Back to @Peston's profile

Robert Peston engagement report

@Peston - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 98 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.006%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.2%
39K views on a typical post
Reach
3.11%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
78
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.33/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 78 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 98 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 0.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 98 posts sampled, 10% carry an image or video and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 29x its own typical post.

Measured over 98 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #peston.

Compared with accounts its own size

Robert Peston's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, Robert Peston sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video10% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link40% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 10% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 40% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 308 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 202629x their median

    Rabbi Jeremy Gordon of the New London Synagogue has written an important column about the UK government’s sanctions against the unlawful Israeli settlements in the Occupied Territories: “I do not share with those who feel that lovers of Israel, and supporters of Jewish life in this country must oppose, as a matter of course, sanctions designed to limit and draw attention to the damage caused by settler extremists. The British Government is saying they are not prepared to legitimise terrorism, settlements and policies that eliminate the possibility of a political resolution. That should be a cause we should support.”

    1.8K4245121135K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202620x their median

    Burnham gives his diagnosis of what went wrong - “homes, water, energy, transport, care - broken up and sold off”. He receives a standing ovation

    1.3K103148741K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202619x their median

    Given that Reform is confident it will be able to keep both Delo’s and Harborne’s £36m donations, both of them must have relocated to the UK. If so, that presumably means they are prepared to incur tax liabilities in the UK here and now, as residents, seemingly for what they see as the benefits of installing Nigel Farage as prime minister. This is in paradoxically stark contrast to other billionaires, like Chris Rokos, who are leaving the UK to escape liability to potentially higher taxes they fear will be imposed by the current government under Andy Burnham (such as a reform of capital gains tax)

    1.0K20420918196K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202618x their median

    Burnham promises a new politics. He does not want any party to govern with less than 30% of the vote. So he announces a new national commission on electoral reform. He secures another standing ovation

    1.1K9913617120K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202617x their median

    Burnham is either one of the most adept political operators or unbelievably lucky. Because for President Trump to say that the relationship with the UK was “more up” than under Sir Keir Starmer - when he and Burnham are miles apart on everything from Israel sanctions to Diego Garcia’s new lease - is quite something, for their first face-to-face meeting (in answer to @romillyweeks @itvnews question)

    9586930231382K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202614x their median

    This is big: he confirms in 2030 the triple lock will change. The pension triple lock will no longer rise in line with earnings every year, but by the higher of inflation or 2.5%, with periodic adjustments if earnings in the economy are rising higher. He says big savings will be delivered

    6946028440187K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202613x their median

    Badenoch announces no one will pay inheritance tax on the value of the family home. Which brings the risk that no older person will sell before they die. Oh dear. And she says she will add £1m to the tax free inheritance tax threshold

    4955342532236K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202613x their median

    In the summer of 2021, the current Tory shadow chancellor Andrew Griffith called for the Triple Lock to be put to one side because it was delivering what he viewed as an excessive increase in the state pension. And he hoped “that we can build consensus on what should not really be a subject of controversy but a sensible and pragmatic response to post pandemic management of the economy.” Bit Burnhamesque all that https://t.co/lXdI0R96q2

    6772276223291K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202612x their median

    Burnham says he will break the link between energy prices and the international gas price

    719551612871K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202612x their median

    1/ One of the strange things about the current AI boom: I believe that Dario, Ilya and other leaders of AGI focused companies have been explicit to the VCs funding them that they believe there is a possibility their technology could lead to human extinction.

    7801211813403K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#peston

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 78 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 98 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 0.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 98 posts sampled, 10% carry an image or video and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 29x its own typical post.

What is Robert Peston's engagement rate on X?
Robert Peston (@Peston) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 98 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,253,674 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, Robert Peston sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Peston have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Peston post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going