Back to @PhilosophyOnX's profile

PHILOSOPHY | φιλοσοφία engagement report

@PhilosophyOnX - 378K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.131%
of 378K followers
Per impression
3.43%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
3.81%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
495
interactions (median)
Saved
0.055%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.1/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 495 interactions against 378K followers, an engagement rate of 0.131%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 3.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #brownshoesfascist.

Compared with accounts its own size

PHILOSOPHY | φιλοσοφία's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.131%, PHILOSOPHY | φιλοσοφία sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.695%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,270 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.695%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video27% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link27% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 27% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 334 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 7, 202633x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Putin: “Once, I asked former French President Jacques Chirac, ‘Why is American leadership so aggressive and, in some cases, so narrow-minded?’ He replied to me in Russian: ‘Because they are uncultured people.’” https://t.co/DK5CH59TTf

    13K2.8K227141385K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202618x their median

    Guys … seriously? You SERIOUSLY think these fuckers are going to gift you a universal HIGH income? Did you just fall off the turnip truck? OMG. 🙄 Universal DIGITAL FOOD STAMPS and a police surveillance state. That’s what the peasants get. I cannot believe people are falling for this bullshit. https://t.co/gVz4kXG5g8

    6.6K1.5K855120119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202616x their median

    Listen to the words of retired Israeli generals speaking out against Israeli settlers terrorizing Palestinians in the West Bank. “This is ethnic cleansing." “Once a society behaves this way, that society is doomed.” Not another nickel for the extremist Netanyahu government. https://t.co/Gt0P7FFhLN

    5.6K2.1K32494219K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20269.0x their median

    Just when you thought the American security umbrella could not be more dead MBS called Trump twice yesterday - apparently in desperation - to get Trump to bomb the Houthis as the group made major advances against Saudi in a war that Saudi had restarted Trump declined https://t.co/GVJIH8fYiX

    3.3K85819787196K viewsView on X
  • Apr 29, 20263.5x their median

    From @WSJFreeEx via @WSJOpinion: Barack Obama’s most conspicuous political failure is that he governed in a way that made the nation receptive to Donald Trump, writes @jackbutler4815 https://t.co/z0JncmC2Yt

    986153458133340K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.4x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Former U.S. counterterrorism chief Joe Kent: The Houthis’ rapid advance is just the beginning of the blowback effects we are now going to face as a result of our counterproductive policies in the Middle East & because of this senseless war in Iran. The Houthi’s ability to capture key terrain and strategic ports along the Red Sea coast speaks to not just their military capabilities but also to their ability to gain support from tribes far from the traditional Houthi strongholds in northern Yemen. This is very significant—these tribes are predominantly Sunni, while the Houthis are Zaydi Shias. Yemen is a tribal region—deals among rivals are frequently cut before or during battles, and even then those alliances can be murky. Now, however, the Houthis are fighting alongside the IRGC as a member of the axis of resistance against the Saudis, the U.S., and Israel. This has given them far more popular support than a standard tribal deal or a military victory ever could—not because Yemenis support or particularly care about the Iranians, but because especially during times of conflict, we go tribal. It’s human nature. The Yemenis have witnessed what the U.S.-backed Saudis have done to their people and what the U.S. backed Israelis have done to the people of Gaza, & see how the Iranians are fighting back after the U.S. & Israel attacked them. Now, they’re uniting against their common enemy to fight back. The U.S.’s war in Iran & simultaneous backing of the Saudis’ war in Yemen, along with our government’s support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza, have given the Iranian Islamic revolution a massive boost that has reached far beyond Iran. As our war against Iran drags on we will see more of this, especially in Iraq, Lebanon & potentially Bahrain. Our own policies and interventions abroad are encouraging radicalization, which will in turn inspire blowback terrorism here in the U.S. This is a destructive self-licking ice cream cone and it’s going to get more people killed. President Trump and his advisors know better, and know that ending our foreign entanglements now is in the best interest of the American people. The question is whether they have the moral courage to do it.

    1.1K474596081K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.3x their median

    People love to talk about social construction, but nobody seems to have a clear account of what they mean by it. So here’s a primer John Searle’s The Construction of Social Reality, one of my all-time favourite works of philosophy. 1/ https://t.co/ZF1wIrNN3t

    1.4K159552763K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20261.6x their median

    The Tel Aviv flight threat is just the start of October surprises in the Iran War escalation trap Iran’s 45-day deadline expired today, and a 'triple-urgency' nuclear exit is on the table Both clocks are ticking Read my full analysis here: https://t.co/9HCSVVtwKu

    6808825661K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    The Houthis have seized control of Yemen's entire Red Sea coast, which means control over another key global choke point for commodities like oil and maritime trade.

    50781361226K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    "إيران طبقت الحظر الذي فرضته أميركا على عراق صدام في التسعينات بحذافيره، استفادت منه وجنت المليارات من عدم تصدير النفط العراقي في حين أن الولائيين في العراق اليوم يطالبون بكسر الحظر المفروض على إيران" مما قاله ضيفنا اليوم👇🏻 https://t.co/Wm8uTk2Fip

    4078024118K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#brownshoesfascist

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 495 interactions against 378K followers, an engagement rate of 0.131%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 3.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

What is PHILOSOPHY | φιλοσοφία's engagement rate on X?
PHILOSOPHY | φιλοσοφία (@PhilosophyOnX) has an engagement rate of 0.131%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 378,453 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.131%, PHILOSOPHY | φιλοσοφία sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PhilosophyOnX have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PhilosophyOnX post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going