Back to @Pavinatto's profile

Pavinatto engagement report

@Pavinatto - 522K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.108%
of 522K followers
Per impression
3.71%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
2.90%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
560
interactions (median)
Saved
0.03%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 560 interactions against 522K followers, an engagement rate of 0.108%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 3.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 130K interactions, about 233x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pavinatto's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.108%, Pavinatto sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,782 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video6% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link56% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 6% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 56% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 135 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 17, 2026233x their median

    A reeleição do presidente Lula depende disso! https://t.co/JwgTzcVmXC

    79K33K15K2.9K1.6M viewsView on X
  • Apr 29, 20264.5x their median

    “Quando estiver no Supremo, não se esqueça dos amigos”. ——TRAMBIQUE, Soraya

    22K2.9K26858108K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202630x their median

    Sobre o Mussolini da Moóca: Em um país sério, teria renunciado. Em um país mais sério, seria impeachado. No Japão, teria se matado.

    15K1.6K25627119K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202627x their median

    Como funciona BRASÍLIA Por: Advogado, ex-juiz de direito, ex-delegado. Professor Samer Agi. https://t.co/YvtiEGyTSl

    12K2.6K180177864K viewsView on X
  • Apr 15, 20262.9x their median

    #URGENTE: Andrei, Gonet e Moraes (a trinca de satanaes) já começam a manipular o processo eleitoral que nem começou… preparem-se para mais uma eleição processualmente fraudada — lembrando que a de 2022 foi ILEGÍTIMA (em desacordo com a “legem”) em razão da resolução intempestiva de 20/10/22 (o prazo final era 05/03/22, conforme art. 105 da lei eleitoral) https://t.co/OosZWlq6VY

    12K3.0K2585298K viewsView on X
  • Apr 7, 20262.9x their median

    Messias não! Rejeitem a indicação de Jorge Messias ao STF - Assine a petição! https://t.co/QbOTAfJyU4 via @change_br

    11K3.6K26110761K viewsView on X
  • Apr 7, 20262.6x their median

    NÃO! MESSIAS NÃO. Nem que todos os pastores, bispos e apóstolos, nem que o papa o apoie, Messias é o alçapão no fundo do poço ao qual lançaram o #STF. Chame a atenção do seu SENADOR para esta explicação. https://t.co/vo0cGRRojA

    9.6K3.5K21911248K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 202622x their median

    Não gosto de dizer, mas o óbvio é ululante: 24 de junho é o dia em que Michelle derrotou a campanha de Flávio Bolsonaro.

    9.0K5402.8K124321K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 202622x their median

    Primeiro, Michelle azucrina, manda cortar cabeças de desafetos no PL e cria um núcleo para negociar apoios eleitorais. Depois, vem chorando desculpas, assim mesmo pedindo orações e chamando Moraes de “irmão em Cristo”. Então, a madrasta se rasga: faz vídeos com potencial implosivo aos planos presidenciais traçados pelo esposo, Jair Bolsonaro. Não contente, ela dobra a aposta e faz insinuações de escândalos no armário do enteado, tratando-o, a ele e aos irmãos, como irmãos do anticristo. Hoje, a Yoko Ono dos Bolsonaros fez um elogio ao Governo Lula. Não me espantaria se, amanhã ou depois, ela posasse nua.

    9.9K1.6K66080146K viewsView on X
  • Apr 29, 20262.1x their median

    Foi só a Soraya Trambique cobrar o voto sim, que o Messias se ferrou. Parabéns, Senado!

    11K898118847K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 560 interactions against 522K followers, an engagement rate of 0.108%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 3.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 130K interactions, about 233x its own typical post.

What is Pavinatto's engagement rate on X?
Pavinatto (@Pavinatto) has an engagement rate of 0.108%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 521,710 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.108%, Pavinatto sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Pavinatto have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Pavinatto post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going