Back to @PeterStefanovi2's profile

Peter Stefanovic engagement report

@PeterStefanovi2 - 533K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.102%
of 533K followers
Per impression
3.17%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
3.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
546
interactions (median)
Saved
0.05%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.23/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 546 interactions against 533K followers, an engagement rate of 0.102%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 3.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.6K interactions, about 42x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bbcbreakfast, #chinookjustice, #pmqs.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026. Recurring tags: #bbcbreakfast, #chinookjustice, #pmqs.

Compared with accounts its own size

Peter Stefanovic's engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 80% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.102%, Peter Stefanovic sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link31% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 191 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 5, 202642x their median

    Let’s call this bull**** out TOGETHER The 200,000 illegal migrants figure Farage is using is over several years and let’s remind ourselves how we got into this mess in the first place - BREXIT And now in threatening to punish those parts of the country where people don’t vote his way the Reform party leader is betraying the basic principles of democracy - its shameless and grotesque bullying which shows nothing but contempt for voters

    6.1K2.8K575931.2M viewsView on X
  • Apr 2, 202627x their median

    🚨KEIR STARMER IS SPEARHEADING ONE OF THE MOST SHOCKING ATTACKS ON CIVIL LIBERTIES IN MODERN TIMES The government has absolutely no mandate to do this. Labour never mentioned in its manifesto that it planned to undermine and restrict a fundamental cornerstone of our democracy - the right to trial by jury - a move which will place us on a path toward authoritarian justice. But it’s not too late for the government to listen to the thousands of voices of victims, judges, barristers, other legal professionals and academics who oppose this blatant act of constitutional vandalism. CONTACT YOUR MP NOW and ask them to step up and protect this cherished and precious cornerstone of our democracy

    3.4K2.2K135741.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20269.0x their median

    Majority of Britons agree with Prime Minister Andy Burnham that Brexit was ‘wrong turn’ for UK https://t.co/xa7KF0fu1M

    3.0K5511.3K7851K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 20265.7x their median

    Nigel Farage and Reform UK want to - leave the European Convention on Human Rights which protects our right to protest, our right to privacy, our right to fair trials and so much more - repeal the Equality Act - a key piece of legislation that prevents against discrimination in Britain - Strip back workers rights - Lift restrictions on exploitative zero-hours contracts and Legalize "fire and rehire" tactics - repeal the Renters’ Rights Act which abolishes “no fault evictions” that allow landlords to remove tenants without giving a reason and introduces new duties over health hazards and to sell all this to the country Farage offers nothing in return but grievance and division. PLEASE DON’T FALL FOR IT. That anyone could be supporting Farage and Reform with these policies must surely be a damning indictment of UK media in failing to explain all this to the public

    1.6K1.0K354441.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20265.3x their median

    Andy Burnham says he holds Nigel Farage 'significantly responsible' for UK's miserable decade https://t.co/mabkyYxi6Z

    2.2K4102362120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20265.1x their median

    ‘£30 billion lost’: Six major studies confirm Brexit’s HUGE toll on UK economy In 10 days' time, MPs will be summoned to debate the economic impact of Brexit. https://t.co/BD5jNICprH

    1.7K7483093936K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20265.1x their median

    Andy Burnham first PM to confirm Kremlin role in Brexit vote The prime minister has revealed UK authorities told him there was ‘clear evidence’ that Moscow meddled in the referendum https://t.co/uWmiogcZLr

    1.5K4468086864K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20264.4x their median

    “The decade of low growth has partly been the result of BREXIT and the sooner the party opposite accepts that the more we can start to face up to Britains future” Prime Minister Andy Burnham #PMQs 👏 https://t.co/q3I9yYGSKg

    1.8K3901471830K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20263.8x their median

    "I think that the majority of people in Britain know that leaving the EU was a mistake" Chair of the Foreign Affairs Select Comittee, Dame Emily Thornberry MP, says she wants the next Labour manifesto to include rejoining the EU https://t.co/zqz5LwUoEP

    1.2K2455862829K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20263.5x their median

    “Brexit cost an estimated £90 billion in lost tax revenue in 2025 alone. That money could have eased the tax burden on working people and funded our NHS and public services” @monicabeharding https://t.co/cKFuVTQ4MJ

    1.0K4783692227K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bbcbreakfast#chinookjustice#pmqs

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 546 interactions against 533K followers, an engagement rate of 0.102%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 3.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.6K interactions, about 42x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bbcbreakfast, #chinookjustice, #pmqs.

What is Peter Stefanovic's engagement rate on X?
Peter Stefanovic (@PeterStefanovi2) has an engagement rate of 0.102%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 532,846 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.102%, Peter Stefanovic sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PeterStefanovi2 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PeterStefanovi2 post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going