Peter H. Diamandis, MD engagement report
@PeterDiamandis - 422K followers on X
Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 744 interactions against 422K followers, an engagement rate of 0.177%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 2.69% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.
Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Peter H. Diamandis, MD's engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.177%, Peter H. Diamandis, MD sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 13% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 13% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 207 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 30, 202625x their median
Everyone knows the trillion-dollar version of SpaceX. Almost nobody remembers that Elon's first rocket failed three times, and there was money for exactly only one more attempt. DO NOT be afraid to fail.
- Aug 22, 202610x their median
The best longevity advice right now is embarrassingly simple: sleep 8 hours, move your body, eat real food, manage your stress, and cultivate an optimistic mindset. Don't die from something stupid.
- Sep 3, 20268.0x their median
The phone in your pocket has vastly more raw computing power, memory, and storage than the Apollo Guidance Computer that helped land humans on the Moon in 1969.
- Aug 31, 20267.9x their median
I do not want more years because I am afraid of dying. I want them because I am not finished being curious, and curiosity is the one appetite that has never once shrunk with age.
- Aug 29, 20267.1x their median
Elon predicted 100x gains in AI intelligence at fixed model size. It was at the edge of plausibility when he said it. Turns out it's now a fact. We are nowhere near the ceiling.
- Aug 25, 20266.1x their median
Most of what is frightening you about the future was probably written by people with no intention of building any of it.
- Sep 22, 20265.0x their median
If AI gave you back 2 hours a day, that's 730 hours a year. What would you do with them? Spend more time with your kids? Get healthy? Start the business you've been putting off? That's the conversation about the future of tech I want to have. What becomes possible when people get part of their lives back?
- Aug 21, 20264.5x their median
While pessimism sounds smart, optimism makes money by turning life-changing technologies into reality.
- Aug 29, 20263.1x their median
Reusable rockets broke the cost curve, and when the price of orbit collapses, we're going to open an entire economy above your head. Welcome to [soon] to space.
- Aug 28, 20262.8x their median
Optimists live 11–15% longer and are far more likely to reach age 85. That's not a motivational poster... If you don't believe me, it's peer-reviewed research on a study of 70,000+ people.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 744 interactions against 422K followers, an engagement rate of 0.177%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 2.69% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.
- What is Peter H. Diamandis, MD's engagement rate on X?
- Peter H. Diamandis, MD (@PeterDiamandis) has an engagement rate of 0.177%, based on the median interactions across 76 original posts from the last 30 days against 422,259 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.177%, Peter H. Diamandis, MD sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @PeterDiamandis have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @PeterDiamandis post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.57 posts per day across the measured window.