Héctor Suárez Gomís engagement report
@PelonGomis - 616K followers on X
Measured over 67 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 3.8K interactions against 616K followers, an engagement rate of 0.624%. Measured over 67 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 12.9% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 67 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 5.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #brasil, #brasildecide, #elecciones.
Measured over 67 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #brasil, #brasildecide, #elecciones.
Compared with accounts its own size
Héctor Suárez Gomís's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.624%, Héctor Suárez Gomís sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 93% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 1% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 93% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 650 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 29, 20265.9x their median
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣... https://t.co/H0oZWSqnTm
- Aug 23, 20265.4x their median
La @_LizVilchis de 2026 pide que no la juzguemos por la Liz de 2014... ¡El problema es que la Liz de 2014 ya había juzgado a la Liz de 2026! 🤣 https://t.co/2Td3jl4EKc
- Sep 29, 20265.2x their median
No se burlen de Andrea Chávez @AndreaChavezTre, no sean cabrones. Imaginense lo difícil que debe de ser violar la ley electoral durante meses para poder sacar ventaja y descubrir finalmente que al único lugar al que sí llegaste primero que nadie... ¡Fue a tu propia derrota! 💥 https://t.co/Ikhb7igWfm
- Aug 25, 20264.9x their median
Treinta conexiones alrededor de Andy. ¡Treinta! Y el inepto de su papá se la pasó seis años preocupado por cuánto gana Loret. 🤣 ¡No son iguales! Antes había círculos de poder... ¡Ahora hay círculos de bienestar! Me queda claro que no es nepotismo... ¡Es continuidad genética del proyecto de nación!
- Sep 28, 20264.7x their median
Amílcar Olán se fue a Suiza para esconderse y su plan le salió igual que el balasto que le vendió al gobierno... ¡De la chingada! https://t.co/wpszWRb5pH
- Sep 25, 20264.7x their median
Un país que encuentra dientes de leche en una fosa clandestina debería detenerse, mirar esos dientes y preguntarse: ¿Qué carajos nos está pasando? ¿En qué momento nos volvimos tan insensibles? ¿En qué momento empezamos a ver a nuestros hermanos mexicanos como un pinche número más dentro de una estadística? Y si la respuesta nos incomoda... ¡Qué bueno, que nos incomode y nos haga reaccionar! Tal vez todavía nos queda algo que no podemos permitir que también desaparezca... ¡La capacidad de horrorizarnos y de exigir respuestas sin importar quién nos gobierne, sin importar quién está en el poder, sin importar el nombre del partido que tenga que dar la cara! Esos niños ya no tienen voz y si no hacemos algo radical y muy pronto, nosotros también vamos a perder la nuestra.
- Jul 6, 20263.7x their median
¡Orgullosísimo de la Selección Mexicana! 🇲🇽 ¡Qué chingón Mundial jugaron! No me interesa buscar culpables, no me interesa reclamar, no me interesa ver los errores... ¡Prefiero agradecer! ¡Gracias! ¡Gracias! ¡Gracias! GRACIAS, Javier Aguirre, Rafa Márquez, Memo Ochoa (lo mejor para lo que viene), Tala, Acevedo, Montes, Reyes, Sánchez, Vázquez, Edson, Gallardo, Mateo (qué golazo contra Chequia), Fidalgo (hermano ya eres mexicano), Quiñones (los mexicanos nacemos donde se nos dé la chingada gana), Brian, Romo, Chávez, Vargas, Orbelín, Chino, Alexis, Hormiga, Memote, Santi, Raúl... Y dejo al final a los tres que me parece que la reventaron en el Mundial: ¡Morita, Lira y Alvarado! Hay derrotas que saben a fracaso... ¡Esta sabe a futuro! Inglaterra ganó y clasificó a cuartos de final. ¡Felicidades, son un equipazo! Toda la suerte contra Noruega. La Selección Mexicana ganó algo que llevaba muchos años buscando... ¡Confianza, buen futbol y volver a creer! No hay razón para convertir esta derrota en una tragedia nacional... Nunca vi a un equipo derrotado, vi un grupo de jugadores que se vaciaron por completo. No somos una potencia, nos falta muchísimo. ¡Muchísimo! Sí, perdimos contra Inglaterra, pero dejamos de perder contra nosotros mismos. Insisto en que prefiero agradecer porque es muy fácil señalar, insultar, criticar y reclamar cómodamente desde un sillón. Antes del 11 de junio, la gran mayoría de los mexicanos no esperábamos que se hiciera un buen Mundial y hoy estamos cabizbajos porque queríamos llegar más lejos... ¡Ese cambio de expectativa, se lo debemos a ellos! Gracias Selección Mexicana porque durante estas semanas, los mexicanos olvidamos todas nuestras diferencias para abrazar un mismo sueño. Gracias por recordarnos el país que somos cuando decidimos olvidar las divisiones y todos empezamos a sentirnos parte de la misma historia. ¡Viva México! 🇲🇽 💚🤍❤️
- Aug 31, 20264.0x their median
El príncipe Andy dice que la austeridad republicana empieza hasta después de pagar la cuenta. El problema no es ir a un buen restaurante... ¡El problema con estos ridículos y vulgares "izquierdistas" de caviar (y de mierda), es que desayunan moral y cenan privilegios! https://t.co/ljNqqwoiJL
- Sep 29, 20263.6x their median
Andrea no se adelantó a los tiempos electorales... ¡Se adelantó al ridículo! Andrea no perdió la candidatura... ¡Perdió el futuro en el que ya vivía! Lo que no nos ha dicho, es si todavía va a ser presidenta de México a pesar de no haberse quedado con la gubernatura de Chihuahua. Lo maravilloso de la arrogancia es que viene sin cinturón de seguridad. 👇🏼 👇🏼 👇🏼
- Aug 24, 20263.5x their median
QUIÉN ES QUIÉN EN LAS LIZ VILCHIS... Liz Vilchis acaba de desmentir a Liz Vilchis utilizando como fuente a Liz Vilchis. https://t.co/Bvqd8eghou
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 3.8K interactions against 616K followers, an engagement rate of 0.624%. Measured over 67 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 12.9% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 67 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 5.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #brasil, #brasildecide, #elecciones.
- What is Héctor Suárez Gomís's engagement rate on X?
- Héctor Suárez Gomís (@PelonGomis) has an engagement rate of 0.624%, based on the median interactions across 67 original posts from the last 30 days against 616,247 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.624%, Héctor Suárez Gomís sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @PelonGomis have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @PelonGomis post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.97 posts per day across the measured window.