite reporting deadlines passing - Jukes allegedly later proposed a way to arrange a £500,000 donation from the US through the donor's UK-based son, who would appear to be the donor. The investigation says this arrangement would be illegal - At a Reform reception, Jukes allegedly introduced the undercover reporter as a "key donor for off the book project". The fake donor then allegedly met Suella Braverman, Sarah Pochin, Robert Jenrick and Danny Kruger - Legal expert and former Electoral Commission chief Bob Posner says the allegations should now be subject to a criminal investigation - The proposed £500,000 donation was never made - Reform UK, Farage, Jukes and James Orr did not comment but are understood to deny the allegations in full
- Sep 4, 20264.7x their median
🚨 UPDATE: West Midlands Police have denied Nigel Farage's claim that they refused to let him on stage due to a security threat
- Sep 3, 20264.5x their median
🚨 NEW: A company owned by Chelsea FC Chairman Todd Boehly made a £75,000 donation to Reform UK in May [@FT] https://t.co/fYUxIOb7V2
- Sep 13, 20264.4x their median
🚨 NEW: Andy Burnham completed the Great North Run half marathon in 01:57:34 https://t.co/3McKVdXvwk
- Sep 3, 20264.2x their median
🚨 NEW: The Lib Dems have reported Reform UK to the police over the alleged secret donations uncovered by Channel 4 and Verbatim https://t.co/GEUTwClbx1
- Aug 25, 20263.9x their median
🚨 NEW: Andy Burnham has announced Sainsbury's will offer 10,000 work placements from October to help tackle youth unemployment
- Sep 5, 20263.8x their median
🚨 NEW: Green Deputy Leader Mothin Ali has been revealed as a landlord despite the party’s pledge to abolish them [@thetimes] https://t.co/tE1F8gIhh8
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 3.0K interactions against 522K followers, an engagement rate of 0.573%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 286K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 54.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 62% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 8.8x its own typical post.
- What is Politics UK's engagement rate on X?
- Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) has an engagement rate of 0.573%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 522,155 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.573%, Politics UK sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,368 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @PolitlcsUK have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @PolitlcsUK post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.