The🐰FOO engagement report
@PolitiBunny - 216K followers on X
Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 105 interactions against 216K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 1.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 305x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #breaking, #neverforget.
Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #breaking, #neverforget.
Compared with accounts its own size
The🐰FOO's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.049%, The🐰FOO sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 81% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 16% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 81% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 327 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 12, 2026305x their median
Tucker Carlson backs Democrat Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan Senate race
- Sep 11, 2026107x their median
Today we honor the memories of those who were lost on 9/11 by doing what America's attackers and detractors could never do. By building. We build an America that is bigger. More inclusive. More empowering. More just. https://t.co/SokXM2IvYG
- Sep 12, 202685x their median
Blue states counted for 85% of duplicate registrations in 2024. https://t.co/jVzdKSzMrA
- May 8, 202627x their median
FOUR FUCKIN' THREE Let's go, Virginia! xo https://t.co/M5yasco3Pz
- Oct 3, 202613x their median
This is one of the reasons why trans people decide they don’t want to be here anymore. This is cruel and we should NOT be performing these surgeries. Humans are not experiments. Everything has a consequence. I feel sad for this person and angry at all that encouraged it. https://t.co/R0nIs8ofHo
- Sep 12, 20267.0x their median
Last night, I could hear a very loud chirping which sounded almost mechanical since it was so steady. And loud. I listened to the fridge. I listened to the dishwasher. Nope. Chirp chirp chirp. I asked the mister if he heard it, he thought it was on TV. He muted the TV. Chirp chirp chirp. Not the TV. He opened the back door to check outside and we heard it big time, CHIRP CHIRP CHIRP. I thought to myself, ok, cricket. Mr. FOO checked the back porch and found nothing - we were both worried that if there were a cricket or frog on the porch that the pups could get it and it would make them sick. Nothing. And the chirping stopped. Huh, ok. Fine. An hour later, I went to take the pups outside and I thought to myself, ‘Self, turn on the light and check one more time before taking them out.’ We hadn’t heard the chirping since he checked earlier so I felt like it was probably ok but JUUUUUST in case. I turned on the porch light and wandered out onto the back porch … and then I saw it. The biggest damn cricket I’ve ever seen. The MOTHER of all crickets. The FINAL BOSS cricket. I stopped. I know he looked at me. Pretty sure he grinned. Chirp. One chirp. Ok … I got this. I started to grab the back porch broom so I could gently sweep him into the yard but then HE JUMPED AT ME. I screamed. Loudly. He jumped AGAIN. I screamed … AGAIN. Dogs started barking like maniacs because they had been watching me from inside. I rushed in and shut the door. I locked the door because you know the cricket might be able to open it otherwise. The mister got up and looked outside, saw the cricket, and bravely went out to deal with it. ‘Don’t kill him,’ I said. He looked at me like I was crazy BUT grabbed the same broom and gently scooted the cricket toward the door. Now, the mister was an athlete many years ago and he’s very coordinated and quick, even now. So when the cricket chirped and jumped he was able to anticipate it… he also didn’t scream like me. The cricket glanced at me before he went out the door, making sure I knew this wasn’t over. I swear he did. Finally, the cricket was in the grass. MY HERO. Chirp chirp chirp.
- Sep 10, 20266.2x their median
The only conceivable reason for ICE to be at polling places is to spread the same fear and intimidation we’ve already seen in our communities. Every eligible American should be able to cast their ballot freely and safely. We’ll keep fighting tooth and nail to protect that sacred right. https://t.co/NNCcjCvEW0
- Oct 2, 20263.1x their median
Virginia Democrats want to change our VA Constitution to allow: ❌dismembering full term babies for any reason ❌protections for human sex traffickers ❌secret abortions at school ❌murderers to vote ❌violation of religious liberty Evil isn’t hiding anymore. 🗳️Vote NO
- Oct 2, 20263.1x their median
At the state fair, I met so many students with bright futures ahead of them. One young girl asked me for advice. Here's what I said to her: follow what excites you and challenge yourself along the way. https://t.co/3emrTMOE1B
- Oct 3, 20262.5x their median
Because of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Afghans who risked their lives serving beside US forces were cut off of Medicaid on October 1st. Cutting Medicaid coverage for Afghan SIVs as well as refugees and asylum seekers, including victims of human trafficking is just one of the ways President Trump and everyone who voted for this bill created “savings” enough to pass massive tax cuts. As of January 1st, it will be US citizens who start losing their Medicaid unless they meet a myriad of new administrative, paperwork requirements. That’s right — Trump and everyone who voted for this bill also funded tax cuts by adding extensive paperwork requirements, assuming cost savings as eligible people lose their coverage. The federal/state cost share of SNAP food programs just changed as well — decreasing the federal share of the program by a quarter, pushing those costs to states. Yet another means of creating ‘cost savings’ — creating food insecurity for families and putting even more kids at risk of going hungry. My administration is working to protect people as much as we can — funding the SNAP cost share change and working tirelessly to provide supports through an intentionally-difficult administrative process created by Trump and those who voted for this bill to cause coverage loss. But even with that work, we cannot undo all of the harms of this bill — those already implemented and those starting in the coming months — like the fact that this bill has summarily eliminated Afghan Special Immigrant Visa recipients, refugees, and asylum seekers from Medicaid. https://t.co/MhrJgUkdAk
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 105 interactions against 216K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 1.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 305x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #breaking, #neverforget.
- What is The🐰FOO's engagement rate on X?
- The🐰FOO (@PolitiBunny) has an engagement rate of 0.049%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 216,433 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.049%, The🐰FOO sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @PolitiBunny have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @PolitiBunny post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.03 posts per day across the measured window.