Back to @PermissionIO's profile

Permission engagement report

@PermissionIO - 55K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.405%
of 55K followers
Per impression
10.5%
2.2K views on a typical post
Reach
3.86%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
227
interactions (median)
Saved
0.139%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 227 interactions against 55K followers, an engagement rate of 0.405%. Posts are seen about 2.2K times each, and 10.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 56K interactions, about 245x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.405%, Permission sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,991 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.68%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,991 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 147 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 25, 2026245x their median

    Addiction to short-form videos reduces brain activity in the frontal lobe weakening the ability to focus. https://t.co/fMOdMhDx7V

    43K10K7271.6K10M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    “No company should profit from keeping a child compulsively engaged on screen.” RFK Jr. is putting social media companies on notice: stop profiting from addicting children to screens and start protecting them. “Big Tech has to act to protect our children.” “Meta announced new protections for children and called on the rest of the industry to follow suit.” “I welcome those steps.” “Now every technology company should act.” “End addictive design features for children, give parents real control, make safety the default.”

    230661866.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    Your $ASK wallet is now powered by @coinbase. Key export. Cross-chain support. Institutional-grade security. All baked in. https://t.co/HmdOklNoMk

    115951522.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    121,000+ $ASK users on @base and growing. Family Friendly AI is the killer utility. https://t.co/itjEWUSNHC

    105911801.5K viewsView on X
  • Feb 27, 2026

    To our community, Together, we built the operational foundation for individual data ownership. It works. It’s validated. Now we’re taking it where it matters most. Families. https://t.co/m97cReQL4J

    98706317K viewsView on X
  • Feb 19, 2026

    Zuckerberg’s back in court, again. This time over how Meta’s platforms are engineered & what they’re optimized to do. The major issue: kids are being pulled into casino-style addiction loops. The 'Tobacco 2.0' trial exposes the machine as a delivery system for addiction, not connection.

    8561711.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026

    🇺🇸 A New Mexico judge just ordered Meta to pay $942 million after finding the company exposed kids to harmful experiences on its platforms. $375 million in penalties, and another $567 million into a fund meant to address the damage. It’s the biggest hit Meta has taken yet over child safety, and a clear signal that courts are done treating these issues as simple “tech problems.” Silicon Valley is watching, parents are watching, and Meta is appealing. Source: Business Insider / Writer: Val

    882624239K viewsView on X
  • Mar 26, 2026

    They knew. They lied. Now the jury has spoken. Meta & YouTube found liable for designing addictive platforms that harmed minors. Anxiety. Depression. Body dysmorphia. This victim's story is not unique. https://t.co/HaHi0grR2s

    1011340648 viewsView on X
  • Apr 9, 2026

    Weekly Quick Earns are BACK. Your wallet. Your $ASK. Your earnings: all intact. Log in and earn → https://t.co/knXZYrOOFB Or run it here🔽 https://t.co/7XP92cyc44

    585030965 viewsView on X
  • Apr 7, 2026

    School Breaks means less structure, more devices, and platforms that are literally designed to keep kids scrolling. Here's what's actually happening and what to do about it. https://t.co/i555a4Mwdj

    575110655 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 227 interactions against 55K followers, an engagement rate of 0.405%. Posts are seen about 2.2K times each, and 10.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 56K interactions, about 245x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Permission's engagement rate on X?
Permission (@PermissionIO) has an engagement rate of 0.405%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 55,443 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.405%, Permission sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,991 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PermissionIO have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @PermissionIO post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going