Back to @Peereira7's profile

Pereira engagement report

@Peereira7 - 339K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
1.27%
of 339K followers
Per impression
4.16%
102K views on a typical post
Reach
30.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.03%
31 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 4.2K interactions against 339K followers, an engagement rate of 1.27%. Posts are seen about 102K times each, and 4.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 30.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 10x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026. Recurring tag: #heretics10years.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.27%, Pereira sits above the 75th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.5% to 2.09%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99116.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 68,576 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 55,420 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile116.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video29% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 29% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 84 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 26, 202510x their median

    Os creíais que hablaba de coña???? Que pase el siguiente que le eche polla 😜😜😜😜😜😜😜 https://t.co/QKKh9JWMeQ

    40K1.3K1.5K1663.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20268.5x their median

    Gaston Edul es el peor boxeador que ha pisado la Velada, que verguenza

    34K1.0K783611.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20263.7x their median

    A MAMAR LOS COJONES BIEN MAMADO. HUMILLACION ABSOLUTA DELANTE DE TODO EL MUNDO. NO PODEIS ROBAR. NO PODEIS CON ESPAÑA. NO HAY MAS

    15K831831176K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20262.5x their median

    Si ganamos el Mundial me hago el peinado de Cucurella

    10K1461584354K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20262.2x their median

    Viruzz es histórico, no hay mas. Que peleon. Año tras año, dando el show a esto. Gero es increible, combatazo, wow

    9.1K1941091229K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.1x their median

    Quiero cambiarme el peinado, dejadme ideas

    8.9K311662745K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20262.1x their median

    Espero que todos os hayais levantado de la silla a aplaudir a Dani Olmo. MVP del Mundial de lejos

    8.7K218261108K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20261.9x their median

    Honor a Juan, no sabeis lo que es empezar un deporte de la nada desde 0 y subirse, aun encima, contra Grefg con esa experiencia y como es él, es loquisimo. Combatazo, mis dieces

    8.0K176190134K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20261.8x their median

    Keo fumando 40 porros al dia ha hecho el combate de la noche jojojojojojojo que la mamen coño

    7.5K174392183K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20261.7x their median

    https://t.co/4WFigUyTGw

    7.1K115353112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#heretics10years

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.2K interactions against 339K followers, an engagement rate of 1.27%. Posts are seen about 102K times each, and 4.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 30.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 10x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Pereira's engagement rate on X?
Pereira (@Peereira7) has an engagement rate of 1.27%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 339,246 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.27%, Pereira sits above the 75th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Peereira7 have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Peereira7 post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going