Back to @ParMadSex1's profile

ParMadSex engagement report

@ParMadSex1 - 245K followers on X

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.176%
of 245K followers
Per impression
1.57%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
11.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
426
interactions (median)
Saved
0.428%
116 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 426 interactions against 245K followers, an engagement rate of 0.176%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ParMadSex's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.176%, ParMadSex sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,186 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,400 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link18% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 301 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 20, 202640x their median

    Me encanta cuando dice "Al suelo mejor" Sé que me va a empotrar y teme romper la cama. Levanto las piernas para sentirlo más profundo e introduzco mis dedos en su ano; sé que le fascina y embiste más fuerte, mientras le susurro al oído "Bebé, creo que necesitamos un tercero...". https://t.co/WRUgCQpu16

    16K1.7K1910254K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202024x their median

    Buscamos otras PAREJAS en MADRID para situaciones morbosas, puede que solo sea tener sexo en el coche pegados, para ver y ser vistos, cada uno con su pareja. Preferimos el sexo mental que se genera, que el físico, queremos momentos que RECORDAR y no que tener que OLVIDAR https://t.co/JRUVijb4G1

    8.9K1.0K23819View on X
  • Sep 17, 202613x their median

    Le susurré al oído "¿Dónde quieres que me ponga?". ELLA respondió "Sigue ahí, quiero verte los ojos". Le hice un gesto al invitado; era el momento de que entrara por detrás. Cuando lo hizo, de mi MUJER comenzó a brotar un líquido caliente que empapó mis todos mis genitales. https://t.co/ddqFKZvnHu

    5.1K593176115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202613x their median

    No es fácil dar con un invitado adecuado que entienda este juego. Muchos confunden el deseo con la prisa, sin ver que el verdadero objetivo es gozar a TODOS. Entrar por detrás escuchando sus MOVIMIENTOS y mirando sus GEMIDOS... no, al revés. https://t.co/glBf0tBZRp

    4.7K682158111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202612x their median

    Esa primera doble penetración superó lo esperado gracias a su experiencia previa anal. Sorprendió ver la facilidad con la que se adaptó al tamaño del invitado mientras yo la acompañaba. Sentir esa intensa presión interna y la cercanía de ambos cuerpos fue un morbo inolvidable. https://t.co/bTlLkMMgJl

    4.6K660149106K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20266.4x their median

    Nos gusta ver y ser vistos. Por eso, a veces quedamos con un invitado de @hola_wyylde en un lugar acordado. Llegamos y nos vamos al asiento de atrás. Bajamos las ventanillas y me pregunta "¿Está mirando? ¿Se está tocando?". Su timidez la impide mirar. https://t.co/clMiAVl1ts https://t.co/Z1m0IasKt7

    2.4K31419468K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20266.1x their median

    Es mi primera vez viviendo una experiencia doble; la intensidad es total y se siente fantástico. El ritmo compartido nos lleva a una sucesión de sensaciones increíbles, en una entrega absoluta llena de pasión y de una complicidad única que nos fortalece. https://t.co/GaSsQcEHOf

    2.3K2647254K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20266.0x their median

    Le confesé al invitado nuestro deseo de una doble penetración. Tras prepararlo todo con sumo cuidado, él se acercó por detrás mientras yo la miraba a los ojos. Sentirla mojarse de esa manera me hizo desearla aún más, perdiéndonos en un momento que me hizo compartir sus fluidos. https://t.co/Tcn9fdlA66

    2.3K2004164K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20264.2x their median

    Si alguien me pide consejo para iniciarse con su MUJER, sugiero un Glory Hole JUNTOS. Una cabina sin miradas externas, usando ese espacio para el morbo propio. Nadie confunde nada; es solo el juego de la pareja en el mismo lugar, para luego terminar disfrutando los dos solos. https://t.co/MW30JMvp7h

    1.6K1589468K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20264.2x their median

    En el hotel, aquella pareja me sorprendió. ELLA me miró cómplice "Me ha contado un secreto tu marido... ¿Te atreves a probar una doble penetración? Te comparto a mi marido" Sonrojada por la audacia de la propuesta, miré al mío sonriendo y le dije con total decisión "Ponte debajo" https://t.co/GUOjUsoyOA

    1.6K1675056K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 426 interactions against 245K followers, an engagement rate of 0.176%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

What is ParMadSex's engagement rate on X?
ParMadSex (@ParMadSex1) has an engagement rate of 0.176%, based on the median interactions across 62 original posts from the last 30 days against 245,389 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.176%, ParMadSex sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ParMadSex1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ParMadSex1 post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going