Back to @Papa_Hotel's profile

🏄‍♂️ Paulo Henrique 🇪🇪 engagement report

@Papa_Hotel - 137K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.402%
of 137K followers
Per impression
10.5%
5.3K views on a typical post
Reach
3.85%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
552
interactions (median)
Saved
0.114%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.33/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 552 interactions against 137K followers, an engagement rate of 0.402%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 10.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 44x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #foralula, #forapt.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #foralula, #forapt.

Compared with accounts its own size

🏄‍♂️ Paulo Henrique 🇪🇪's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.402%, 🏄‍♂️ Paulo Henrique 🇪🇪 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 70 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 27, 202644x their median

    A mentira tem perna curta O lugar de mentirosos é na lata do lixo da história! https://t.co/ycEnGsDv6h

    18K5.2K382185267K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202634x their median

    🚨ALCOLUMBRE FEZ DE TUDO para BARRAR a CPI do BANCO MASTER. Depois dessas mensagens tão carinhosas com VORCARO fica fácil entender o motivo. ALCOLUMBRE não tem a menor condição de permanecer na presidência do SENADO! https://t.co/lhsg74iFOc

    14K4.7K15184126K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202628x their median

    Quem fez isto 👀💨💨😁 https://t.co/YPeBYOZ9W9

    12K2.5K528191248K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202622x their median

    Creio que o sentimento de qualquer brasileiro politizado neste momento é de nojo. Vídeo produzido por Diego Gonçalves. https://t.co/PT39XSuznU

    9.4K2.7K7577116K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202620x their median

    Para quem tem alguma dúvida em quem votar, veja o que a GLOBO está noticiando: 👇 👇 👇 https://t.co/49E9IowciG

    7.9K2.9K113126171K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202617x their median

    STF do Brasil acabou. Verdade é essa. Ninguém em sã consciência respeita isso mais. https://t.co/lsnVYRtnl1

    8.1K1.4K832352K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202613x their median

    Alexandre de Moraes, o homem mais versátil do Judiciário. https://t.co/9gNcGV8jdY

    6.0K1.2K1144162K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20269.1x their median

    https://t.co/F4CKOUyG4b

    4.1K818802026K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20268.1x their median

    Vixe https://t.co/AelIpZziSi

    3.2K1.1K6063127K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20266.5x their median

    O Grêmio tem novo patrocinador master. https://t.co/TJrm8BnppB

    3.0K517661426K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#foralula#forapt

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 552 interactions against 137K followers, an engagement rate of 0.402%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 10.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 44x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #foralula, #forapt.

What is 🏄‍♂️ Paulo Henrique 🇪🇪's engagement rate on X?
🏄‍♂️ Paulo Henrique 🇪🇪 (@Papa_Hotel) has an engagement rate of 0.402%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 136,958 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.402%, 🏄‍♂️ Paulo Henrique 🇪🇪 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Papa_Hotel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Papa_Hotel post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going