Back to @Peli_Comic's profile

Pelicomic engagement report

@Peli_Comic - 336K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.817%
of 336K followers
Per impression
8.91%
31K views on a typical post
Reach
9.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.282%
87 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 336K followers, an engagement rate of 0.817%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 8.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 69K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tag: #nycc.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pelicomic's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.817%, Pelicomic sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.679% to 2.56%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 157 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 202625x their median

    https://t.co/IbQKDxMnzZ

    67K1.8K99431.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202616x their median

    Las IA buenas dentro de la mente de Vision 🩶 https://t.co/WbVAMZPJ44

    41K2.0K4155673K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202612x their median

    Si nunca hubieran revelado que Robert Downey Jr. interpretará a Doctor Doom, ¿creen que el marketing de la película sería más fuerte o tendría menos impacto que ahora? https://t.co/nI9ejFiZGZ

    33K44528880912K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20268.5x their median

    Los hermanos Russo consideran que sería una “gran idea” hacer una película sobre Steve Rogers devolviendo las Gemas del Infinito después de Avengers Endgame. 🎬 https://t.co/uvwluEvU9W

    22K9567421205K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20267.3x their median

    Se dice que el trabajador de marketing de Calvin Klein fue ascendido a vicepresidente ejecutivo 📈 https://t.co/TXx5E5vwFZ

    19K5774813221K viewsView on X
  • Nov 3, 20245.8x their median

    ¡LO LOGREEE! ❤️:’) Elizabeth Olsen es más hermosa en persona y es increíble conocerla en cualquier universo. La Brujita se hizo canon en mi vida y le confirmé que era mi actriz favorita en la historia y mi crush máximo de Hollywood. Me siento dentro del HEX aaaaaa Hice un vlog conociéndola que ya esta en el canal: https://t.co/2OYFaWPPi6 ❤️❤️❤️

    15K62022865638K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.9x their median

    Cambios que podría tener el reestreno de Avengers Endgame Encore https://t.co/dhX8WGie0W

    13K221217182K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20264.1x their median

    Doom viendo que Sam Wilson le lanza el escudo luego de que ni la rompe tormentas lo pudo tocar: https://t.co/1VN4VKnqFT

    10K7945044232K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.6x their median

    Los diálogos escuchados en el trailer de Avengers Endgame Encore 👀💚 https://t.co/mVjDn3BJqa

    9.6K3005097K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.4x their median

    Le pidieron a David Harbour que recitara una frase que dirá su personaje en Avengers Doomsday y el actor respondió: 💬 “Tú… eres Tony Stark.” 👀😱 https://t.co/EIRawCvBc1

    8.9K267337148K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nycc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 336K followers, an engagement rate of 0.817%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 8.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 69K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

What is Pelicomic's engagement rate on X?
Pelicomic (@Peli_Comic) has an engagement rate of 0.817%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 335,932 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.817%, Pelicomic sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Peli_Comic have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Peli_Comic post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going