Patricia de Lille engagement report
@PatriciaDeLille - 218K followers on X
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 218K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 0.592% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 379 interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #wedotourism, #southafrica, #tourismmonth2026.
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026. Recurring tags: #wedotourism, #southafrica, #tourismmonth2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Patricia de Lille's engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.01%, Patricia de Lille sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 431 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 9, 202617x their median
“The City of Cape Town has fundamentally miscalculated the psychological reality of their proposed 2026 Animal Keeping By-law, treating it like a sterile vehicle registration drive rather than what it actually is: a direct threat to our living, breathing family members. When you write legislation that targets material property, you invite legal backlash and strongly worded emails. You can impound a car or issue a zoning fine, and citizens will grumble, pay up, or hire a lawyer. But when you draft laws containing copy-paste errors anchored to warrantless search and seizure clauses for household animals, you cross a severe psychological red line. You trigger a primal, non-negotiable protective instinct. The public relations spin—that these extreme powers are only intended for severe cases like dog fighting—means absolutely nothing when the black-and-white text demands a permit and a fee for every single dog or cat. When ordinary residents read this poorly proofread, fifty-page rulebook, they don't picture illegal syndicates being busted; they imagine a municipal official showing up at their gate to confiscate their aging rescue dog over a lapsed piece of paper. That level of existential threat to a family unit does not invite bureaucratic compliance. It courts mass unrest. The City has dangerously overlooked the emotional contingency here. I see the perfect makings for a mass march to Parliament—dogs and all—to demand national intervention and the complete scrapping of this by-law effort. People will absolutely risk their own safety to protect their furry family members from municipal overreach. Frankly, I am completely taken aback that a massive, coordinated petition isn't already circulating to stop this dead in its tracks. I cannot see everyday citizens trusting that the standard "public comments" portal will have any real effect against a city administration that seems hell-bent on proving a point and pushing a regulatory agenda. City officials need to read the room: when you threaten living family members, you are stirring deep emotional responses that could quickly escalate into physical confrontation.” 🖊️ Stanley Bezuidenhout on FB
- Sep 27, 202612x their median
Limpopo, what a beautiful province with a variety of tourism experiences. We are Limpopo! #GoLimpopo #WeDoTourism #WTD2026 https://t.co/spnJ8BCE6t
- Sep 27, 202612x their median
Today Limpopo baptized me “Aunty Hunadi” #WeDoTourism #GoLimpopo #SouthAfrica #WTD2026 https://t.co/F2ewhZU71r
- Sep 27, 20262.5x their median
Today we celebrate World Tourism Day in Limpopo at the Legends Golf and Safari Lodge. Ever heard of the extreme 19th hole? #WeDoTourism #TourismMonth2026 #SouthAfrica https://t.co/rA8RoMFod2
- Sep 10, 20261.9x their median
What privilege it is to host the Saudi Minister of Hajj and Umrah Dr Al-Rabiah on his official visit to South Africa and show him some of the country’s attractions, like the iconic Table Mountain. #WeDoTourism #SouthAfrica https://t.co/svGotNwdXm
- Sep 29, 2026
As a South African CEO, if you are a patriot, how are you showing confidence in your country? This morning I addressed the @cnbcafrica CEO Business Breakfast on the economic power of Tourism. #WeDoTourism #SouthAfrica https://t.co/115OBAU2mK
- Sep 25, 2026
“Tourism Policy is Economic Policy”. That’s the message I’m delivering this morning at the World Economic Forum’s Beyond Tourism Day as co-chair of this inaugural initiative. @wef #BeyondTourism #WeDoTourism #SouthAfrica https://t.co/cdQG9EwLcl
- Oct 1, 2026
In August 2026 South Africa breached the 1 million arrivals in a single month. Thank You Mzansi! 1 005 286 people chose 🇿🇦 in August. Since January-August 2026, arrivals reached 7.5million. According to UN Tourism SA was the top H1 performer in Africa. #WeDoTourism #SouthAfrica https://t.co/c0um60hKDD
- Sep 23, 2026
🏠 Housing. Dignity. Accountability. Delivery. The housing crisis in Cape Town is not just a statistic; it is the reality for thousands of people living in informal settlements and communities across the Cape Flats. At Green Park informal settlement, GOOD is putting the issues facing these communities front and centre: access to decent housing, basic services, public land and meaningful opportunities to build better lives. GOOD was born out of a fight over housing in Cape Town, and that fight continues. No empty promises. No communities left behind. No government that only listens when election time comes. GOOD stands for a Cape Town where every community matters, every resident has a voice, and elected leaders are held accountable for delivering. This is what GOOD is fighting for. #GOODParty #VoteGOOD #CapeTown #HousingCrisis #LGE2026
- Sep 9, 2026
WELCOME TO SOUTH AFRICA 🇿🇦 Visitors from across the continent are invited to experience our people, places and cultures as tourism strengthens African unity and shared prosperity. #GovZAUpdates #TourismMonth2026 https://t.co/yWBQRKWAAf
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 218K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 0.592% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 379 interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #wedotourism, #southafrica, #tourismmonth2026.
- What is Patricia de Lille's engagement rate on X?
- Patricia de Lille (@PatriciaDeLille) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 218,325 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.01%, Patricia de Lille sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @PatriciaDeLille have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @PatriciaDeLille post?
- Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.77 posts per day across the measured window.