Pastor Mark Driscoll engagement report
@PastorMark - 467K followers on X
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 467K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Posts are seen about 7.5K times each, and 0.428% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video, 27% are part of a thread and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 529K interactions, about 16544x its own typical post.
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.007%, Pastor Mark Driscoll sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,368 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.142% |
| 75th percentile | 0.672% |
| 90th percentile | 2.54% |
| 99th percentile | 82.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 55% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 42% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 42% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 129 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 17, 202516544x their median
It’s all about Jesus.
- Jul 19, 202628x their median
Men, either you lead your family or satan will. Your family does not need your silence, passivity, or excuses. They need you to stand between them and the enemy. God held Adam accountable first because leadership means responsibility. It means protecting, providing, serving, and having the courage to speak when something is wrong. The question God asked Adam is the same question every man must answer today: “Where are you?”
- Jul 14, 202621x their median
You can't be a Bible believing Christian and a Socialist. You can't separate Christianity from economics. If God owns everything, then government doesn't. The Bible teaches that God delegates stewardship to individuals and families, protects private property with "You shall not steal," and commands parents to leave an inheritance for their children. Those aren't modern political ideas. They're biblical principles. Before you label this controversial, ask yourself one question: Does your worldview come from Scripture... or from culture?
- Aug 30, 202638x their median
Government belongs under God, and when it rejects His authority, freedom is always at risk. Christians have been told that staying out of politics is somehow more spiritual. But when believers withdraw, godless leaders do not leave the space empty. They use fear to seize control, attack life, restrict religious liberty, and replace God with government.
- Jul 12, 202617x their median
Everyone wants to debate Sodom and Gomorrah. Few people want to read what the Bible actually says. God's Word isn't confusing. It's confronting. We don't need a new interpretation every time culture changes. We need the humility to let Scripture change us. https://t.co/j3i4Bfz9tS
- Sep 13, 202632x their median
A family cannot be led by a boy who refuses responsibility. A godly man gets up every day ready to protect, provide, serve, and sacrifice for his wife and children. Your family doesn’t need you to be perfect. They need you to grow up, show up, and lead. https://t.co/nVLpLaqlGp
- Oct 5, 202627x their median
I’m completely sure who needs to hear this, but it’s ok to use a ladder as a sermon demonstration
- Aug 11, 202625x their median
Is suicide the unforgivable sin? It’s a heavy question, but Scripture points us to hope: Jesus died for all our sins. His grace is greater than our darkest moment. If you are struggling right now, reach out to someone you trust, leave a comment below or email us and we will pray for you.
- Mar 1, 20269.2x their median
Fuller context of Driscoll's recent sermon about us. And folks; it's bad, with Mark repeatedly lying. 🚨🚨🚨 1. He doesn't seem to be a fan of new media, saying that blogs, social media, and YouTube "do not count as journalism" and should not be considered 'news.' Right prior to this, he would add: There's just wild, stupid, crazy stuff on the internet. So you gotta be careful and you gotta be discerning..you shall not go around as a slanderer. A slanderer is this, it's character assassination. You're trying to murder, Jesus calls this heart murder.... And so if you hate someone, if you wanna slander them, if you wanna libel them, if you wanna destroy them, if you wanna assassinate them, what you do is you speak evil and malice against them. 2. After saying that his job description is to "tell the truth and get lied about," he says that we wrote a "article-hit" (and we note, not just a "headline-hit") where we repeatedly lied about him. 3. Driscoll explains, "What they didn't say was, it was a woman preaching to women at a women's meeting about not being feminists. They're like, (mimics smoking weed) 'oh those are details.' I know they're details. I know. 4. Repeats his claim that "So what they didn't tell you was that it was preaching to women." 5. Reiterates "I will always tell the truth, I will never pull a punch, and when I am wrong, I will repent so that I can be in agreement with the truth." 6. Mark is likely hoping no one from his congregation reads the nasty "article-hit," otherwise they would see he's leading them astray. We specifically say in the article: "Driscoll repeatedly defended pastor Millicent's preaching and presence at his church, justifying it by pointing out that she was preaching to women and that it was part of a midweek gathering." 7. Because we care about getting things right and giving proper context, we also included the snapshot (below) of Driscoll saying that very thing, so folks could see him saying in his own words that the preaching was relegated to the women only at a women's event. 8. And again, we have no issue with women teaching women. That's not an emphasis we have any problem, though it makes for a nice strawman. The issue is Mark inviting a female 'Executive Pastor' of a church whose Co-Lead Pastor is also a woman. 9. Specifically, because Mark previously wrote in one of his books that women are "unfit" to lead the church, but has as of yet to explain why it's ok expose his womenfolk to "unfit" pastoral teaching. Call us conspiratorial, but given the reputation that Driscoll has, or perhaps now 'has,' we get the sense that her title of pastor wasn’t featured too prominently in the event promo material, and would even wager that for many of his congregants, the first time they heard about it was our article or his message now.
- Sep 2, 202613x their median
"I knew that @PastorMark would be a bit controversial, I had no idea the scope of the reaction" https://t.co/MBuOKcS7B0
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 467K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Posts are seen about 7.5K times each, and 0.428% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video, 27% are part of a thread and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 529K interactions, about 16544x its own typical post.
- What is Pastor Mark Driscoll's engagement rate on X?
- Pastor Mark Driscoll (@PastorMark) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 467,266 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.007%, Pastor Mark Driscoll sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,368 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @PastorMark have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @PastorMark post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.67 posts per day across the measured window.