Back to @ParticleNtwrk's profile

Particle Network engagement report

@ParticleNtwrk - 729K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.013%
of 729K followers
Per impression
0.484%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
2.73%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
98
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.2/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 729K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.484% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 787 interactions, about 8.0x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, Particle Network sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 445 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 23, 20268.0x their median

    Introducing Autopilot, a fully autonomous trading AI agent for everyone. Want to trade while you're sleeping or working, without losing your edge? Minara can manage your positions hands-free for as long as you like. Just toggle it on/off anytime, and she continuously adjusts to optimize for a higher win rate. Unlike most quant or LLM trading platforms. No bot vault. No fund custody. You simply co-trade with Minara AI, while keeping full control of your positions. The first strategy is an upgraded and robust version of our benchmark, with a better APY in backtests.

    42413617255103K viewsView on X
  • Mar 24, 20267.5x their median

    Universal Accounts are now 1-year old... and so, we're leveling up. We're introducing full EIP-7702 support, allowing you to make any app chain-agnostic. Works out of the box with @privy_io, @dynamic_xyz, and @magic_labs. Connect an EOA to make it Universal. Zero migration required. Pay gas with any token. Deposit from any chain, Solana or EVM. Seamless cross-chain txs. In short, forget about chains. Start building 👇

    30226611554474K viewsView on X
  • Feb 26, 20264.4x their median

    The holy grail of terminals is here. UniversalX PRO is live. ⏩ Trade on any chain using SOL or stablecoins (NO BRIDGING) ⏩ Call tracking from thousands of TG & WeChat groups ⏩ Multi-wallet trading (including cross-chain trades) ⏩ Native iOS & Android app, synced with Web ⏩ Fastest cross-chain trades in the industry ⏩ Ultra low-latency Solana trades ⏩ Wallet tracking on Solana & EVM ⏩ Mobile push-notifications for price changes & limit order fills ⏩ No gas tokens required to buy/sell, pay gas using any balance ⏩ Modular UI, drag-and-drop trackers & custom themes ⏩ Denominate trading in SOL, USD, EUR, CNY, ETH, or BNB Developed over 1.5 years of working with the community: now available on Desktop, iOS App Store, and the Google Play Store.

    252339455214K viewsView on X
  • Feb 24, 20263.0x their median

    EVERYTHING WILL BE ALRIGHT 03/24/2026 https://t.co/HRUNPDHCAd

    17129878138K viewsView on X
  • Apr 15, 20263.0x their median

    Today, the 7702 Collective debuts.🔎 This coalition aims to put crypto's spotlight back where it belongs: beyond narratives and into the trends driving true adoption + consolidation. As our first move, we're publishing The State of Crypto Innovation. This builders-first assessment of crypto’s maturing infrastructure gathers insights from Web3's top builders on what, exactly, is taking us to the next level. (1/2)👇

    169376522230K viewsView on X
  • Mar 4, 20262.5x their median

    NEVER BRIDGE AGAIN. (Had to match the timeline's energy). 03/24/2026 https://t.co/4B8WPt9SUb

    13437744224K viewsView on X
  • Jan 8, 20262.2x their median

    2025 gave us: 🟣 The first chain-agnostic apps using Universal Accounts 🟣 Thousands of traders and $1B+ in volume for @UseUniversalX 🟣 $PARTI, the Particle Chain live on @avax, and permissionless SDKs 🟣 Tons of integrations & new frens Full recap: https://t.co/nqAHdSVUDo https://t.co/3zRxjYBtIn

    9050732107K viewsView on X
  • May 3, 20262.2x their median

    We’re on the path to chain-abstract everything. In March, we announced 7702 Universal Accounts, allowing any account to become a Universal Account. Today, we’re revealing the next phase of our roadmap, including two new products coming over the next few months: 1. Universal Deposit SDK: 10 lines of code to let users deposit into your app from any chain. 2. Universal Agent Accounts: An API and dashboard that allow AI agents to own and manage their own Universal Accounts. These are the next major steps for Universal Accounts: making them easier to integrate, more powerful for developers, and more widely distributed across the onchain ecosystem. In short: chain abstraction is inevitable. Read the full article here: https://t.co/E8h41JPsZz

    1373441286K viewsView on X
  • Jan 13, 20261.9x their median

    We thought Solana succeeded by prioritizing User Experience. HOWEVER, it was something else that set them apart: Putting PEOPLE first. Head of Engineering @jnwng describes this approach. Full convo at https://t.co/5PJkyiR8Wx https://t.co/go1XapipRL

    6010126257K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20261.7x their median

    The new UniversalX is here. ⚡️ 5X faster fills 📈 Zero-latency charts ⛓️ Hyper-efficient cross-chain infra 🔎 20+ new data and discovery features Trade any token, with just SOL or stables. The best multi-chain terminal ever. LIVE on desktop, Android and iOS. https://t.co/uuuXLguT7d

    9220471047K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 729K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.484% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 787 interactions, about 8.0x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Particle Network's engagement rate on X?
Particle Network (@ParticleNtwrk) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 729,483 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, Particle Network sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ParticleNtwrk have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @ParticleNtwrk post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going