Back to @PastorMalafaia's profile

Silas Malafaia engagement report

@PastorMalafaia - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 85 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.162%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
9.22%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
1.76%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.83/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 2.4K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.162%. Measured over 85 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 9.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.76% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 85 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 9.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 85 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Silas Malafaia's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.162%, Silas Malafaia sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.127% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,148 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,016 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 169 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 28, 20269.9x their median

    É MUITO SÉRIO! DIVULGUE, POR FAVOR! https://t.co/cgFBHdtKfm

    15K5.3K3.0K309488K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20265.0x their median

    UMA VERGONHA PARA A GLOBO ! Como pode a globo manter Miriam leitão como Jornalista ? Da vontade de vomitar vendo um ativismo político de esquerda baixo . O mesmo discurso que a imprensa esquerdopata fez durante 4 anos que Bolsonaro ia dar um golpe . É a mesma história agora ! Quem aparelhou a justiça foi Lula . É só ver a tropa de choque dele no STF .Uma acusação inescrupulosa a Flávio Bolsonaro . DESESPERO TOTAL !

    10K1.4K25224190K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20264.4x their median

    GRAVÍSSIMO! O desespero de Lula e seus aliados promovendo guerra religiosa com uma fake news. Cadê a imprensa, que não repudia com veemência esse absurdo? https://t.co/mJVOpUe08E

    6.9K2.1K1.2K57182K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20264.3x their median

    PIADA, ABSURDO! O criminoso é André Mendonça, e não Alexandre de Moraes. https://t.co/521EOSgdkT

    7.8K1.9K3734793K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20264.3x their median

    O COMUNISTA FLÁVIO DINO, ESCUDEIRO DE LULA, DESMORALIZA O STF O absurdo dos absurdos! https://t.co/vXKa6ipm8b

    7.1K2.1K8623660K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.8x their median

    SIMPLESMENTE SENSACIONAL! Assista até o final https://t.co/8Cx1CZSBOk

    6.5K2.3K1297891K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.8x their median

    FORA, ALEXANDRE DE MORAES! A casa caiu! Esse vai ser o mote nas manifestações do 7 de setembro. https://t.co/OmBP5hBpsm

    6.8K1.7K3284656K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.4x their median

    UMA PALAVRA PROFÉTICA SOBRE ALEXANDRE DE MORAES (Vídeo do dia 7 de setembro de 2025) https://t.co/l9pVyRY51j

    6.6K1.2K1913166K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.1x their median

    Alexandre de Moraes tem que ser afastado já! https://t.co/CTi2fdOkYd

    6.0K1.2K1271336K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20263.0x their median

    ALEXANDRE DE MORAES E PAULO GONET TÊM QUE SER AFASTADOS IMEDIATAMENTE PELO BEM DO BRASIL Assista a este vídeo até o final. Contra provas, não existem argumentos! https://t.co/3oZQK0GdSg

    5.3K1.4K3272844K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.4K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.162%. Measured over 85 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 9.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.76% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 85 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 9.9x its own typical post.

What is Silas Malafaia's engagement rate on X?
Silas Malafaia (@PastorMalafaia) has an engagement rate of 0.162%, based on the median interactions across 85 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,450,338 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.162%, Silas Malafaia sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PastorMalafaia have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PastorMalafaia post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going