Back to @Parrattarna's profile

Anonymous🏴 engagement report

@Parrattarna - 108K followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.017%
of 108K followers
Per impression
1.36%
1.4K views on a typical post
Reach
1.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18
interactions (median)
Saved
0.073%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 108K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 1.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 739x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #acab, #anonymous, #france. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tags: #acab, #anonymous, #france.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, Anonymous🏴 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 217 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 2, 2026739x their median

    Emails reveal new theory about who Jeffrey Epstein was really working for https://t.co/mFwIOSKCN0 https://t.co/oFYIeKfdVl

    6.4K1.1K4.4K1.4K12M viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 202580x their median

    U.S. envoy to Syria Tom Barrack brokered Trump’s Gulf alliances. Now he’s running PR for a regime that executed civilians in hospital beds—while scheming to dismantle the SDF. Let's follow the money, and the bodies...🧵

    1.1K3204234606K viewsView on X
  • Dec 28, 202444x their median

    My account was blocked in Turkey because of my posts about Kobane and Rojava. Ankara Court made a request to @elonmusk. Elon removed dozens of posts about Rojava and blocked my account. Is this freedom of expression? #Freeinternet #Censorship https://t.co/1rHXzp9MDW

    60613943746K viewsView on X
  • Feb 1, 202642x their median

    It was reported that Erdogan gifted Apple Watch watches to some of his guests. He was using these watches to monitor and listen to people. Document No: EFTA01616386 #EpsteinFiles https://t.co/P9TUQE95uS

    52021891398K viewsView on X
  • Feb 3, 202638x their median

    Hold Tom Barrack accountable for every child kidnapped or disappeared in Syria and the Middle East. And yes—hold Trump accountable too, because Barrack is still in office. They must answer for corruption and crimes against children. #EpsteinFiles https://t.co/qwapKK6eXc

    464177241128K viewsView on X
  • Feb 2, 202628x their median

    The email from Noam Chomsky in Epstein files, mentions that Gulf countries were supporting the ISIS organization in Syria despite official denials. It also indicates that Turkey, a US ally, was supporting the Nusra Front. #EpsteinFiles https://t.co/HF07xBdsme

    363125126106K viewsView on X
  • Feb 1, 202627x their median

    The Epstein Papers will reveal much more about Türkiye, but Turkish society won't care; neither the opposition nor the pro-government public will be bothered by it, they are all poisoned by rigid statism and nationalism.

    365922219.6K viewsView on X
  • Feb 2, 202616x their median

    This image is one of the most horrifying ever recorded. A circle surrounds small children, as if they are being inspected and chosen as victims. #EpsteinFiles https://t.co/H5nRA5P9hq

    2086413822K viewsView on X
  • Feb 2, 202612x their median

    Cluster Fuck Nusra, ISIS, al-Qaeda, Jibah,and Hamas _ every one of their leaders overwhelmingly prefers Donald. And Trump legitimized the Nusra leader and terrorist Jolani by making him president in Syria. They probably had things in common, such as killing children. #Epstein https://t.co/3LwRtn1Gib

    14464746.9K viewsView on X
  • Feb 3, 202612x their median

    Arda Beskardes is a Turkish immigration lawyer who has been allegedly linked to Jeffrey Epstein—accused of facilitating child trafficking involving Turkiye and the United States, and of traveling to Turkiye alongside Epstein.” #EpsteinFiles https://t.co/5UmQ8gA8tS

    140653121K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#acab#anonymous#france#hacked#mklphackers

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 108K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 1.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 739x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #acab, #anonymous, #france. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Anonymous🏴's engagement rate on X?
Anonymous🏴 (@Parrattarna) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 108,079 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, Anonymous🏴 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Parrattarna have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Parrattarna post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going