Back to @PeterLBrandt's profile

The Factor Report engagement report

@PeterLBrandt - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.027%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.621%
58K views on a typical post
Reach
4.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
360
interactions (median)
Saved
0.095%
55 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.6/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 360 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Posts are seen about 58K times each, and 0.621% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 43x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #factormembers, #watchlist, #ascendingtriangle.

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #factormembers, #watchlist, #ascendingtriangle.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.027%, The Factor Report sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video74% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link12% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 12% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 281 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 18, 202643x their median

    Cracow, late sunday evening. 18.10.2026. France vs. Poland tonight. https://t.co/AEqb2IXw6w

    13K1.8K4851391.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202613x their median

    "Microsoft’s new data center in Wisconsin will use about only four Olympic swimming pools of water this year, half as much as a car wash. Golf courses use about 30 times more water than data centers." https://t.co/6Gf9BXwHhC

    3.6K66029357122K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20269.7x their median

    I am facing issues that are really weighing on me heavily. I used to think the world was entertaining. It now just seems like a total shit show. They are still vaccinating kids with lethal shit. Pharma still tries to find good drugs but will market bad ones. Those marketing SNRIs and SSRIs should be tried for mass murder. Addictions to these drugs are worse than heroin addictions. While on this topic, Fauci should be taken to the Hague. Boys are still beating up girls in girls sports. What kind of psychopath supports this crap? Where were the women during this story? Why didn't you shut this shit down? You think you are feminists. Where are you when it counts? I thought the kids on campus were looking healthy. But then I realized that it is the influence of social media. One girl told me that friends are taking Ozempic. What looked like good health may be poor mental health. It is Generation Anorexia (Gen A). People complain about taxes while being too stupid to recognize it is the spending not the taxing. We spent all our money killing millions of innocents in the Middle East for no apparent reason. The most grounded leader in the world right now is Vlad Putin. Bring on your criticisms you fuckwads, but I am right, and it is appalling. I got attacked last year for quoting George Patton. You know who you are. You can eat shit. We can't oppose the war in Iran without being called antisemites. Militant Zionists are the cause of rising antisemitism. Even if AI doesn't destroy civilization and even if it does a lot of good, it is still gonna suck. Articles about this shit show are put out by lazy people using AI, making them soul-free crap. I cannot stand reading AI written articles. If you are writing articles using AI you are irrelevant. Your graphics are total shit, because you used a machine that has no idea what is needed to capture and retain my attention. I used to enjoy writing about the world, and now I have no interest in competing against the tsunami of retarded shit writing about topics that are retarded shits. I think this is why I like podcasts: they are people at least...unless they are AI generated.

    2.8K33131748151K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20268.5x their median

    26 years ago, when I was starting with charting/trading and investments if someone gave me this advice, I would thank him/her every single day: Print this chart. Put it on your desk. Expand your research/investment universe. Look for only 1 setup. The setup that is on this chart. Go and look for this setup, if possible, across 2000 charts. All your trades will be executed through this basic chart pattern setup. When you revisit the charts you will be able to identify the setup you traded again and again. You can thank me later. Don't forget to print it.

    2.6K27112925290K viewsView on X
  • Jan 19, 20269.7x their median

    58k to $62k is where I think it is going $BTC If it does not go there I will NOT be ashamed, so I do not need to see you trolls screen shot this in the future I am wrong 50% of the time. It does not bother me to be wrong https://t.co/NDOuSrqLwa

    2.4K26535955329K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20267.0x their median

    If you want to bet on a long shot (next few years), stellar:native is a good pick https://t.co/g5VmqMnInp

    2.1K23912539224K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20266.6x their median

    Close to 80 years old. Physically disabled - wheelchair at airport, walker when shopping, walking stick at home. Losing parts of my memory bank, little bit hard of hearing. Mostly at doctors appointments when not at the computer. Been supporting myself from the futures markets since 1975 when Gerald Ford took the office of president of the US when Tricky Dick Nixon resigned and Microsoft was founded. Thinking about retiring in a couple ways Not from futures trading company's for my own personal account. Probably will never quit. It's good I always carry stop orders on every position I hold. Personal on Twitter X is a yes for quitting - the way I think about trading is mostly thought of as arcane by the "moderns" - surprised because it works better than it might have in the early 1900s. Thoughtful engagement on X is all but history Probably phase out, then quit on Teaching -- there just are not that many people interested in learning the geometrically-described hieroglyphics of price discovery of the olden days. I have seen during my time dozens of schemes for trading come, then go

    2.1K392598187K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20266.4x their median

    It is not necessary to be a certified cult member to be an interested owner of a crypto $XRP The charts alone have always been enough reason for us to make a bet There is a difference between being open minded and having a hole in the dead https://t.co/YAnP0GGBBV

    2.0K2237054261K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20266.1x their median

    This is a very significant possible longer term look at $SOL https://t.co/Wd3DHSlEiu

    2.0K1535528203K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20265.7x their median

    This is my long-term chart of ethereum:native It implies an eventual move to 8,600 once 5,000 is handled A claim of a "call" or simple presentation of a chart is NOT a trade People who claim "trades" need to provide proof or else the claims are BS An X post is NOT proof https://t.co/I2OFkn0Ne6

    1.9K1633112115K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#factormembers#watchlist#ascendingtriangle#crudeoil#descendingtriangle

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 360 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Posts are seen about 58K times each, and 0.621% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 43x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #factormembers, #watchlist, #ascendingtriangle.

What is The Factor Report's engagement rate on X?
The Factor Report (@PeterLBrandt) has an engagement rate of 0.027%, based on the median interactions across 78 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,348,824 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.027%, The Factor Report sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PeterLBrandt have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @PeterLBrandt post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going