Back to @PatriCastill0's profile

Patricia Castillo engagement report

@PatriCastill0 - 345K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
4.02%
of 345K followers
Per impression
5.78%
240K views on a typical post
Reach
69.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
14K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.172%
414 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.87/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 14K interactions against 345K followers, an engagement rate of 4.02%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 240K times each, and 5.78% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 69.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 45K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Patricia Castillo's engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 4.02%, Patricia Castillo sits above the 90th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.09% to 119.9%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video63% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 204 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 20263.3x their median

    🚨 IT’S OFFICIAL: Argentina’s right-wing President Javier Milei has HALVED extreme poverty from 11% to 5%, and poverty from 30% to 17% He destroyed leftist socialism and his country is surging. LFG! Milei is great! 🇺🇸🇦🇷 https://t.co/22s66P6nsb

    39K5.7K901167925K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.2x their median

    🔴 ÚLTIMA HORA | El grupo de hackers que ha puesto en jaque a Marruecos avisa que va a publicar los datos originales de Pegasus relacionados con Sánchez Por Unai Cano (@unaicano10) https://t.co/BQmI0fnCNj

    22K6.3K2.0K4962.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.1x their median

    El miedo empieza a cambiar de bando. Familias, de todos los colores, unidos en defender su hogar. Eso no necesita mando único. Es un estallido de la gente normal, de infantería, que lleva un mes abandonada. https://t.co/xOnjmTwAvs

    22K6.6K27699276K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    - Han entrado 20 mil. - Fueron 80 mil. - Se han quedado 5 mil - En realidad 15 mil - No hay violaciones - Ya van más de 20 - No hay crisis sanitaria - Ahora hay que vacunarles - No hay conflictos - Se va a preparar un dispositivo para la vuelta al cole Un engaño tras otro.

    12K4.0K7450135K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    MÉTRO DE LONDRES .. RETOUR À L’ÈRE DU NEANDERTAL . https://t.co/z7IcfAMKBw

    7.2K2.5K1.1K3091000K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    🔴 Si hay una canción del verano que puede desbancar al “¡Pedro Sánchez, hijo de puta!” ES ESTA Y PUNTO Se la pones a tu conocido socialista de toda la vida, a ver si se le cae la cara de vergüenza que no tiene QUE RULE ESTA JOYA https://t.co/brwNsnkvKd

    4.5K1.9K8648204K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    Musulmanes de TODA Cataluña crean un partido islámico para concurrir en las próximas elecciones y GANAR a la extrema Derecha de AC y VOX. Según encuestas podrían obtener un buen puñado de escaños. Ya los tenemos aquí, NO hay vuelta ATRÁS https://t.co/Mf79VEn1pv

    1.4K9752617892K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    La izquierda es una enfermedad que no tiene límites. Si siguen así pudrirán el mundo.

    204615018K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 14K interactions against 345K followers, an engagement rate of 4.02%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 240K times each, and 5.78% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 69.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 45K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.

What is Patricia Castillo's engagement rate on X?
Patricia Castillo (@PatriCastill0) has an engagement rate of 4.02%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 344,697 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 4.02%, Patricia Castillo sits above the 90th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PatriCastill0 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PatriCastill0 post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going