Pirate Wires engagement report
@PirateWires - 1.6M followers on X
Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 54 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.239% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 38% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 701x its own typical post.
Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Pirate Wires's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.003%, Pirate Wires sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 96% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 4% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 466 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 28, 2026701x their median
Enough of this renaming lakes and gulfs. We got to the moon first. The moon shall henceforth be known as the MOON OF AMERICA.
- Aug 12, 202649x their median
Nithya Raman is getting TORCHED by her own colleagues as she tries to lie about her unmitigated failure as chair of the Homelessness and Housing Committee. âYou ran it like a lecture hall at a university, not a place of governmentâ. Nithya is a scammer who ruined our city. https://t.co/kjNg5ZQ9Ra
- Aug 4, 202678x their median
As someone who now employs 20somethings, I often think about how nuts it was that my drug-addicted Vice bosses let me... edit a billion dollar website from my dorm room. I wrote about the insanity and lessons I learned from my Vice days for @PirateWires https://t.co/zFUHXnsarj
- Oct 25, 202641x their median
We finally get flying cars, and somehow that's fascist too. Imagine being so poisoned by the internet that you canât enjoy anything anymore. https://t.co/PnXcdR4krE
- Aug 31, 202641x their median
In less than a decade, the internet went from free and open to one of the most heavily moderated spaces in public life. Beginning in 2015, every major platform created strict, but extremely vague and opaque, ideological content rules backed up by a colossal moderation and censorship apparatus. NGOs, the US government, and foreign actors (notably, the EU) helped. Hundreds of millions of dollars were spent on speech policing, which often went by the Orwellian term âtrust and safety.â The scale of censorship has no precedent. Tens of millions of accounts were suppressed or banned. Billions of posts were removed. A professional historian could spend their entire career chronicling it. McCarthyism is taught in schools, and online censorship of the 2010s is orders of magnitude larger than McCarthyism ever was. Here, a full history chronicling exactly how major platforms (YouTube, Twitter, Amazon, Reddit, Facebook) silenced dissident speech, from @arctotherium42 đ
- Sep 21, 202637x their median
Californiaâs Democratic nominee for governor, Xavier Becerra, as head of HHS, once led the department responsible for a child-migrant facility costing $92,608 per cot â and it may have sent kids to trafficking rings. The facility cost taxpayers $782 million. Roughly 8,450 unaccompanied migrant children passed through in under a year. Its job was to care for kids and place them with safe âsponsorsâ (family members or other relatives). According to interviews obtained by Pirate Wires, the facility prioritized speed over safety. A case manager said sponsors submitted obviously fake IDs, and ID checks were âroutinely ignored.â Another worker allegedly raised alarm bells about ~200 migrant kids whoâd gone to a single location; when this worker contacted a child trafficking hotline, they were promptly fired. A separate investigation by Chuck Grassley found that HHS, under Becerraâs watch, sent kids home with sponsors tied to MS-13. And a 2023 New York Times investigation found that some kids were released to trafficking rings, where they ended up cleaning slaughterhouses, suffering chemical burns, or performing hard labor prohibited for minors (in some cases, children died). Becerra is leading in the polls. He brands himself the âsafe choiceâ given his 30-plus years in government⌠and claims to âprotectâ âmarginalized communities.â âŚBut his record tells a very different story. Our full investigation, via @nicolewizman1 đ
- Aug 4, 202632x their median
In the 2010s, VICE was peak hipster American culture. The brand was known for loudly breaking taboos. Its cofounder, Gavin McInnes, would go on to found the Proud Boys and get banned from basically every social media platform for âhate speech.â By the mid-2010s, what began as an alt magazine in Montreal had landed an HBO show and convinced Rupert Murdoch and Disney to invest. It was, at one point, worth almost $6 billion. A decade later, it was bankrupt. @BCC_Mitchell, the youngest employee at Vice in 2012, takes us inside their rise and fall â from drug-fueled editorial meetings, to the CEO throwing $1m in cash at staff during a holiday party, to the team starting to chase âwokeâ for clicks⌠âŚto, eventually, the CEO himself abandoning what made the company famous in the first place. âVice was a cult,â Mitchell writes. âIt was also the best business school on Earth.â Below, the deepest insider profile yet of a 2010s media giant đ
- Oct 4, 202629x their median
When did modern feminism go from fighting for womenâs equality to absolving them of any and all responsibility? https://t.co/YwTlIR4P0t
- Sep 8, 202622x their median
When the FCC approved Starlinkâs second-gen satellites, environmental groups took the agency to court, alleging âdiminishment in the enjoyment of the dark sky.â When Starlink wanted to lower its satellites, a competitor made bogus claims about space debris. No more. Now, the FCC is ending this kind of NIMBYism by eliminating its environmental reviews for space tech. Full story from @JonasYDu đ
- Oct 13, 202616x their median
read it, share it, save the city: a san francisco voter guide for people who aren't insane https://t.co/HCBd9fcYSf
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 54 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.239% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 38% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 701x its own typical post.
- What is Pirate Wires's engagement rate on X?
- Pirate Wires (@PirateWires) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 56 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,600,623 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.003%, Pirate Wires sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @PirateWires have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @PirateWires post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.17 posts per day across the measured window.